Category: Hem/Onc Updates

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: Docetaxel as Radiosensitizer Improves Overall Survival in Cisplatin-Ineligible Head and Neck cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the US for 2022, about 54,000 new cases of oral cavity or oropharyngeal cancer will be diagnosed and about 11,230 patients will die of the disease. Patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck, frequently present with locoregionally advanced disease. For patients in this setting, chemoradiotherapy is an effective non-surgical approach as primary treatment. Alternatively, chemoradiotherapy can be delivered as adjuvant therapy after a curative resection.

Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiation is generally accepted as the standard, definitive non-surgical and post-operative approach in selected patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. This treatment can however be associated with substantial morbidity and lifelong toxicities. Cetuximab is an immunoglobulin G1 chimeric monoclonal antibody against Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), and the only approved targeted agent in locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Cetuximab plus Radiotherapy significantly improved Overall Survival at 5 years, when compared with radiotherapy alone, in patients with locoregionally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (Lancet Oncol. 2010). Cetuximab plus Radiotherapy is therefore an important treatment option in this patient group. However, financial barriers make Cetuximab as a Cisplatin substitute, inaccessible to patients, in low and middle-income countries.

Docetaxel is a semisynthetic taxane that affects polymerized tubulin to promote microtubule formation and inhibit its disassembly. Docetaxel has been shown to have significant antitumor activity as a single agent in head and neck cancer, when given in the neoadjuvant setting. Docetaxel is also a potent radiosensitizer. The researchers evaluated Docetaxel as a radiosensitizer in this clinical trial.

The authors in this open-label, randomized, Phase III study enrolled 356 Cisplatin-ineligible patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, planned for treatment with radical or adjuvant chemoradiation. The patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive Radiation alone (N=176) or Radiation with concurrent Docetaxel 15 mg/m2 IV weekly for a maximum of 7 cycles (N=180). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 62 yrs, approximately 45% of patients had a ECOG Performance Status of 2, and reasons for Cisplatin ineligibility included low creatinine clearance (26%), and hearing loss (43%). Approximately 33% of patients had oral cavity cancer and about two-thirds of patients had Stage IVA disease. The FACT-G, and Head and Neck questionnaires were completed by patients at baseline, 6 months, 12 months and at 24 months. FACT-G (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-G) is a 27-item questionnaire designed to measure four domains of Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) in cancer patients, which includes physical, social, emotional, and functional well-being. The Primary endpoint was Disease Free Survival (DFS), and key Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), adverse events and Quality of Life.

It was noted that the 2-year DFS was 30.3% with Radiation alone versus 42% with Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy (HR=0.67; P=0.002). Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy also significantly improved Overall Survival. The median Overall Survival was 15.3 months with Radiation Therapy alone, versus 25.5 months in the Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy group (P=0.035). The 2 -year Overall Survival was also significantly higher in the Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy group and was 41.7% with Radiation Therapy alone, versus 50.8% in the Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy group (HR=0.74; P=0.035). These survival outcomes were observed across all preplanned subgroups.

Grade 3 or above adverse events were seen in 58% of patients receiving Radiation Therapy alone and in 81.6% of patients receiving Docetaxel plus Radiation Therapy. The addition of Docetaxel to Radiation Therapy resulted in a higher incidence of Grade 3 and above mucositis (49.7% versus 22.2%; P<0.001), odynophagia (52.5% versus 33.5%; P<0.001) and dysphagia (49.7% versus 33%; P<0.002). The addition of Docetaxel however did not lead to a worsening of Quality of Life, including Trial Outcome Index and FACT-G scores at 6 months.

The authors concluded that the addition of Docetaxel to Radiation Therapy improved Disease Free Survival and Overall Survival, in Cisplatin-ineligible locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and provides an evidence based, financially more viable treatment option, for this patient group.

Results of phase 3 randomized trial for use of docetaxel as a radiosensitizer in patients with head and neck cancer unsuitable for cisplatin-based chemoradiation. Patil VM, Noronha V, Menon NS, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA6003 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 17_suppl (June 10, 2022) LBA6003.

ADCETRIS® Improves Overall Survival in Stage III or IV Hodgkin’s Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States for 2022, about 8,540 new cases of Hodgkin lymphoma will be diagnosed and about 920 patients will die of the disease. Hodgkin lymphoma is classified into two main groups – Classical Hodgkin lymphomas and Nodular Lymphocyte Predominant type, by the World Health Organization. The Classical Hodgkin lymphomas include Nodular sclerosing, Mixed cellularity, Lymphocyte rich, Lymphocyte depleted subtypes and accounts for approximately 10% of all malignant lymphomas. Nodular sclerosis Hodgkin lymphoma histology, accounts for approximately 80% of Hodgkin lymphoma cases in older children and adolescents in the United States. Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma is a malignancy of primarily B lymphocytes and is characterized by the presence of large mononucleated Hodgkin (H) and giant multinucleated Reed-Sternberg (RS) cells, collectively known as Hodgkin and Reed-Sternberg cells (HRS).

For patients with Hodgkin Lymphoma, the goal of first-line chemotherapy is cure. A positive PET scan following first-line chemotherapy is indicative of incomplete response with residual disease and warrants subsequent chemotherapy or radiation. Advanced stage (Stage III-IV) Classical Hodgkin lymphoma has a cure rate of approximately 70-80% when treated in the first-line setting with a combination of Doxorubicin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine, and Dacarbazine (ABVD). This regimen which was developed more than 40 years ago is less expensive, easy to administer, is generally well tolerated and is often used in first line setting. Nonetheless, this regimen which contains Bleomycin can cause pulmonary toxicity, the incidence of which is higher in older patients and in those who receive consolidation radiotherapy to the thorax.

Response-adapted therapy involves the administration of 2 cycles of chemotherapy with ABVD regimen, followed by an interim PET scan, which serves as the basis for either intensifying or de-escalating therapy. If PET negative after the second cycle, patients receive 4 additional cycles of AVD omitting Bleomycin from the ABVD regimen. Radiotherapy is not recommended for patients with negative findings on interim PET scans. This response-adapted therapy resulted in lower incidence of pulmonary toxicities, compared with continued treatment with ABVD, without compromising efficacy (NEJM 2016; 374:2419-2429).

