Category: Hem/Onc Updates

FDA Approves Radioligand Therapy with PLUVICTO® Before Chemotherapy in Castrate Resistant Prostate Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on March 28, 2025, expanded the indication for Lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (PLUVICTO®) to include adults with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) who have been treated with Androgen Receptor Pathway Inhibitor (ARPI) therapy and are considered appropriate to delay taxane-based chemotherapy. Patients with previously treated mCRPC should be selected for PLUVICTO® using LOCAMETZ® (active ingredient Gallium Ga 68 gozetotide) or another approved PSMA Positron Emission Tomography (PET) product based on PSMA expression in tumors.

Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the United States, about 313,780 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2025 and 35,770 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced prostate cancer, and is the first treatment intervention. Androgen Deprivation Therapies have included bilateral orchiectomy or Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues, with or without first generation Androgen Receptor (AR) inhibitors such as CASODEX® (Bicalutamide), NILANDRON® (Nilutamide) and EULEXIN® (Flutamide) or with second-generation Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI), which include ZYTIGA® (Abiraterone), XTANDI® (Enzalutamide) and ERLEADA® (Apalutamide). Approximately 10-20% of patients with advanced prostate cancer will progress to Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (CRPC) within five years during ADT, and over 80% of these patients will have metastatic disease at the time of CRPC diagnosis. The estimated mean survival of patients with CRPC is 9-36 months, and there is therefore an unmet need for new effective therapies. Patients who progress on Androgen Deprivation Therapy are often switched to second line hormonal treatments that block testosterone with a different mechanism of action, and upon further progression, offered taxane based chemotherapy.

Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) is a Type II cell membrane glycoprotein that is selectively expressed in prostate cells, with high levels of expression in prostatic adenocarcinoma. PSMA is a therefore an excellent target for molecular imaging and therapeutics, due to its high specificity for prostate cancer.

Lutetium Lu 177 vipivotide tetraxetan (PLUVICTO®) is a radiopharmaceutical that targets PSMA. It is comprised of Lutetium-177, a cytotoxic radionuclide, linked to the ligand PSMA-617, a small molecule designed to bind with high affinity to PSMA. Radioligand therapy with PLUVICTO® targets PSMA and releases its payload of lethal beta radiation into the prostate cancer cell.

The FDA in March 2022, approved PLUVICTO® for the treatment of adult patients with Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA)-positive metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC), who had been treated with Androgen-Receptor Pathway Inhibitors (ARPI) such as Enzalutamide or Abiraterone acetate and 1 or 2 taxane based chemotherapy regimens. This approval was based on the VISION Phase III study.

PSMAfore is a Phase III trial conducted to assess the benefit of PLUVICTO® in patients with metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer who had progressed on ARPIs, but had NOT received taxane based chemotherapy, with the hope of making this promising therapy available to more patients earlier in the course of their treatment journey. This study enrolled 468 patients (N=468) with taxane-naive metastatic CRPC who had PSMA-positive disease on gallium-68–PSMA-11 PET/CT, and were candidates for an ARPI change after one progression on prior ARPI. Patients were randomized (1:1) to receive PLUVICTO® 7.4 GBq (200 mCi) IV every 6 weeks for 6 doses, or a change in ARPI (Abiraterone or Enzalutamide). The Primary endpoint was radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) declines of 50% or more from baseline – known as a PSA50 response, Quality of Life measures, and Safety profiles.

At the Primary analysis conducted at 7.3 months, patients treated with PLUVICTO® demonstrated a median rPFS of 9.3 months compared to 5.6 months in the ARPI change group, showing a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit (HR=0.41; P<0.0001).

In the updated exploratory analysis, performed with a median follow-up of 24 months, PLUVICTO® more than doubled median rPFS versus ARPI change group (11.6 months versus 5.6 months, HR=0.49), with a 51% reduction in the risk of radiographic progression or death with PLUVICTO® versus a change in ARPI. At the preplanned final analysis, Overall Survival (OS) numerically favored PLUVICTO® but was not statistically significant. The median OS was 24.5 months with PLUVICTO® and 23.1 months with a change in ARPI (HR=0.91 (95% CI, 0.72-1.14). High crossover rate may have confounded OS analysis. Approximately 60% of patients randomized to the change in ARPI group subsequently crossed over to receive PLUVICTO® following confirmed radiographic progression. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) in the PLUVICTO® group was 49% versus 14% in the change in ARPI group, with Complete Response Rates of 21% versus 2.8%, respectively. PSA50 response was 51% with PLUVICTO® and 17% with change in ARPI.

The most frequently reported all-grade adverse events for PLUVICTO® included dry mouth, fatigue, nausea, and constipation, and were primarily Grade 1-2. Further, PLUVICTO® did not impair the ability of patients to be treated with subsequent chemotherapy.

It was concluded that in the updated analysis of the PSMAfore trial, PLUVICTO® more than doubled median rPFS versus a change in ARPI, with favorable safety profile and proven tolerability. The findings from the PSMAfore study suggest that PLUVICTO® could provide a viable therapeutic option earlier in the disease course, potentially delaying or obviating the need for more toxic chemotherapy regimens.

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/resources-information-approved-drugs/fda-expands-pluvictos-metastatic-castration-resistant-prostate-cancer-indication

KADCYLA® Improves Overall Survival in Residual HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated that in the US, approximately 316,950 new cases of female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2025, and about 42,170 women will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

The HER or erbB family of receptors consist of HER1, HER2, HER3 and HER4. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive early stage, as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer. Since the approval of HERCEPTIN®, several other HER2-targeted therapies have become available. The duration of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® therapy has been 12 months and this length of treatment was empirically adopted from the pivotal registration trials.

KADCYLA® (Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansine, T-DM1) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) comprised of the antibody HERCEPTIN® and the chemotherapy agent Emtansine, linked together. Upon binding to the HER2 receptor, it not only inhibits the HER2 signaling pathways but also delivers a chemotherapy agent Emtansine, a microtubule inhibitor, directly inside the tumor cells. This agent is internalized by lysosomes and destroys the HER2-positive tumor cells upon intracellular release. In the EMILIA trial, KADCYLA® was associated with significant increase in Overall Survival (OS), when compared with TYKERB® (Lapatinib) plus XELODA® (Capecitabine), in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients, who had previously received HERCEPTIN® and a Taxane.

It is well established that patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, following HERCEPTIN® based neoadjuvant therapies, have a pathological Complete Response rate of 40-60%. Those without a pathological Complete Response tend to have significantly less favorable outcomes. These patients irrespective of pathological response status complete their standard adjuvant therapy which includes 12 months of HER2-targeted therapy.