ADCETRIS® (Brentuximab vedotin) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) that targets CD30, which is a surface antigen, expressed on Reed-Sternberg cells, in patients with Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. This ADC consists of an anti-CD30 monoclonal antibody linked to MonoMethyl Auristatin E (MMAE), an antimicrotubule agent. Upon binding to the CD30 molecule on the cancer cells, MMAE is released into the cancer cell, resulting in cell death. In a previously published Phase I study, ADCETRIS® in combination with AVD (A+AVD) resulted in a Complete Response rate of 96% and a 5 year Overall Survival rate of 100%. Based on these finding, ECHELON-1 study was conducted, which is an international, open-label, randomized, multicenter, Phase III trial, comparing A+AVD with ABVD, as frontline therapy in patients with Stage III or IV Classical Hodgkin lymphoma. The goal of this study was to maintain the high probability of cure, while reducing the incidence of toxic effects.

ECHELON-1 study included 1334 previously untreated patients with Stage III or IV Classical Hodgkin lymphoma, who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive A+AVD (N=664), which consisted of ADCETRIS® 1.2 mg/kg , Doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, Vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and Dacarbazine 375 mg/m2 or ABVD (N=670), which consisted of Doxorubicin 25 mg/m2, Bleomycin 10 units/m2, Vinblastine 6 mg/m2 and Dacarbazine 375 mg/m2, given intravenously, on days 1 and 15 of each 28-day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Both treatment groups were well balanced and approximately 14% of the patients in the trial were 60 years of age or older. The use of Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor (G-CSF), which was initially permitted according to institutional guidelines, was subsequently recommended after an increased incidence of febrile neutropenia with A+AVD therapy during an interim safety analysis. The Primary end point was “modified” Progression Free Survival (mPFS), which, in addition to disease progression or death, included less than Complete Response after the completion of frontline chemotherapy, based on independently assessed PET results. PET scan interpretation was based on Deauville score (The Deauville score is a 5-point scale on which higher scores indicate greater uptake of FDG glucose at involved sites on PET). Patients were stratified according to International Prognostic Score (IPS) risk group (Low risk versus Intermediate risk versus High risk). A PET scan was performed at the end of the second cycle of treatment (PET2) and patients were offered alternative frontline therapy at the discretion of the treating physician, for patients with a PET Deauville score of 5. Secondary end points included Overall Survival.

At a median follow up of 73.0 months, the analysis of Overall Survival significantly favored A+AVD over ABVD across various subgroups (HR for death=0.59; P=0.009). The 6-year Overall Survival estimates were 93.9% in the A+AVD group and 89.4% in the ABVD group. Progression Free Survival (PFS) outcomes also favored A+AVD over ABVD and the 6-year PFS estimates were 82.3% with A+AVD and 74.5% with ABVD (HR for disease progression or death=0.68). The PFS estimates again favored A+AVD over ABVD across various subgroups, including subgroups defined according to disease Stage (III or IV) and PET2-negative status. Further, fewer patients in the A+AVD group than in the ABVD group received subsequent therapy, including transplantation. Fewer second cancers were reported with A+AVD, but more patients had peripheral neuropathy with A+AVD than with ABVD. However, majority of patients in both treatment groups had resolution or amelioration of neuropathy by the last follow up.

It was concluded from the ECHELON-1 study that, after a median follow up of 6 years, treatment with ADCETRIS® in combination with Doxorubicin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (A+AVD) resulted in a significant improvement both in Progression Free Survival as well as Overall Survival.

Overall Survival with Brentuximab Vedotin in Stage III or IV Hodgkin’s Lymphoma. Ansell SM, Radford J, Connors JM, et al. for the ECHELON-1 Study Group. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:310-320.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: Improved Distant Metastasis-Free Survival with Adjuvant KEYTRUDA® in High Risk Stage II Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society’s estimates that for 2022, about 99,780 new cases of melanoma of the skin will be diagnosed in the United States and 7,650 people are expected to die of the disease. The rates of melanoma have been rising rapidly over the past few decades, but this has varied by age. Surgical resection with a curative intent is the standard of care for patients with early stage melanoma, with a 5-year survival rate of 98% for Stage I disease and 90% for Stage II disease. The current standard of care for patients following resection of high-risk Stage II disease is observation, even though patients with Stage IIB and IIC disease presenting with high-risk features (depth of invasion, T-category, ulceration) have 5 and 10 year melanoma-specific survival similar to that of patients with Stage IIIA and IIIB disease.

KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2. By doing so, it unleashes the tumor-specific effector T cells, and is thereby able to undo PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response. The FDA in 2019, approved KEYTRUDA® for the adjuvant treatment of patients with melanoma, with involvement of lymph node(s), following complete resection (Stage III). The present study was conducted to evaluate the role of adjuvant immunotherapy in patients with high risk Stage II melanoma.

KEYNOTE-716 is a randomized, double-blind, Phase III trial, in which 976 patients aged 12 years or older, with completely resected cutaneous Stage IIB or IIC melanoma, and no lymph node involvement, were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive KEYTRUDA® 200 mg IV (2 mg/kg for pediatric patients) or placebo, every 3 weeks for 17 cycles (up to 1 year). Patients were stratified by T category 3b, 4a, 4b (adults) and with a separate stratum for pediatric patients. Approximately 65% had Stage IIB disease and 35% had Stage IIC disease. There was no prespecified analysis for PD-L1 or BRAF status in this study, as there was inconsistent and small amounts of tissue available for testing. This was the first part (Part 1) of this double-blind study. The Primary endpoint was Relapse Free Survival (RFS) per investigator assessment, and Safety. The second part (Part 2) of this study was open-label design, and adults and pediatric patients were eligible to receive up to 35 additional cycles of treatment, only if they had recurrence after receiving the placebo or completed 17 cycles of KEYTRUDA®. Patients in the KEYTRUDA® group who experienced disease recurrence within 6 months of completing the treatment were excluded from Part 2 of the study. Secondary end points included Distant Metastasis Free Survival (DMFS), Overall Survival (OS) and Quality of Life.

At median follow up of 14.4 months, adjuvant KEYTRUDA® significantly prolonged RFS compared to placebo (HR=0.65; P=0.00658), in patients with resected Stage IIB or IIC melanoma. At the time of this analysis, 11.1% of patients on KEYTRUDA® had a recurrence, compared to 16.8% of those receiving placebo. The 12-month RFS rate was 90.5% for KEYTRUDA® versus 83.1% for placebo.

The researchers herein presented new data from the analysis of Distant Metastasis-Free Survival (DMFS) and Recurrence Free Survival (RFS), with a longer median follow up of 26.9 months. Adjuvant KEYTRUDA® significantly improved DMFS when compared to placebo (HR=0.64; P=0.0029), representing a 36% reduction in the risk of recurrence. The 24-month DMFS rate was 88.1% versus 82.2%, respectively. Grade 3 or more Adverse Events occurred in 28.4% of patients in the KEYTRUDA® group, versus 20% in the placebo group. Hypothyroidism was the most common immune mediated Adverse Event with KEYTRUDA®, compared to placebo (17.2% versus 3.7%).

The authors concluded that adjuvant KEYTRUDA® for resected Stage IIB and IIC melanoma, significantly improved Distant Metastasis-Free Survival, with continued reduction in the risk of recurrence, and a favorable benefit-risk profile. KEYNOTE-716 is the first randomized Phase III trial of an anti-PD-1 therapy in resected Stage II melanoma, and these findings represent an important milestone for this patient group.

Distant metastasis-free survival with pembrolizumab versus placebo as adjuvant therapy in stage IIB or IIC melanoma: The phase 3 KEYNOTE-716 study. Long GV, Luke JJ, Khattak M, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA9500 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 17_suppl (June 10, 2022) LBA9500-LBA9500.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: RUBRACA® Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: It is estimated that in the United States, approximately 19,880 women will be diagnosed with ovarian cancer in 2022 and 12,810 women will die of the disease. Ovarian cancer ranks fifth in cancer deaths among women, and accounts for more deaths than any other cancer of the female reproductive system. Approximately 75% of the ovarian cancer patients are diagnosed with advanced disease. Approximately 85% of all ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, and approximately 70% of all epithelial ovarian cancers are High-Grade Serous adenocarcinomas. Patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer are often treated with platinum based chemotherapy following primary surgical cytoreduction. Approximately 70% of these patients will relapse within the subsequent 3 years and are incurable, with a 5 year Overall Survival rate of about 20-30%.

DNA damage is a common occurrence in daily life by UV light, ionizing radiation, replication errors, chemical agents, etc. This can result in single and double strand breaks in the DNA structure which must be repaired for cell survival. The two vital pathways for DNA repair in a normal cell are BRCA1/BRCA2 and PARP. BRCA1 and BRCA2 are tumor suppressor genes and they recognize and repair double strand DNA breaks via Homologous Recombination (HR) pathway. Homologous Recombination is a DNA repair pathway utilized by cells to accurately repair DNA double-stranded breaks during the S and G2 phases of the cell cycle, and thereby maintain genomic integrity.

Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD) is noted following mutation of genes involved in HR repair pathway. At least 15 genes are involved in the Homologous Recombination Repair (HRR) pathway including BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes. Mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2 account for about 20-25% of hereditary breast cancers 15% of ovarian cancers, in addition to other cancers such as colon and prostate. BRCA mutations can either be inherited (Germline) and present in all individual cells or can be acquired and occur exclusively in the tumor cells (Somatic).

The PARP (Poly ADP Ribose Polymerase) family of enzymes includes PARP1 and PARP2, and is a related enzymatic pathway that repairs single strand breaks in DNA. In a BRCA mutant, the cancer cell relies solely on PARP pathway for DNA repair to survive. PARP inhibitors traps PARP onto DNA at sites of single-strand breaks, thereby preventing their repair and generate double-strand breaks. These breaks cannot be repaired accurately in tumors harboring defects in Homologous Recombination Repair pathway genes, such as BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, and this leads to cumulative DNA damage and tumor cell death.

RUBRACA® is an oral, small molecule PARP inhibitor, developed for treatment of ovarian cancer associated with Homologous Recombination DNA repair deficiency (HRD). With regards to ovarian cancer, RUBRACA® is presently approved by the FDA for the maintenance treatment of patients with recurrent epithelial ovarian, fallopian tube, or primary peritoneal cancer, who are in a Complete or Partial Response to platinum-based chemotherapy.

ATHENA is an international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III trial, which evaluated first-line maintenance treatment for patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. ATHENA was designed to evaluate RUBRACA® first-line maintenance treatment in a broad group of patients, including those without BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) mutations or other evidence of Homologous Recombination Deficiency (HRD), or high-risk clinical characteristics such as residual disease. ATHENA study has two separate and fully independently powered comparisons evaluating RUBRACA® monotherapy (ATHENA–MONO) and RUBRACA® plus Nivolumab (ATHENA–COMBO), as maintenance treatment in this patient population. The authors herein reported the efficacy and safety results from the ATHENA–MONO comparison of RUBRACA® maintenance treatment versus placebo.

In the ATHENA-MONO trial, patients with Stage III-IV high-grade ovarian cancer undergoing surgical cytoreduction (R0/complete resection permitted) and responding to 4-8 cycles of first-line platinum-doublet chemotherapy, were randomly assigned 4:1 to receive RUBRACA® 600 mg orally twice daily (N=427) or placebo. Treatment was continued for 24 months or until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients were stratified by HRD test status, residual disease after chemotherapy, and timing of surgery (primary surgery versus interval debulking). The median age was 61 years, majority of the patients (78%) did not have a BRCA mutation. Patients were stratified by HRD classification (BRCA wild-type/LOH (Loss of Heterozygosity) high-16% or more, BRCA wild-type/LOH low-less than 16%, and BRCA wild-type/LOH indeterminate). The Primary end point of investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS) was assessed in a step-down procedure, first in the HRD population (BRCA-mutant or BRCA wild-type/LOH high tumor), and then in the Intent-To-Treat (ITT) population. Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), investigator-assessed Objective Response Rate (ORR) in patients with measurable disease at baseline and Duration of Response (DOR) for patients with investigator-assessed confirmed radiographic Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR). The median duration of follow was 26 months.

The median PFS in the HRD population was 28.7 months with RUBRACA® maintenance group compared to 11.3 months with placebo (HR=0.47; P=0.0004). In the Intent to Treat (ITT) population, the median PFS was 20.2 months in the RUBRACA® group versus 9.2 months in the placebo group (HR=0.52; P<0.0001). At 24 months, 45% of RUBRACA®-treated patients in the ITT population were progression-free compared with 25.4% with placebo. In the HRD negative population, the median PFS was 12.1 months in the RUBRACA® group versus 9.1 months in the placebo group (HR=0.65). Exploratory subgroup analyses of PFS in the ITT population showed that there was greater clinical benefit with RUBRACA® compared to placebo among all subgroups, including BRCA-mutant, BRCA wild-type/LOH high, and BRCA wild-type/LOH low (HRD-negative).