KATHERINE trial was conducted to evaluate the benefit of switching from standard HER2-directed therapy to single-agent KADCYLA®, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy along with either single or dual HER2 targeted therapy, in patients with residual invasive cancer at surgery. This study was conducted to address the unmet need of patients who have residual invasive breast cancer after receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy.

The KATHERINE trial is an open-label, Phase III global study, which compared KADCYLA® with HERCEPTIN®, as an adjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, who had residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HERCEPTIN®. This study included 1,486 patients with HER2-positive early stage breast cancer, who were found to have residual invasive disease in the breast or axillary lymph nodes at surgery, following at least six cycles (16 weeks) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a Taxane (with or without Anthracycline) and HERCEPTIN®. Within 12 weeks of surgery, patients (N=1486) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to KADCYLA® 3.6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks or HERCEPTIN® 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks, for 14 cycles (743 patients in each group). Patients also received standard-of-care radiation and endocrine therapy as per institutional guidelines. Both treatment groups were well balanced and Hormone Receptor positive disease was present in 72% of the patients. The majority of the patients (77%) had received an Anthracycline-containing neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen, and in 19% of the patients, another HER2-targeted agent in addition to HERCEPTIN® (dual HER2 blockade) had been administered as a component of neoadjuvant therapy. The Primary end point was invasive Disease Free Survival-iDFS (defined as freedom from ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence, ipsilateral locoregional invasive breast cancer recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, distant recurrence, or death from any cause). The Primary analysis showed that 3-year invasive DFS was significantly higher in the KADCYLA® group than in the HERCEPTIN® group (88.3% vs. 77.0%; HR=0.50; P<0.001), suggesting that KADCYLA® reduced the risk of developing an invasive breast cancer recurrence or death by 50%.

The researchers in this publication reported the prespecified final analysis of invasive DFS, and the second interim analysis of Overall Survival. With a median follow-up of 8.4 years, KADCYLA® sustained its superiority over HERCEPTIN® in improving invasive DFS and OS. The 7-year invasive DFS rate was 80.8% with KADCYLA® vs. 67.1% with HERCEPTIN® (unstratified HR=0.54, confirming a 46% reduction in risk. The 7-year OS was 89.1% with KADCYLA® vs. 84.4% with HERCEPTIN® (unstratified HR=0.66; P=0.003), demonstrating a 34% reduction in mortality risk.

Further analyses revealed consistent benefits across key subgroups which included patients with low tumor burden minimal residual disease (1 cm or less, node-negative), HER2-negative residual disease on retesting, both ER-positive and ER-negative patients, as well as HER2 expression level, with patients with IHC 3+ HER2 expression experiencing the most significant benefit (HR=0.47), whereas those with IHC 2+ ISH-amplified tumors had a smaller, though still positive, effect (HR=0.84).

The incidence of adverse events of Grade 3 or higher was noted in 26.1% of patients receiving KADCYLA® compared to 15.7% in the HERCEPTIN® group. The frequency of CNS metastases was comparable between the two cohorts, suggesting that while KADCYLA® enhances control of extracranial disease, it does not necessarily reduce CNS metastases.

In conclusion, the KATHERINE trial has established KADCYLA® as the new standard of care for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer with residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant therapy. Long-term follow-up confirms sustained benefits in invasive DFS and OS, with an acceptable safety profile. While KADCYLA® significantly reduces recurrence and improves survival, certain high-risk subgroups may require additional therapeutic strategies, prompting the need for ongoing research. Future advancements in HER2-targeted therapies, including Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors, Antibody Drug Conjugates, and immunotherapy combinations, will further refine treatment strategies and improve outcomes for this high-risk patient population.

Survival with Trastuzumab Emtansine in Residual HER2-Positive Breast Cancer. Geyer CE, Untch M, Huang C-S, et al. for the KATHERINE Study Group. N Engl J Med 2025;392:249-257

BIZENGRI® for Non Small Cell Lung Cancer and Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA granted accelerated approval to Zenocutuzumab-zbco (BIZENGRI®) for adults with advanced, unresectable, or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) harboring a neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene fusion with disease progression on or after prior systemic therapy, or advanced, unresectable, or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma harboring a NRG1 gene fusion with disease progression on or after prior systemic therapy. This represents the first FDA approval of a systemic therapy for patients with NSCLC or pancreatic adenocarcinoma harboring an NRG1 gene fusion.

Genomic rearrangements involving the neuregulin 1 (NRG1) gene have been implicated in a variety of solid tumors, including lung, breast, pancreas, ovarian, and prostate cancers. NRG1 fusions are rare oncogenic drivers occurring in less than 1% of solid tumors, highly enriched in KRAS-wild-type pancreatic adenocarcinoma and invasive mucinous adenocarcinoma of the lung. NRG1 fusions produce chimeric ligands that activate the ERBB Receptor Tyrosine Kinase (RTK) family, a group of proteins frequently exploited by cancer cells to promote tumor growth. In lung cancer, NRG1 fusions are associated with poor prognosis in patients with lung cancer, with low Response Rates to standard chemotherapy and immunotherapy, and a short Overall Survival.

The ERBB RTK family includes EGFR (ERBB1), HER2 (ERBB2), HER3 (ERBB3), and HER4 (ERBB4). These proteins mediate crucial cell signaling pathways that regulate growth and survival. They can be oncogenically activated by ligand stimulation such as NRG1 fusion proteins binding to HER3 or HER4, mutations and translocations that may confer constitutive enzymatic activity, such as EGFR kinase domain mutations, the EGFRvIII variant (where the extracellular region of EGFR is deleted), EGFR fusions or gene amplification, or protein overexpression resulting in increasing receptor abundance on cell surfaces to amplify signaling.

NRG1 preferentially binds to HER3 and HER4, promoting their heterodimerization with other ERBB family members like HER2 and EGFR. This interaction is critical because HER3, a pseudokinase, lacks intrinsic enzymatic activity and depends on phosphorylation by its heterodimer partners. The activated HER3 forms docking sites for SH2-domain proteins, triggering multiple downstream signal transduction pathways like the PI3K pathway, which drive proliferation and survival.

Zenocutuzumab is a bispecific humanized immunoglobulin G1 (IgG1) containing two different Fab arms targeting the extracellular domains of HER2 and HER3. The HER2-targeting arm binds HER2, concentrating the antibody locally and positioning it (Dock) to block NRG1 binding to HER3 (Dock-and-block mechanism). The HER3-targeting arm prevents HER3 from undergoing the conformational changes necessary for heterodimerization with HER2 and EGFR. This dual targeting halts HER3 phosphorylation, disrupting downstream oncogenic signaling. Moreover, the glycoengineered IgG1 backbone of Zenocutuzumab enhances its affinity for Fc receptors, boosting Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC)-a mechanism by which immune cells destroy antibody-coated tumor cells.

eNRGy is a Phase 2 part of an open-label, multicenter, multicohort, registrational, Phase 1–2 clinical study of Zenocutuzumab, in patients with solid tumors with a NRG1 fusion. A total of 204 patients (N=204) with 12 tumor types were enrolled and patients had a median of one prior line of therapy, including platinum chemotherapy (72%) and Afatinib (11%). The median patient age was 62 years and most were female (60%), and 35% were Asian. The most common NRG1 fusion partners were CD74 (35%), SLC3A2 (14%), ATP1B1 (11%), SDC4/7 (7%), and CDH1/2 (3%). The most common fusion partners among patients with NSCLC were CD74 (in 56%) and SLC3A2 (in 23%), and the most common fusion partner among those with pancreatic cancer was ATP1B1 (in 44%). Most NRG1 fusions were identified by RNA sequencing (81%), followed by DNA sequencing (14%). Patients received Zenocutuzumab 750 mg IV every 2 weeks until disease progression. The Primary efficacy outcome measure was confirmed Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Secondary end points included Duration of Response (DOR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Safety. 

Among 158 patients who had measurable disease, the ORR among patients with NSCLC was 29% and median DOR was 12.7 months. The ORR among pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients was 42% and the DOR was 7.4 months. Responses were noted across multiple NRG1 fusion partners. In the pooled safety population, the most common adverse reactions were diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, fatigue, nausea, infusion-related reactions, dyspnea, rash, constipation, vomiting, abdominal pain, and edema. The most common Grade 3 or 4 laboratory abnormalities were increased gamma-glutamyl transferase, anemia, thrombocytopenia and hyponatremia.

It was concluded from this analysis that Zenocutuzumab provided robust and durable efficacy in advanced NRG1 positive NSCLC and pancreatic adenocarcinoma, with a well-tolerated safety profile, and represents a potential first and best-in-class therapy for patients with NRG1 fusion solid tumors.

Efficacy of Zenocutuzumab in NRG1 Fusion–Positive Cancer. Schram AM, Goto K,  Kim D-W, et al. for the eNRGy Investigators. N Engl J Med 2025;392:566-576

Adjuvant KEYTRUDA® Improves Disease Free Survival in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States for 2024, about 83,190 new cases of bladder cancer were diagnosed and approximately 16,840 patients died of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but it is less common in women. Bladder cancer accounts for 90% of urothelial cancers, and urothelial cancer can also be found in the renal pelvis, ureter and urethra.

A third of the patients initially present with locally invasive disease. The standard treatment for Cisplatin-eligible patients with Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer (MIBC) is neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by radical cystectomy. However, the high relapse rate and risk of death despite this treatment has prompted further research into optimizing outcomes. There is presently no clear consensus with regards to the routine use of adjuvant Cisplatin-based chemotherapy. Further, not all patients are eligible for adjuvant or neoadjuvant Cisplatin-based chemotherapy.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions. By inhibiting checkpoint proteins and their ligands, T cells are unleashed, resulting in T cell proliferation, activation and a therapeutic response. It has been noted that PD-L1 is widely expressed in tumor and immune cells of patients with urothelial carcinoma. This in turn helps cancer cells to evade detection from the immune system by binding to the PD-1 receptor on cytotoxic T lymphocytes.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response.

AMBASSADOR trial (Alliance A031501) is a randomized Phase 3 study, conducted to evaluate whether Pembrolizumab could enhance Disease-Free Survival (DFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in patients with high-risk Muscle Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma (MIUC) after radical surgery, compared to observation alone. This study enrolled 702 patients with high-risk MIUC who underwent radical surgery (cystectomy or nephroureterectomy) within 4-16 weeks before registration. Patients were considered to have high-risk MIUC if they were not eligible for or declined neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy and had pT3 or higher, or pN+, or microscopic positive surgical margins, or if they have persistent muscle-invasive disease (defined as a pathological stage of ypT2 or higher or ypN+ or microscopic positive surgical margins) despite the receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy at the time of radical surgery. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, to receive Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV every 3 weeks for 1 year (N=354) or to undergo observation (N=348). Both treatment groups were well balanced and stratification factors for randomization included PD-L1 status (positive or negative, with positivity defined as a Combined Positive Score of 10 or more using the PD-L1 IHC 22C3 pharmDx assay), prior receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and pathological stage. The median age was 69 years and patients with upper tract and urethral urothelial carcinoma were included in this study. The coPrimary endpoints were DFS and OS, and key Secondary endpoints included DFS and OS stratified by PD-L1 expression.

As of July 2024, with a median follow-up of 44.8 months, the median DFS was significantly longer in the Pembrolizumab group (29.6 months) compared to the observation group (14.2 months). The Hazard Ratio (HR) for disease progression or death was 0.73 (P=0.003), demonstrating a clear benefit. The DFS benefit was observed across all subgroups, regardless of age, PD-L1 status, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, pathological stage, or tumor location. PD-L1 status therefore should not be used to select patients for treatment with adjuvant Pembrolizumab. The Overall Survival data remain immature. The safety profile of Pembrolizumab was consistent with previous studies, though Grade 3 or higher adverse events were more frequent in the Pembrolizumab group (50.6%) compared to the observation group (31.6%).

In conclusion, adjuvant Pembrolizumab significantly improves DFS in patients with high-risk MIUC post-radical surgery, offering a promising treatment option for this population. These results, together with emerging tools such as circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) may enable more precise patient selection and stratification, optimizing the use of adjuvant therapies. As Overall Survival data mature and biomarker research evolves, the role of Pembrolizumab may become even more defined within the broader context of urothelial carcinoma treatment.

Adjuvant Pembrolizumab versus Observation in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma. Apolo AB, Ballman KV, Sonpavde G, et al. N Engl J Med 2025;392:45-55

Development of PAC-MANN Assay for Early Detection of Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2025, about 67,440 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 51,980 people will die of the disease. Detecting cancer at early stages can significantly increase survival rates and outcomes. Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma (PDAC) is one of the most lethal malignancies, ranking among the leading causes of cancer-related mortality globally. A significant challenge in improving PDAC outcomes is its frequent diagnosis at an advanced stage, when therapeutic options are limited and prognosis is poor. Early detection is critical to expanding treatment possibilities and enhancing survival rates. Currently, CA 19-9 is the only FDA-approved biomarker for PDAC; however, it is sanctioned solely for monitoring therapeutic response and not for diagnostic purposes.