Among RUBRACA®-treated patients with measurable disease at baseline, the ORR, was 58.8% in the HRD population and 48.8% in the ITT population. Among the placebo-treated patients, the ORR was 20% in the HRD population and 9.1% in the ITT population. The median Duration of Response in the HRD and ITT populations for RUBRACA®-treated responders versus the placebo-treated responders respectively, was 16.7 months versus 5.5 months and 22.1 months versus 5.5 months. The Overall Survival results were immature at the time of the data cutoff. The most common Grade 3 or more adverse events in the RUBRACA® group were anemia (29%) and neutropenia 15%).

The authors concluded that in the ATHENA-MONO trial, RUBRACA® monotherapy is an effective first-line maintenance option that provides clinical benefit to a broad population of patients with newly diagnosed ovarian cancer, regardless of BRCA mutation and HRD status.

A Randomized, Phase III Trial to Evaluate Rucaparib Monotherapy as Maintenance Treatment in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Ovarian Cancer (ATHENA–MONO/GOG-3020/ENGOT-ov45). Monk BJ, Parkinson C, Lim MC, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA5500 Journal of Clinical Oncology 40, no. 17_suppl (June 10, 2022) LBA5500-LBA5500. Published online June 08, 2022.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: Nimotuzumab Significantly Improves Overall Survival in K-Ras Wild-Type Advanced Pancreatic Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2022, about 62,210 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 49,830 people will die of the disease. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and Western Europe. Unfortunately, unlike other malignancies, very little progress has been made and outcome for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been dismal, with a 5-year survival rate for metastatic pancreatic cancer of approximately 10%. Pancreatic cancer has surpassed breast cancer as the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is on track to surpass colorectal cancer, to move to the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States.

Majority of patients with pancreatic cancer (80% of cases) are diagnosed at an advanced stage, and are not amenable to curative surgical resection, at the time of diagnosis. The current treatment regimens for advanced disease have proved ineffective, conferring a median Overall Survival (OS) of 6-8 months. In patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, the main driver is the KRAS oncogene, which is mutationally activated in over 90% of cases, and is more common in older (50 years or more) and female patients. However approximately 8-12% of patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma do not harbor KRAS mutations.

Nimotuzumab is a humanized anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, that binds to EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) and disrupts the interaction of the EGFR with its ligand, specifically blocking the EGFR signaling pathway, and mediating Antibody-Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and other immune effects, and inducing EGFR endocytosis and degradation. Nimotuzumab as a single agent showed activity in high grade brain tumors, and resulted in high rates of antitumor response in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck, when combined with radiation therapy. Nimotuzumab is approved in different countries for the treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck (SCCHN), Glioma and Nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

NOTABLE is a prospective, double-blind, Phase III trial in which the efficacy and safety of Nimotuzumab in combination with Gemcitabine was compared with Gemcitabine alone, in patients with KRAS wild-type, locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. In this study, 92 patients with locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer were randomly assigned to receive either Nimotuzumab 400 mg IV every week followed by Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m2 IV on days 1, 8, and 15 of every 28-day cycle or placebo plus Gemcitabine. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 56 years and approximately 56% had prior surgical management or treatment of biliary duct obstruction. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS), and Secondary endpoints included Progression Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), and Safety. The researchers envisioned that patients who did not need surgical management or treatment of biliary duct obstruction, typically would have better liver function without jaundice, and therefore would better tolerate chemotherapy. A subgroup analyses was therefore conducted based on whether the patients needed surgical management or treatment of bile duct obstructions prior to receiving chemotherapy.

The median Overall Survival was significantly longer in the Nimotuzumab/Gemcitabine group compared to those who received placebo plus Gemcitabine (10.9 months versus 8.5 months; HR=0.50; P=0.025). The one-year survival rate was 43.6% in the Nimotuzumab/Gemcitabine group versus 26.8% in the placebo-Gemcitabine group and the 3-year survival rate was 13.9% and 2.7%, respectively. The median Progression Free Survival was 4.2 months in the Nimotuzumab/Gemcitabine group compared to 3.6 months in the placebo plus Gemcitabine group (HR=0.56; P=0.013).

Among those patients who did not need surgical management or treatment of biliary duct obstruction, subgroup analyses showed significantly more survival benefit in patients without treatment of biliary obstruction (11.9 months versus. 8.5 months; HR=0.54; P=0.037) and among those with no surgical history (15.8 months versus 6.0 months; HR=0.40). Patients without treatment of biliary obstruction also had a significantly longer PFS (5.5 months versus 3.4 months; P=0.008) respectively. There was no statistical difference in the Objective Response Rates between the two treatment groups (P>0.05). Grade 3 adverse events in the Nimotuzumab/Gemcitabine group were neutropenia (11%), leukopenia (9%) and thrombocytopenia (7%). No Grade 4 adverse events were noted.

It was concluded that Nimotuzumab in combination with Gemcitabine, significantly increased Overall Survival and Progression Free Survival, in patients with K-Ras wild-type locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer. This benefit was even more in patients who did not need surgical management or treatment of biliary duct obstruction.

Nimotuzumab combined with gemcitabine versus gemcitabine in K-RAS wild-type locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer: A prospective, randomized-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter, and phase III clinical trial. Qin S, Bai Y, Wang Z, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 17):LBA4011. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA4011.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab in Unresectable Colorectal Cancer with Liver Metastases

RR

SUMMARY: ColoRectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 151,030 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2022 and about 52,580 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23.