Protease Activity in Cancer Detection
Protease production is a hallmark of tumor progression. In PDAC, as in many cancers, elevated circulating protease activity is observed. Proteases contribute to cancer metastasis by degrading extracellular matrices, facilitating tumor invasion. This biological activity presents a diagnostic opportunity: measuring protease activity in peripheral blood could provide a noninvasive means of detecting malignancy.

Assay Development: PAC-MANN
Montoya Mira, Fischer, and colleagues developed a novel, noninvasive diagnostic assay named PAC-MANN (Protease Activity Characterization via Magnetic Nanosensor), aimed at detecting PDAC via serum protease activity. The method utilizes a magnetic nanosensor coupled to a fluorescently labeled, protease-sensitive peptide probe. When exposed to a blood sample, if PDAC-associated proteases are active, they cleave the peptide substrate, releasing a fluorescent signal. The intensity of fluorescence correlates with protease activity, allowing for rapid and quantifiable detection.

Key Features of PAC-MANN Assay:

  • Sample Volume: Requires only 8 µL of blood.
  • Turnaround Time: Results available within 45 minutes.
  • Cost Efficiency: Material cost estimated at less than one cent per test.
  • Throughput: Capable of analyzing 300–500 samples per day with minimal personnel and equipment.

Clinical Performance

Validation Studies:

  • Sample Cohort: 110 pre-treatment PDAC samples (mean age 65.6 years; 57% male) and 246 noncancerous controls (mean age 63.2 years; 59% male), including cases of pancreatitis and pancreatic neoplasia.
  • Assay Accuracy:
    • Standalone PAC-MANN assay demonstrated 98% specificity and 73% sensitivity across all PDAC stages.
    • PAC-MANN combined with CA 19-9 achieved 85% sensitivity and 96% specificity for detecting stage I PDAC.
    • The assay accurately differentiated PDAC from noncancerous pancreatic conditions with 100% specificity.

Surgical Cohort Findings:
In patients undergoing tumor resection, post-surgical evaluation showed a 16 ± 24% reduction in probe cleavage signal, indicating potential utility in monitoring treatment efficacy.

Future Directions and Clinical Implications

Researchers emphasize that PAC-MANN is an initial step toward improved cancer diagnostics. Planned next steps include:

  • Prospective Clinical Trials: Targeting high-risk patient populations.
  • Global Sample Analysis: Expanding validation to diverse healthcare settings.
  • Technological Refinement: Enhancing assay sensitivity via engineering modifications (e.g., nanoparticle composition, probe architecture).
  • Multiplexing Potential: Early data suggest improved performance when multiple probes are used concurrently.
  • Broader Application: Initial results indicate potential use in detecting other gastrointestinal and possibly non-GI cancers through the measurement of protease activity.

Limitations and Considerations

While promising, the assay is not intended to replace imaging modalities. A positive test would necessitate further localization via advanced imaging techniques. As part of a multi-modal diagnostic strategy, PAC-MANN may significantly improve early PDAC detection and patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The PAC-MANN assay offers a rapid, low-cost, and highly specific method for detecting PDAC at early stages, especially when used in combination with CA 19-9. Its minimal sample requirement and ease of use make it a viable candidate for widespread clinical implementation. Further research and trials will ascertain its role in routine screening, particularly among high-risk populations, and its potential extension to other cancer types.

Early detection of pancreatic cancer by a high-throughput protease-activated nanosensor assay. Montoya Mira JL, Quentel A, Patel RK, et al. Science Translational Medicine.12 Feb 2025.Vol 17, Issue 785.

Ongoing Benefit with Enfortumab Vedotin Plus Pembrolizumab in Metastatic Urothelial Carcinoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States for 2025, about 84,870 new cases of bladder cancer will be diagnosed and approximately 17,420 patients will die of the disease. Bladder cancer is the fourth most common cancer in men, but it is less common in women. Bladder cancer accounts for 90% of urothelial cancers, and urothelial cancer can also be found in the renal pelvis, ureter and urethra. Approximately 12% of urothelial cancer cases at diagnosis are locally advanced or metastatic.

Patients with urothelial carcinoma are currently treated in the first line setting with a Platinum based chemotherapy regimen, and a checkpoint Inhibitor (PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor) in the second line setting. However, approximately 50% of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma are ineligible for Cisplatin-based chemotherapy due to toxicities, and responses are rarely durable. There is therefore a critical need for effective and tolerable first line treatment options in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Enfortumab vedotin-ejfv (PADCEV®) is a first-in-class Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets Nectin-4, a cell adhesion molecule highly expressed in urothelial cancers and other solid tumors. Nectin-4 has been implicated in tumor cell growth and proliferation. Following binding to Nectin-4 on the cell surface, Enfortumab vedotin becomes internalized and is processed by lysosomes, with the liberation of its cytotoxic payload, MonoMethyl Auristatin E (MMAE), which in turn disrupts microtubule assembly, leading to cell cycle arrest and apoptosis. Enfortumab vedotin resulted in significantly longer Overall Survival, Progression Free Survival, and a higher Overall Response Rate, than standard chemotherapy, in patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, who had previously received Platinum-based treatment and a PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitor. Preclinical studies with Enfortumab vedotin have shown hallmarks of immune cell death potentially augmented by PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors, and the rationale for this clinical trial was based on results from a previous cohort study.

Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. Pembrolizumab is the first agent to improve Overall Survival over chemotherapy, in the second line setting, for patients with recurrent, advanced urothelial carcinoma, and a significant proportion of patients who respond, have very durable responses.

EV-302 is a landmark Phase III, global, open-label, randomized trial comparing the efficacy and safety of Enfortumab vedotin and Pembrolizumab with the efficacy and safety of platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. A total of 886 eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive 3-week cycles of Enfortumab vedotin 1.25 mg/kg IV on days 1 and 8 and Pembrolizumab 200 mg IV on day 1 of every 3-week cycle (N=442) or chemotherapy consisting of Gemcitabine and either Cisplatin or Carboplatin (N=444), determined on the basis of eligibility to receive Cisplatin, for a maximum of 6 cycles. The maximum number of Pembrolizumab cycles allowed was 35 and there was no maximum number of cycles set for Enfortumab vedotin. The treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 69 yrs and randomization was stratified according to eligibility to receive Cisplatin (eligible or ineligible), PD-L1 expression status (High-CPS 10 or more versus Low-CPS less than 10), and liver metastases (present or absent). The co-Primary end points were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Secondary end points included Overall Response Rate (ORR) as assessed by BICR, Duration of Response, and Safety.

In the primary analysis of EV-302 (KEYNOTE-A39) study, the combination of Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group nearly doubled median PFS (12.5 months versus 6.3 months) and OS (31.5 months versus to 16.1 months), when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy, in patients with previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

In this report, the researchers reported the outcomes of EV-302 study after 1 year of additional follow-up (about 2.5 years of median follow-up), and an exploratory analysis of patients with confirmed Complete Response.

The PFS benefit with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab was maintained with an additional year of follow-up (12.5 versus 6.3 months; HR=0.48; P<0.00001). The OS benefit was also maintained with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab with a 49% reduction in the risk of death, when compared to platinum-based chemotherapy (33.8 versus 15.9 months; HR=0.51; P<0.00001). The PFS and OS benefit was observed across prespecified subgroups, including the Cisplatin-eligible and ineligible patients.

The ORR in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group was 67.5% versus 44.2% in the chemotherapy group (P<0.0.001) and the median Duration of Response was 23.3 months versus 7.0 months, respectively. A Complete Response was observed in 30.4% of patients treated with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab versus 14.5% among patients treated with chemotherapy. The median duration of Complete Response was not reached for Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab and 15.2 months for chemotherapy. The probability of maintaining a Complete Response at 2 years with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab was 74%. For patients with a confirmed Complete Response, the 2-year PFS and OS rates were 78% and 95% in the Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab group, respectively, versus 54% and 86% in the chemotherapy group, respectively.

It was concluded that, these data with longer follow up suggests that treatment with Enfortumab vedotin plus Pembrolizumab resulted in significantly superior outcomes, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, emerging as a potential new standard of care, irrespective of Cisplatin eligibility. The results from this study mark a significant paradigm shift in the management of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma, offering new hope for patients and clinicians alike.

EV-302: Updated analysis from the phase 3 global study of enfortumab vedotin in combination with pembrolizumab (EV+P) vs chemotherapy (chemo) in previously untreated locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC). Powles T, Van Der Heijden M, Loriot Y, et al. 2025 ASCO Genitourinary Cancers Symposium. Abstract 664. Journal of Clinical Oncology. Volume 43, Number 5_suppl February 2025.

Late Breaking Abstract – 2025 ASCO GI Symposium: Circulating Tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a Predictive Biomarker for Celecoxib Benefit in Stage III Colon Cancer: Insights from CALGB/SWOG 80702

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 154,270 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2025 and about 52,900 patients will die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

It is estimated that approximately 30% of patients with Stage II or III CRC and 60-70% of patients after oligometastatic resection experience recurrence. Adjuvant chemotherapy for patients with resected, locally advanced, node-positive (Stage III) colon cancer has been the standard of care since the 1990s. However, not all patients with Stage III disease benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy. In the IDEA trial, the absolute Disease Free Survival benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for the lowest-risk Stage III group and the highest-risk group was 8% and 20%, respectively, suggesting that a substantial number of patients with low-risk Stage III cancer can safely forgo adjuvant chemotherapy or be considered for treatment de-escalation.

More recent data suggests that platelets may play a role in tumorigenesis as well, through the release of angiogenic and growth factors due to overexpression of Cyclooxygenase 2 (COX-2). Aspirin and COX-2 inhibitors such as Celecoxib have been associated with a reduced risk of colorectal polyps and cancer in observational and randomized studies.

The CALGB/SWOG 80702 is a randomized Phase III trial conducted to determine if the addition of Celecoxib to adjuvant chemotherapy with Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) improves Disease-Free Survival (DFS) in patients with Stage III colon cancer. Patients were randomized to receive adjuvant FOLFOX (every 2 weeks) for 3 versus 6 months with or without 3 years of Celecoxib (400 mg orally daily; N=1263) versus placebo; N=1261). In this study, the addition of Celecoxib for 3 years to standard adjuvant chemotherapy did not significantly improve Disease-Free Survival (DFS).

The present analysis evaluated the prognostic and predictive value of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in identifying a subpopulation of patients in the above study, who may potentially benefit from Celecoxib therapy. A subset of 1,011 patients from the CALGB/SWOG 80702 trial with adequate biospecimen availability was included in this analysis. ctDNA status was assessed using a tumor-informed, clinically validated 16-plex multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction Next-Generation Sequencing (mPCR-NGS) assay (Signatera(TM), Natera, Inc.). Plasma samples were collected post-surgery and before the initiation of adjuvant chemotherapy. Survival outcomes, including DFS and Overall Survival (OS), were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional hazards models.

Results:

  • Of the 1,011 patients with ctDNA data, 189 (18.7%) tested ctDNA-positive.
  • ctDNA positivity correlated with male sex, advanced T stage, and N2 nodal disease.
  • Patients with detectable ctDNA had significantly worse outcomes:
    • DFS: Hazard Ratio (HR)=6.52; P<0.0001
    • OS: HR=6.28; P<0.0001
  • Three-year DFS rates were:
    • 6% in ctDNA-negative patients
    • 8% in ctDNA-positive patients
  • Celecoxib did not significantly impact DFS in ctDNA-negative patients (HR=0.75; P=0.095, 3-year DFS: 87.7% vs. 85.5%).
  • However, in ctDNA-positive patients, Celecoxib was associated with a notable improvement in DFS (HR=0.59; P=0.004, 3-year DFS: 44.1% vs. 26.6%).
  • OS trends mirrored those observed for DFS:
    • ctDNA-negative group: HR=0.86 (P=0.49) with Celecoxib versus placebo.
    • ctDNA-positive group: HR=0.63 (P=0.028) with Celecoxib versus placebo.
  • Multivariate analysis confirmed a statistically significant benefit of Celecoxib in ctDNA-positive patients.

Conclusion: ctDNA serves as a strong prognostic biomarker for both DFS and OS in Stage III colon cancer. Furthermore, ctDNA positivity appears to predict a significant therapeutic benefit from adjuvant Celecoxib, suggesting its potential role in stratifying patients for COX-2 inhibitor therapy. These findings highlight the utility of ctDNA assessment in guiding adjuvant treatment decisions and optimizing personalized therapeutic strategies in colon cancer.