Approximately 15-25% of the patients with CRC present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (synchronous metastases) and 50-60% of the patients with CRC will develop metastatic disease during the course of their illness. First line treatment of metastatic CRC include Oxaliplatin or Irinotecan, in combination with a Fluoropyrimidine and Leucovorin (FOLFOX or FOLFIRI), along with a VEGF targeting agent such as Bevacizumab. Patients with stage IV colorectal cancer are now routinely analyzed for extended RAS and BRAF mutations. KRAS mutations are predictive of resistance to EGFR targeted therapy. Approximately 8-15% of all metastatic CRC tumors present with BRAF V600E mutations and BRAF V600E is recognized as a marker of poor prognosis in this patient group. These patients tend to have aggressive disease and do not respond as well to standard treatment intervention. Approximately 20% of the BRAF-mutated population in the metastatic setting has MSI-High tumors, but MSI-High status does not confer protection to this patient group. Colorectal cancer patients with unresectable liver-only metastases at the time of initial presentation may potentially be cured, after downsizing of metastases by neoadjuvant systemic therapy. However, the optimal neoadjuvant induction regimen has not been defined.

CAIRO5 is a prospective, randomized, multicentre, Phase III trial, conducted to investigate the optimal systemic induction therapy for patients with initially unresectable, liver-only colorectal cancer metastases. In this study, 294 patients were randomized to receive either FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab (N=148), or FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab (N=146) for up to 12 cycles. Bevacizumab was given at a dose of 5 mg/kg IV. FOLFOX/FOLFIRI regimen consisted of either Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV or Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV, given along with Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 120 minutes, 5-Flourouracil (5-FU) 400 mg/m2 IV, followed by 5-FU 2400 mg/m2 given as an IV infusion over 46 hours. FOLFOXIRI regimen consisted of Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV, Irinotecan 165 mg/m2 IV, given along with Leucovorin 400 mg/m2 IV over 120 minutes, followed by 5-FU 3200 mg/m2 given as an IV infusion over 46 hours. Treatment was given every 2 weeks for a maximum of 12 cycles, followed by 5-FU, Leucovorin and Bevacizumab maintenance until disease progression. Enrolled patients had metastatic CRC with previously untreated liver-only metastases, (un)resectability status was prospectively assessed by a central panel consisting of radiologists and liver surgeons, according to predefined criteria, and patients were assessed for resectability every 2 months. Eligible patients had right-sided primary tumor and/or RAS or BRAF V600E mutated tumor. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median age was 63 years, 41% had right-sided primary tumor, 86% of tumors had RAS mutation, 7% had BRAF V600E mutation, 5% had prior adjuvant chemotherapy, the median number of colorectal liver metastases was 12, and 87% had potentially resectable colorectal metastases. Patients were stratified by potentially resectable versus permanently unresectable colorectal liver metastases, BRAFV600E mutation, sidedness and choice of Irinotecan versus Oxaliplatin. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints included R0/1 resection, Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), toxicity, pathologic response and postoperative morbidity.

At a median follow up of 41 months, the median PFS was 9.0 months with doublet regimen FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab versus 10.6 months with the triplet regimen of FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab. (HR=0.74; P=0.02). The ORR was 32% in the FOLFOX/FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab group versus 52.1% in the FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab group (P<0.001), R0/1 resection/ ablation rates were 37.4% versus 51.4% (P=0.02), and postoperative complications occurred in 38.2% versus 51.2% (P=0.14), respectively. Overall Survival data was immature at the time of data cutoff. Grade 3 or more adverse events, including neutropenia and diarrhea, were more common in the FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab group.

It was concluded that in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastasis and right-sided and/or RAS or BRAF-mutated primary tumor, the triplet regimen of FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab resulted in superior Progression Free Survival, a higher Objective Response Rate, and a greater chance for R0/R1 hepatic metastasectomy with or without ablation, compared to doublet chemotherapy with FOLFOX or FOLFIRI plus Bevacizumab. This benefit with the triplet regimen was achieved at the cost of increased toxicity, suggesting that careful patient selection should be made for the triplet regimen.

FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab versus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI + bevacizumab in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and right-sided and/or RAS/BRAFV600E-mutated primary tumor: Phase III CAIRO5 study of the Dutch Colorectal Cancer Group. Punt CJA, Bond MJG, Bolhuis K, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 17):LBA3506.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: RVd Plus Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation and REVLIMID® Maintenance Improves PFS in Multiple Myeloma

RR

SUMMARY: Multiple Myeloma is a clonal disorder of plasma cells in the bone marrow and the American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States, 34,470 new cases will be diagnosed in 2022 and 12,640 patients will die of the disease. Multiple Myeloma is a disease of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years and characterized by intrinsic clonal heterogeneity. Almost all patients eventually will relapse, and patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile, extramedullary disease or refractory disease have the worst outcomes. The introduction of Proteasome Inhibitors, immunomodulatory agents and CD 38 targeted therapies has resulted in higher Response Rates, as well as longer Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), with the median survival for patients with myeloma approaching 10 years or more. Nonetheless, Multiple Myeloma (MM) in 2022 remains an incurable disease.

In patients with newly diagnosed Myeloma who are eligible for transplant, the optimal use of triplet/quadruplet induction regimens, Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT), and REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide)-based maintenance, continues to evolve. In the IFM 2009 French trial, REVLIMID® maintenance treatment was admininstered for one year and after a median follow-up of 89.8 months, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) was 47.2 months with RVd plus ASCT and 35 months with RVd alone, but there was no Overall Survival (OS) benefit.

DETERMINATION ((Delayed vs Early Transplant with Revlimid Maintenance and Antimyeloma Triple Therapy) trial is a randomized Phase III trial, conducted to determine whether Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation (ASCT) enhances the efficacy of first line triplet induction therapy or whether it should be kept in reserve for select group of patients. In this study, 722 patients with symptomatic newly diagnosed Myeloma were enrolled. All patients received 3 cycles of RVd followed by stem cell mobilization (for possible ASCT if disease progressed). Patients were then randomly assigned to receive 5 additional cycles of RVd (RVd-alone arm, N=357) or Melphalan at 200 mg/m2, followed by ASCT and 2 additional cycles of RVd (RVd+ASCT arm, N=365). Each RVd cycle consisted of REVLIMID® 25 mg orally on days 1-14, VELCADE® (Bortezomib) 1.3 mg/m2 IV or SC on days 1, 4, 8, 11, and Dexamethasone given orally on days 1, 2, 4, 5, 8, 9, 11, 12, given as 21 day cycles. Dexamethasone was dosed at 20 mg/day for first 3 cycles and 10 mg/day for remaining cycles. Both treatment groups then received REVLIMID® maintenance at 10-15 mg orally daily, until disease progression or drug related toxicities. Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median age of enrolled patients was 56 years, approximately 14% of patients had ISS Stage III Multiple Myeloma and 18% had high-risk cytogenetics such as t(4;14), t(14;16), del17p. Approximately 19% of trial participants were African American, which is the highest representation of this subset of patients in any Phase III Myeloma trial. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points included Response Rates, Duration of Response (DOR), time to progression, Overall Survival (OS), Quality of Life, and Safety.