Clinical Implications:

  • Post-surgical ctDNA testing can help identify patients at elevated risk of recurrence.
  • Celecoxib may offer a survival advantage for ctDNA-positive patients when used alongside standard FOLFOX chemotherapy.
  • Further research is warranted to elucidate the role of ctDNA-guided treatment in personalizing colon cancer therapy.

Prognostic and predictive role of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in stage III colon cancer treated with celecoxib: Findings from CALGB (Alliance)/SWOG 80702. Nowak JA, Shi Q, Twombly T, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2025;43(4):LBA14.

Advancing Prostate Cancer Treatment: The Efficacy of Primary Partial-Gland Cryoablation

RR

SUMMARY: Prostate cancer is the most common cancer in American men with the exclusion of skin cancer, and 1 in 8 men will be diagnosed with prostate cancer during their lifetime. It is estimated by the American Cancer Society that in the United States, about 313,780 new cases of prostate cancer will be diagnosed in 2025 and 35,770 men will die of the disease. The development and progression of prostate cancer is driven by androgens. Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) or testosterone suppression has therefore been the cornerstone of treatment of advanced prostate cancer and is the first treatment intervention.

Prostate cancer treatment has traditionally revolved around whole-gland procedures, primarily radical prostatectomy, which, while effective in cancer eradication, is often associated with significant adverse effects, including urinary incontinence, erectile dysfunction, and the absence of semen. However, advancements in focal therapy, particularly Primary Partial-Gland CryoAblation (PPGCA), present a promising alternative that mitigates these consequences while maintaining efficacy. Primary Partial-Gland Cryoablation is a minimally invasive treatment for prostate cancer that involves the focal application of ultra‐cold temperature that destroys only the cancerous part of the prostate gland by freezing and thawing the cancerous cells.

The introduction of multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (mpMRI) has significantly improved our ability to determine the size, location, and aggressiveness of prostate cancer, enabling better candidate selection for focal therapy.

To rigorously assess the effectiveness of PPGCA, a study conducted at NYU Langone Health between May 2017 and March 2024, enrolled 313 men diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer, with no out-of-field Gleason grade group 2 or more, gross extracapsular extension, or extreme apical disease on pre-treatment mpMRI. Of these, 91 patients were followed for at least five years to evaluate the long-term efficacy of PPGCA. An intensive follow-up regimen was implemented. Patients underwent PSA testing every six months and received mpMRIs at 6-12, 24, 42, and 60 months post-treatment. Initially, protocol biopsies were conducted at 6-12 and 24 months; however, these were discontinued after interim analysis revealed a low incidence of clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) recurrence, defined as Gleason grade group 2 or more disease. The Primary end point was Freedom-from-failure, defined as no prostate cancer-specific mortality, metastatic disease, or whole-gland salvage treatment.

Key Findings

Among the 91 patients monitored for at least five years:

  • Clinically significant Prostate Cancer (csPCa) was detected in 33 (10.5%) patients.
  • The freedom-from-recurrence rates at five years were:
    • In-field csPCa: 86%
    • Out-of-field csPCa: 85%
    • Overall csPCa: 70%
  • The overall freedom-from-failure rate at five years was 89%.
  • No patient succumbed to prostate cancer during the study period.
  • One patient (1%) developed metastatic disease.
  • 15 patients (16.5%) underwent whole-gland salvage treatment.
  • 15 patients (16.5%) received salvage focal therapy.
  • Patient compliance with the five-year surveillance protocol was exceptionally high, with only three patients (3.3%) deviating from scheduled monitoring.

Clinical Implications and Future Directions
The researchers emphasized that intermediate-risk patients were selected because, under conventional treatment paradigms, they would have been recommended for immediate whole-gland removal. The study suggests that 80% of men diagnosed with intermediate-risk prostate cancer may opt for focal cryotherapy over prostatectomy if given the choice, based on the effectiveness of treatment and reduced side effects.

The authors highlighted the comprehensive nature of this research, marking it as the largest prospective study of intermediate-risk prostate cancer treated with PPGCA. They reiterated the importance of rigorous follow-up and high patient compliance in ensuring accurate outcome assessment. As the study cohort matures, researchers aim to expand their evaluations to include lower-risk patients, who may not qualify for active surveillance but could benefit from less invasive alternatives to whole-gland treatment.

In conclusion, the current study demonstrated that PPGCA can effectively prevent cancer recurrence while avoiding the significant functional side effects of whole-gland removal. This study underscores the efficacy and feasibility of PPGCA as a viable alternative to prostatectomy, demonstrating very encouraging intermediate-term oncological outcomes. The high compliance rate with a rigorous surveillance protocol reinforces the potential of focal therapy in preserving quality of life while maintaining robust cancer control. Future research will focus on refining patient selection criteria and further validating long-term oncological and functional outcomes.

Five-year Oncologic Outcomes Following Primary Partial Gland Cryo-ablation Prospective Cohort Study of Men With Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer. Lepor H, Rapoport E, Tafa M, et al. Urology. 2025 Feb;196:189-195. 

Breakthroughs in Targeted Therapy for Low-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma

RR

Written by: Dr. Charles K Anderson, MD
Sponsored by Verastem

Low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (LGSOC) is a rare and molecularly distinct ovarian cancer accounting for <10% of new epithelial ovarian cancers.1,2 Recently, significant progress has been made with new therapy options currently in the developmental phase. LGSOC commonly presents at advanced stages, with over 70% of patients experiencing relapse.3  There is an indication of slower tumor progression, leading to an extended overall survival (OS) of around 97 months, in contrast to the 72 months typically seen in high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (HGSOC) cases.4 LGSOC patients tend to have a longer median progression-free survival (PFS) of 97 months, whereas HGSOC patients usually experience 35 months before progression.4 While LGSOC tends to progress slowly, the relatively young age of patients at diagnosis and their resistance to traditional cytotoxic therapy indicate that the majority will ultimately succumb to the disease.3,5,6 

Primary treatment for newly diagnosed patients typically involves primary debulking surgery (PDS) if feasible. The historical standard-of-care (SOC) treatment options include cytotoxic platinum and taxane based regiments often combined with bevacizumab or primary endocrine targeted therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors, selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) or selective estrogen receptor degraders (SERDs). In a study of 58 patients with recurrent LGSOC who were treated with a total of 108 cytotoxic regimens, a response rate of only 3.7% was observed with other combined data showing a response rate of 0-13%.3,5,6,7