At a median follow up of 76 months, the median PFS was 46.2 months in the RVd alone group versus 67.6 months in the RVd plus ASCT group (HR=1.53; P<0.0001). The estimated 5-year PFS rates were 41.5% and 55.6% respectively. The 5 year Overall Survival was similar and not statistically different and was 79.2% and 80.7% respectively. The authors attributed the lack of Overall Survival in the RVd plus ASCT group to the availability of many highly effective treatment options now available after first-line therapy including salvage ASCT, next-generation immunomodulatory drugs, Proteasome Inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies.

When evaluated by cytogenetic risk, for the standard risk group, the median PFS was 82.3 months in the RVd plus ASCT group versus 53.2 months in the RVd alone group, whereas for patients with high risk cytogenetics, the median PFS was 55.5 versus 17.1 months, respectively. Further, patients with t(4;14) derived more PFS benefit from RVd plus ASCT than those with del(17p). The PFS benefit with RVd plus ASCT was inferior among the African American enrollees and individuals with a Body Mass Index greater than 25 kg/m2.

Even though the Response Rates and quality of responses were similar between the two treatment groups, the Duration of Response was longer in the RVd plus ASCT group at 56.4 months, compared to 39.9 months in the RVd alone group.

More patients in the RVd plus ASCT group achieved MRD (Minimal Residual Disease) negativity compared to RVD alone (54.4% versus 39.8%), despite similar Complete Response Rates in both treatment groups. These MRD negative patients had favorable 5-year PFS, regardless of their treatment assignment. However, RVd plus ASCT improved PFS by 67% among the MRD positive patients.

Grade 3 or greater treatment-related adverse effects including mucositis, fatigue, and infections were less common without ASCT than with, at 78% versus 94% respectively. Secondary malignancies occurred in 10% of the RVd-alone group and 11% of the RVd plus ASCT group. Following RVd plus ASCT, 10 patients developed Myelodysplastic syndrome and/or Acute Myeloid Leukemia, compared with none in the RVd-alone group, and this was statistically significant (P=0.002).

The authors concluded that a combination of REVLIMID®, VELCADE® and Dexamethasone (RVd) plus ASCT as initial therapy followed by REVLIMID® maintenance until progression, demonstrated a significant improvement in PFS compared to RVd alone, followed by REVLIMID® maintenance, in patients with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma. There was no Overall Survival advantage observed to date. The researchers added that given the lack of benefit in OS and potential toxicities associated with ASCT, these data provide support for personalized treatment approaches, and helps patients make informed decision to delay transplant. Additionally, the significantly longer PFS for both treatment groups in the DETERMINATION study compared to the IFM 2009 (preplanned comparison), suggests that there is a clear benefit to continuous REVLIMID® maintenance until disease progression.

Lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) ± autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and R maintenance to progression for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): The phase 3 DETERMINATION trial. Richardson PG, Jacobus SJ, Weller E, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2022;40(suppl 17):LBA4. doi:10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA4

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: ENHERTU® for HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 290,560 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and about 43,780 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence.

It is estimated that approximately 60% of metastatic breast cancers categorized as HER2-negative express low levels of HER2, defined as a score of 1+ on ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) analysis or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on In Situ Hybridization (ISH). These HER2-low breast cancer tumors are treated as HER2-negative, as currently available HER2-directed therapies have resulted in poor outcomes. These patients have limited targeted treatment options and are often treated with single agent palliative chemotherapy following progression on first line chemotherapy.

ENHERTU® (Trastuzumab Deruxtecan) is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) composed of a humanized monoclonal antibody specifically targeting HER2, with the amino acid sequence similar to Trastuzumab, a cleavable tetrapeptide-based linker, and a potent cytotoxic Topoisomerase I inhibitor as the cytotoxic drug (payload). ENHERTU® has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile and the tetrapeptide-based linker is stable in the plasma and is selectively cleaved by cathepsins that are up-regulated in tumor cells. Unlike KADCYLA® (ado-Trastuzumab emtansine), ENHERTU® has a higher drug-to-antibody ratio (8 versus 4), released payload easily crosses the cell membrane with resulting potent cytotoxic effect on neighboring tumor cells regardless of target expression, and the released cytotoxic agent (payload) has a short half-life , thus minimizing systemic exposure. The potential activity of ENHERTU® in HER2-low breast cancer tumors is driven by the bystander antitumor effect, offered by the optimized ADC technology. Previously published Phase I and II trials have shown that ENHERTU® in heavily pretreated patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer resulted in an Overall Response Rate of 37%, and median Progression Free Survival ranging from 6.3 to 11.1 months.

DESTINY-Breast04 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, Phase III trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ENHERTU® as compared with the physician’s choice of chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer. In this study, patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive ENHERTU® 5.4 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks (N=373) or the physician’s choice of Capecitabine, Eribulin, Gemcitabine, Paclitaxel, or Nab-paclitaxel (N=184). Low expression of HER2 was defined as a score of 1+ on ImmunoHistoChemical (IHC) analysis or as an IHC score of 2+ and negative results on In Situ Hybridization (ISH). Randomization was stratified according to HER2-low status (IHC 1+ versus IHC 2+ and ISH-negative), the number of previous lines of chemotherapy for metastatic disease (one versus two), and Hormone Receptor (HR) status (positive versus negative) and if positive, previous CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy versus no CDK4/6 inhibitor therapy. IHC scores for HER2 expression were determined through central testing with the use of VENTANA HER2/neu investigational assay system, according to an algorithm adapted from the 2018 ASCO/CAP testing guidelines. Eligible patients must have received chemotherapy for metastatic disease or have had disease recurrence during or within 6 months after completing adjuvant chemotherapy. Patients with Hormone Receptor positive (HR-positive) disease must have received at least one line of endocrine therapy. Patients with treated, stable brain metastases were eligible. Patients were ineligible if they had a history of noninfectious interstitial lung disease treated with steroids or had suspected interstitial lung disease on imaging at screening. Both treatment groups were well balanced and approximately 89% in the ENHERTU® group and 90% in the chemotherapy group were HR-positive. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) among patients with HR-positive disease. Secondary end points included PFS among all patients, Overall Survival (OS) in the HR-positive cohort and among all patients, Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, and efficacy in the HR-negative cohort. The median duration of follow up for survival was 18.4 months.

At the time of the primary efficacy analysis, the median PFS in the HR-positive cohort was 10.1 months in the ENHERTU® group and 5.4 months in the physician’s choice group (HR for disease progression or death=0.51; P<0.001). This benefit with ENHERTU® was seen consistently across all analyzed subgroups which included HER2 IHC 1+, HER2 IHC 2+ and ISH-negative, as well as those who had received previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors. The median PFS among all patients was 9.9 months in the ENHERTU® group and 5.1 months in the physician’s choice group (HR for disease progression or death=0.50; P<0.001). The median PFS in the HR-negative cohort was 8.5 months in the ENHERTU® group and 2.9 months in the physician’s choice group (HR=0.46).

The median OS in the HR-positive cohort was 23.9 months in the ENHERTU® group and 17.5 months in the physician’s choice group (HR for death=0.64; P=0.003). The median OS among all patients was 23.4 months in the ENHERTU® group and 16.8 months in the physician’s choice group HR=0.64; P=0.001). The median OS in the HR-negative cohort was 18.2 months in the ENHERTU® group and 8.3 months in the physician’s choice group (HR=0.48).

The ORR in the HR-positive group was 52.6% in the ENHERTU® group and 16.3% in the physician’s choice group, and the median duration of response was 10.7 months in the ENHERTU® group and 6.8 months in the physician’s choice group. The ORR among all patients was 52.3% in the ENHERTU® group and 16.3% in the physician’s choice group. Among HR-negative cohort, the ORRs were 50% and 16.7% respectively.

Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred in 53% of the patients who received ENHERTU® and 67.4% of those who received the physician’s choice of chemotherapy. Adjudicated, drug-related Interstitial Lung Disease or pneumonitis occurred in 12.1% of the patients who received ENHERTU®.

The authors concluded that this is the first Phase III, practice-changing trial of a HER2-directed therapy in patients with HER2-low metastatic breast cancer, to show a statistically significant and clinically meaningful benefit in PFS and OS, compared to standard chemotherapy, regardless of Hormone Receptor status, with a generally manageable safety profile. The authors added that the strong efficacy of ENHERTU® in this HER2-low patient population, with approximately 50% lower risk of disease progression and 36% lower risk of death with ENHERTU® compared to standard chemotherapy, supports the need to reclassify HER2-low as a new targetable category of metastatic breast cancer.

Trastuzumab Deruxtecan in Previously Treated HER2-Low Advanced Breast Cancer. Modi S, Jacot W, Yamashita T, et al. for the DESTINY-Breast04 Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2022; 387:9-20.

Screening for Pancreatic Cancer Results in Early Detection and Improved Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society’s estimates that in 2022, about 62,210 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and 49,830 people will die of the disease. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and Western Europe. Unfortunately, unlike other malignancies, very little progress has been made and outcome for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been dismal, with a 5-year survival rate for metastatic pancreatic cancer of approximately 10%. Pancreatic cancer has surpassed breast cancer as the third leading cause of cancer death in the United States and is on track to surpass colorectal cancer, to move to the second leading cause of cancer related deaths in the United States

Detecting cancer at early stages can significantly increase survival rates and outcomes. Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma is one of the deadliest cancers, and is typically detected when the disease is advanced. Even though serum CA19-9 is intended as an aid in the management of patients with confirmed pancreatic cancer for serial monitoring of their response to therapy and disease progression, it is not recommended by the FDA for screening, as it may be elevated in several benign conditions.

NCCN guideline recommends that germline testing should be considered for all patients with pancreatic cancer and is especially recommended for those with a personal history of cancer, family history or clinical suspicion of a family history of pancreatic cancer. Approximately 10% of pancreatic cancer cases have a familial component. When hereditary cancer syndrome is suspected in patients with pancreatic cancer, genetic counseling should be considered.

Screening for pancreatic cancer has been recommended for individuals considered to be at high risk of developing pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (5% or higher estimated lifetime risk). The risk increases with the number of affected first-degree relatives with pancreatic cancer and in those who carry a pathogenic germline variant in a pancreatic cancer susceptibility gene. The goals of screening for pancreatic cancer are to reduce mortality from pancreatic cancer through early detection, at a stage when the disease is most curable (Stage I), or when there is only a noninvasive neoplasm with high-grade dysplasia.

The Cancer of the Pancreas Screening Study (CAPS) is a research program developed at Johns Hopkins in 1998, to evaluate the effectiveness of early detection screening in high risk individuals of pancreatic cancer, and to progress the discovery of new biomarkers to improve early detection. The screening consortium agreed that to be successful, a screening program should detect and treat T1N0M0 margin-negative pancreatic cancer and high-grade dysplastic precursor lesions (pancreatic intraepithelial neoplasia and intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm). CAPS 1–4 studies were single-institution studies, whereas CAPS 5 is a multicenter, prospective cohort study involving eight academic medical centers in the United States that opened to enrollment in 2014. The goal of CAPS 5 was to report pancreas surveillance outcomes of high-risk individuals within the CAPS 5 study, and to update outcomes of patients enrolled in prior CAPS studies, initiated more than 20 years ago. .

CAPS 5 prospectively enrolled 1,461 high-risk individuals for pancreas surveillance. High Risk Individuals included those with hereditary syndromes or germline variant carriers such as BRCA2, ATM, BRCA1, PALB2 or Lynch syndrome associated genes with a family history of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, FAMMM-Familial Atypical Multiple mole Melanoma (CDKN2A) and Peutz-Jeghers syndrome (STK11). Also included in the high risk group were individuals with a family history of at least one first-degree and one second-degree relative with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. High risk individuals should have met age criteria for surveillance. Surveillance protocol included annual surveillance with endoscopic ultrasound and or MRI/MRCP, often alternating between these two methods. Surveillance interval was modified when suspicious lesions were detected.