Promising advancements in targeted therapies such as MEK inhibitors and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors with concurrent endocrine therapy, have exhibited potential in treating LGSOC with improved response rates. LGSOC tumors frequently exhibit activating mutations in the mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) pathway and lack TP53 mutations.8 Given that over 60% of LGSOC tumors carry RAS/RAF mutations, multiple phase 2/3 trials have explored the clinical effectiveness of mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) inhibitors in patients with recurrent or persistent LGSOC. Response rates of 26% and 16% were observed with trametinib and binimetinib, respectively, but with discontinuation rates of 36% and 31% due to toxicity.2,7

It has been realized that focal adhesion kinase (FAK) activation in the development of resistance to MEK inhibitors, the phase II trial RAMP201 assessed the effectiveness of avutometinib, a dual RAF/MEK inhibitor, administered alone and in combination with defactinib, a FAK inhibitor, for the treatment of recurrent LGSOC. This trial also included stratification by KRAS mutation status.3 In May of 2023, at the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the findings from the RAMP201 trial were unveiled, indicating an objective response rate (ORR) of 45% and tumor shrinkage in 86% of assessable patients who received the combination therapy of avutometinib and defactinib. The phase 3 confirmatory trial, RAMP 301, will evaluate the effectiveness of avutometinib and defactinib compared to SOC chemotherapy or hormone therapy options. These trials indicate that MAPK pathway inhibitors hold promise in offering clinical advantages to individuals with LGSOC.

 Avutometinib and Defactinib Mechanism of Action

  • Avutometinib is a first-in-class oral RAF/MEK clamp that potently inhibits MEK while also blocking the compensatory reactivation of MEK by upstream RAF1,4
  • Defactinib is a selective inhibitor of FAK, a key adaptive resistance mechanism to the RAS/MAPK pathway9,10,11
  • Phase 1 FRAME study (NCT03875820) demonstrated activity of avutometinib + defactinib study -led to FDA Breakthrough Therapy Designation and rationale for the phase 2 ENGOT-ov60/GOG-3052/RAMP 201 (NCT04625270) study12,13

Summary: RAMP 201: Registration-Directed Phase 2 Trial of Avutometinib ± Defactinib in Patients with Recurrent LGSOC

  • Patient selection: Recurrent LGSOC, prior platinum chemotherapy, measurable disease (RECIST v1.1), prior MEK inhibitor allowed
  • Primary Endpoint: ORR- In KRAS mt patients and all patients (KRAS mt & wt)
  • A go forward regimen was identified with 3 sub-part study with selection phase, expansion phase, expansion combination phase
  • Eventual combination dosing chosen was: Avutometinib 3.2 mg PO BIW and Defactinib 200 mg PO BID
    • ORR: 31% overall; 44% in KRAS mt and 17% in KRAS wt
    • Median DOR: 31 months overall
    • Median PFS: 12.9 months overall; 22.0 months in KRAS mt and 12.8 months in KRAS wt
  • Safety profile: toxicity was acceptable as most adverse events were grade 1 and 2. Adverse events were managed primarily with dose interruptions and reductions with only a 10% discontinuation rate of for adverse events
  • These data support the potential for avutometinib + defactinib as a new standard of care for recurrent LGSOC, regardless of KRAS status

 In conclusion, I am impressed with the results of RAMP 201 trial showing efficacy and tolerability much higher than historical controls comparing traditional cytotoxic therapy, endocrine therapy combinations and other MEK inhibitors.  I am optimistic and excited to see the results of the ongoing RAMP 301 trial (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06072781).

References:

  1. Lito, P., et al. (2014). Cancer Cell, 25(5), 697-710.
  2. Gershenson, D. M., Miller, A., Brady, W. E., Paul, J., Carty, K., Rodgers, W., Millan, D., Coleman, R. L., Moore, K. N., Banerjee, S., Connolly, K., Secord, A. A., O’Malley, D. M., Dorigo, O., Gaillard, S., Gabra, H., Slomovitz, B., Hanjani, P., Farley, J., & Churchman, M. (2022). Trametinib versus standard of care in patients with recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer (GOG 281/LOGS): An international, randomised, open-label, multicentre, phase 2/3 trial. The Lancet, 399(10324), 541–553. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)02175-9Zwimpfer, T. A., Tal, O., Geissler, F., Coelho, R., Rimmer, N., Jacob, F., & Heinzelmann-Schwarz, V. (2023). Low grade serous ovarian cancer – A rare disease with increasing therapeutic options. Cancer Treatment Reviews, 112, 102497. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctrv.2022.102497
  3. Gonzalez-Del Pino, G. L., et al. (2021). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118(36), e2107207118.
  4. Gershenson, D. M., Sun, C. C., Bodurka, D., Coleman, R. L., Lu, K. H., Sood, A. K., Deavers, M., Malpica, A. L., & Kavanagh, J. J. (2009). Recurrent low-grade serous ovarian carcinoma is relatively chemoresistant. Gynecologic Oncology, 114(1), 48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.001
  5. Gockley, A., Melamed, A., Bregar, A. J., Clemmer, J. T., Birrer, M., Schorge, J. O., del Carmen, M. G., & Rauh-Hain, J. A. (2017). Outcomes of women with high-grade and low-grade advanced-stage serous epithelial ovarian cancer. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 129(3), 439–447. https://doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001867
  6. Monk, B. J., et al. (2020). Journal of Clinical Oncology, 38(32), 3753–3762..
  7. Manning-Geist, B. L., et al. (2024). Clinical Advances in Hematology & Oncology, 22(5), 205–226.
  8. Vang, R., Shih, I. M., & Kurman, R. J. (2009). Ovarian low-grade and high-grade serous carcinoma: pathogenesis, clinicopathologic and molecular biologic features, and diagnostic problems. Advances in Anatomic Pathology, 16(5), 267-282. https://doi.org/10.1097/PAP.0b013e3181b4fffa.
  9. Dawson, J. C., et al. (2021). Nature Reviews Cancer, 21, 313–324
  10. Shinde, R., et al. (2020). Cancer Research, 80(Suppl 16), CT143.
  11. Kang, Y., et al. (2013). Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 105(19), 1485–1495
  12. Banerjee, S., et al. (2021). Annals of Oncology, 32(Suppl 5), S7.
  13. Verastem Oncology. (2021, May 24). Press release: Verastem Oncology receives breakthrough therapy designation for VS-6766 with defactinib in recurrent low-grade serous ovarian cancer. Retrieved September 28, 2023, from https://investor.verastem.com/node/12421/pdf.