The Primary outcome of this study was the early detection of Stage I pancreatic duct adenocarcinoma or a noninvasive neoplasm with high grade dysplasia among high risk individuals undergoing surveillance. The study’s secondary outcome was Overall Survival after a diagnosis of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma or high grade dysplasia for high risk individuals enrolled in all CAPS studies (CAPS1-5), estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

Among the 1461 high risk individuals undergoing surveillance in the CAPS 5 study, 77.8% of pancreatic cancers were surgical pathology Stage I at diagnosis, 88.9% had resectable disease and the median survival for these patients was 9.8 years. This is in contrast to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma diagnosed outside surveillance where more than 50% present with metastatic disease, less than 20% have localized resectable disease and less than 5% have surgical Stage I disease.

In the entire CAPS cohort (CAPS 1-5) to date, the 5-year Overall Survival among screen-detected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 73.3%. The patients who progressed to pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma in this study included carriers with germline pathogenic variants and those who met familial-risk criteria only. These results support current CAPS surveillance recommendations and argue against limiting pancreatic surveillance to those high-risk individuals with known pathogenic mutations. The median survival in the entire CAPS cohort for the patients with a screen-detected pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma was 9.8 years, compared with 1.5 years for patients whose pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma were diagnosed outside surveillance (HR=0.13; P=0.003).

The researchers concluded that screening for pancreatic cancer in high risk individuals can result in early detection, at a stage when the disease is most curable (Stage I).

The Multicenter Cancer of Pancreas Screening Study: Impact on Stage and Survival. Dbouk M, Katona BW, Brand RE, et al., J Clin Oncol. 2022 Jun 15;JCO2200298. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.00298. Online ahead of print.

Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2022: KISQALI® with Switch Endocrine Therapy Following Progression on a Prior CDK4/6 Inhibitor in HR+/HER2-negative Metastatic Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 290,560 new cases of breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2022 and about 43,780 individuals will die of the disease, largely due to metastatic recurrence. Approximately 70% of breast tumors in patients with metastatic disease are Estrogen Receptor (ER) and/or Progesterone Receptor (PR) positive and HER2-negative. These patients are often treated with single agent endocrine therapy, endocrine therapy in combination with CDK4/6 inhibitor, or single agent chemotherapy.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. Cyclin Dependent Kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4 and CDK6) phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity and phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation and associated with increased expression of CDK4. The understanding of the role of Cyclin Dependent Kinases in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.

KISQALI® (Ribociclib) is an orally bioavailable, selective, small-molecule inhibitor of CDK4/6, preferentially inhibiting CDK4 that blocks the phosphorylation of RetinoBlastoma protein, thereby preventing cell-cycle progression and inducing G1 phase arrest.

MAINTAIN trial is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, Phase II, double-blind, placebo-controlled, prospective randomized study, conducted to evaluate the efficacy of Fulvestrant or Exemestane with or without KISQALI®, in patients with HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer, who had previously progressed on any CDK 4/6 inhibitor plus any endocrine therapy. In this study, 119 evaluable patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either KISQALI® 600mg orally once daily given 3 weeks on and 1 week off plus switch endocrine therapy (N= 60) or placebo plus switch endocrine therapy (N=59). Patients treated with prior Fulvestrant received Exemestane as endocrine therapy in the randomization, whereas if prior Exemestane was endocrine therapy, patients received Fulvestrant. If patients received neither as prior endocrine therapy, Fulvestrant or Exemestane was given per investigator discretion, although Fulvestrant was encouraged. Ultimately, 83% of patients received Fulvestrant and 17% received Exemestane. Eligible patients were postmenopausal, had HR+/HER2- negative metastatic breast cancer and had progressed on prior endocrine therapy and any CDK4/6 inhibitor. With regards to prior CDK 4/6 inhibitor treatment, 84% received IBRANCE® (Palbociclib), 11% received KISQALI®, 2% received VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) and 3% received IBRANCE® and another CDK 4/6 inhibitor. The median duration of treatment with the prior CDK4/6 inhibitor was 15.5 months in the KISQALI® group and 17 months in the placebo group. Approximately 60% of patients had visceral metastasis, 45% had de novo metastasis at diagnosis, 18% had bone-only disease, 18% had received 2 or more prior endocrine therapies for metastatic disease, and 9% had received chemotherapy. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Secondary end points included Overall Response Rate (ORR), Clinical Benefit Rate, safety, and tumor and blood biomarkers. The median follow up was 18.2 months.

There was a statistically significant PFS improvement for patients randomized to KISQALI® plus endocrine therapy and the median PFS for patients in the KISQALI® plus endocrine therapy was 5.33 months, compared with 2.76 months for patients receiving placebo and endocrine therapy (HR=0.56;; P=0.004). At 12 months, the PFS rates were 24.6% in the KISQALI® group versus 7.4% in the placebo group. Similar results were noted in the subset of patients treated with Fulvestrant and KISQALI®, and the median PFS for those randomized to KISQALI® was 5.29 months versus 2.76 months in the placebo group (HR=0.59; P=0.02). The PFS benefit was more evident in KISQALI® group compared to the placebo group, especially among those who received a shorter duration of therapy with a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor (HR=0.36) and among those over age 65 years (HR=0.31). The Overall Response Rate in the KISQALI® group was 20%, compared to 11% in the placebo group, and the median Duration of Response was 18.8 months in those treated with KISQALI® and endocrine therapy, compared with 14.8 months for those treated with placebo plus endocrine therapy. There was also a significant improvement in the Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR), defined as patients who achieved Complete Response, Partial Response, or stable disease lasting at least 24 weeks. The CBR was significantly improved in the KISQALI® group, compared with the placebo group, and was 43% versus 25%, respectively (P=0.06). The most common adverse event in the KISQALI® group was neutropenia at 72%, compared to 15% in the placebo group.

It was concluded from this randomized, placebo-controlled trial that, treatment with KISQALI® and an alternate endocrine therapy, after progression on a prior CDK4/6 inhibitor, showed a 43% reduction in the risk of progression or death, compared with placebo and endocrine therapy, in patients with HR+/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer.

A randomized, phase II trial of fulvestrant or exemestane with or without ribociclib after progression on anti-estrogen therapy plus cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibition (CDK 4/6i) in patients (pts) with unresectable or hormone receptor–positive (HR+), HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer (MBC): MAINTAIN trial. Kalinsky K, Accordino MK, Chiuzan C, et al. J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 17; abstr LBA1004). DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2022.40.17_suppl.LBA1004.