 

Late Breaking Abstract – 2025 ASCO GI Symposium: Personalized Neoantigen Vaccine in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 154,270 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2025 and about 52,900 patients will die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

The majority of CRC cases (about 75 %) are sporadic whereas the remaining 25 % of the patients have a family history of the disease. Only 5-6 % of patients with CRC with a family history background are due to inherited mutations in major CRC genes, while the rest are the result of accumulation of both genetic mutations and epigenetic modifications of several genes. Colorectal Cancer is a heterogeneous disease classified by its genetics, and even though the diagnosis of Colorectal Cancer in the US is dropping among people 65 years and older, the incidence has been rising in the younger age groups, with 12% of Colorectal Cancer cases diagnosed in people under age 50.

The DNA MisMatchRepair (MMR) system is responsible for molecular surveillance and works as an editing tool that identifies errors within the microsatellite regions of DNA and removes them. Defective MMR system leads to MSI (Micro Satellite Instability) and hypermutation, with the expression of tumor-specific neoantigens at the surface of cancer cells, triggering an enhanced antitumor immune response. MSI is therefore a hallmark of defective/deficient DNA MisMatchRepair (dMMR) system and occurs in 15% of all colorectal cancers. MSI testing is performed using a PCR or NGS based assay and MSI-High refers to instability at 2 or more of the 5 mononucleotide repeat markers and MSI-Low refers to instability at 1 of the 5 markers. Patients are considered Micro Satellite Stable (MSS) if no instability occurs. MSI-L and MSS are grouped together because MSI-L tumors are uncommon and behave similar to MSS tumors.

Checkpoint inhibitors have revolutionized cancer treatment. They are however not as effective in patients with “cold tumors” (MSS), as these tumors effectively hide themselves from the immune system and do not trigger an immune response following treatment with checkpoint inhibitors.

GRANITE is a personalized neoantigen immunotherapy designed to trigger a strong T-cell immune response against a patient’s tumor. A biopsy of the tumor is performed to identify unique mutations (neoantigens) present in the tumor of patients. An AI platform, EDGE, developed and designed by Gritstone Bio is able to identify critical T-cell vaccine targets, and predict which neoantigens are most likely to be recognized by the immune system of patients. The system has an 80% accuracy rate in selecting the top 20 most immunogenic neoantigens, most likely to generate an immune response in a given patient. The selected neoantigens are incorporated into a chimpanzee adenovirus-based primer vaccine and a Self-Amplifying mRNA (SAM) booster vaccine to train the immune system that leads to an induction of both cytotoxic T-lymphocyte and memory T-cell dependent immune responses, that specifically target and destroy the patients cancer cells that express these neoantigens. This vaccine (GRANITE) is administered via intramuscular injection alongside immune checkpoint inhibitors. Thus GRANITE primes the immune system to recognize and attack these tumors. This vaccine is customized for each patient based on the unique mutations of their tumor. In essence, GRANITE helps make the “cold tumors” visible to the immune system, potentially improving patient outcomes.

GRANITE immunotherapy regimen was evaluated in combination with Nivolumab and Ipilimumab, and compared to the combination of Nivolumab and Ipilimumab alone in a Phase1/2 involving patients with advanced metastatic solid tumors. This study demonstrated robust T-cell activation against targeted neoantigens with no dose-limiting toxicities, and over 50% of patients had a reduction in their circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and improved Overall Survival (Palmer CD, et al. Nature 2022).

GRANITE immunotherapy regimen is now being studied as first line metastatic treatment in a randomized Phase 2 trial, among patients with Microsatellite-Stable (MSS) Colorectal cancer patients. GO-010 is an ongoing Phase 2/3, randomized, open-label, multi-center study evaluating the efficacy and safety of GRANITE immunotherapy regimen in combination with Checkpoint Inhibitors (CPIs) as an add-on to Fluoropyrimidine/Bevacizumab as maintenance treatment, following first line therapy with FOLFOX/Bevacizumab, in patients with mCRC. In this study, 104 patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio, and 67 patients were included in this treated analysis with 39 patients assigned to the GRANITE arm and 28 patients to the control arm. (36 patients withdrew from the study primarily due to early progressive disease or withdrawal of consent, and one patient has yet to begin study treatment). The vaccine manufacturing success rate was 100%. Both treatment groups were well balanced with regards to demographics, clinical characteristics stage, sidedness and presence of liver metastases. Approximately 75% of patients had liver metastases. For the Phase 2 portion of this study, the Primary end point being assessed is molecular response defined as 30% or more decrease from baseline in ctDNA. For the Phase 3 portion of this trial, the Primary end point is Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points for both Phase 2 and 3 include Adverse Events, Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DoR) and Clinical Benefit Rate.

Preliminary data from the Phase 2 portion of a Phase 2/3 study showed a positive early trend in PFS for GRANITE immunotherapy patients with a Hazard Ratio (HR) of 0.82 in all patients, HR of 0.52 in high-risk patients1 (more than 90% with liver metastases). The median PFS was 12 months with GRANITE immunotherapy versus 7 months for the control group. Long-term ctDNA responses aligned with positive PFS trend favoring GRANITE immunotherapy patients versus control patients.

In the high-risk group, between first blood draw (time of randomization) and last blood draw (most recent study visit), the ctDNA shifted from high (more than 2% VAF-Variant Allele Frequency) to low (2% or less VAF) in 56% of patients treated with GRANITE immunotherapy versus 22% of control patients. Progressive disease was observed in 44% versus 78% respectively, within this group.

In the low-risk group of patients whose ctDNA was negative after induction chemotherapy, sustained ctDNA negativity was observed in 67% of GRANITE immunotherapy recipients versus 38% in the control patients. Progressive disease was observed in 11% and 38% of these patients, respectively. GRANITE immunotherapy was well tolerated and vast majority of adverse events were Grade1/2 and no patients discontinued study treatment due to an adverse event.

In conclusion, this preliminary Phase 2 results are highly encouraging and suggested that GRANITE immunotherapy demonstrated positive early PFS and long-term ctDNA responses, compared with Fluoropyrimidine/Bevacizumab alone, in front-line metastatic MSS-Colorectal cancer, providing the rationale for a confirmatory Phase 3 trial.

A randomized phase 2 study of an individualized neoantigen-targeting immunotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic microsatellite stable colorectal cancer (MSS-CRC). Hecht JR, Spira AI, Nguyen AV, et al. J Clin Oncol 43, 2025 (suppl 4; abstr LBA13). DOI 10.1200/JCO.2025.43.4_suppl.LBA13