The FDA on October 3, 2024, approved OPDIVO® with Platinum-doublet chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by single-agent OPDIVO® after surgery as adjuvant treatment, for adults with resectable (tumors ≥ 4 cm and/or node positive) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and no known Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations or Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) rearrangements. OPDIVO® is a product of Bristol Myers Squibb Company.
Tag: Lung Cancer: Non-Small Cell
TAGRISSO® (Osimertinib)
The FDA on September 25, 2024, approved TAGRISSO® for adult patients with locally advanced, unresectable (Stage III) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) whose disease has not progressed during or following concurrent or sequential Platinum-based chemoradiation therapy and whose tumors have EGFR exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test. TAGRISSO® is a product of AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals.
RYBREVANT® (amivantamab-vmjw)
The FDA on September 19, 2024, approved RYBREVANT® with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations whose disease has progressed on or after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. RYBREVANT® is a product of Janssen Biotech, Inc.
LAZCLUZE® (Lazertinib) plus RYBREVANT® (amivantamab-vmjw)
The FDA on August 19, 2024, approved LAZCLUZE® in combination with RYBREVANT® for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations, as detected by an FDA-approved test. Both LAZCLUZE® and RYBREVANT® are products of Janssen Biotech, Inc.
IMFINZI® (Durvalumab)
The FDA on August 15, 2024, approved IMFINZI® with Platinum-containing chemotherapy as neoadjuvant treatment, followed by single-agent IMFINZI® as adjuvant treatment after surgery for adults with resectable (tumors ≥ 4 cm and/or node positive) Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) and no known Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutations or Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) rearrangements. IMFINZI® is a product of AstraZeneca.
ALECENSA® (Alectinib)
The FDA on April 18, 2024, approved ALECENSA® for adjuvant treatment following tumor resection in patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK)-positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), as detected by an FDA-approved test. ALECENSA® is a product of Genentech, Inc.
FDA Approves RYBREVANT® plus Chemotherapy for EGFR-Mutated NSCLC
SUMMARY: The FDA on September 19, 2024 approved Amivantamab-vmjw (RYBREVANT®) with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 L858R substitution mutations, whose disease has progressed on or after treatment with an EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers.
Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR mutations and 90% of these mutations are either exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in exon 21. Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) plays an important role in regulating cell proliferation, survival and differentiation, and is overexpressed in a variety of epithelial malignancies. EGFR targeted Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as Gefitinib, Erlotinib, Afatinib, Dacomitinib and Osimertinib target the EGFR signaling cascade. However, patients eventually will develop drug resistance due to new EGFR mutations. Another important cause of drug resistance to TKIs is due to the activation of parallel RTK (Receptor Tyrosine Kinase) pathways such as Hepatocyte Growth Factor/Mesenchymal-Epithelial Transition factor (HGF/MET) pathway, thereby bypassing EGFR TKI inhibitors. These patients are often treated with platinum-based chemotherapy as the next line of therapy, resulting in a median Progression Free Survival of 5 months.
Amivantamab (RYBREVANT®) is a fully-human bispecific antibody directed against EGFR and MET receptors. Amivantamab binds extracellularly and simultaneously blocks ligand-induced phosphorylation of EGFR and c-MET, inhibiting tumor growth and promoting tumor cell death. Further, Amivantamab downregulates receptor expression on tumor cells thus preventing drug resistance mediated by new emerging mutations of EGFR or c-MET. By binding to the extracellular domain of the receptor protein, Amivantamab can bypass primary and secondary TKI resistance at the active site. Amivantamab also engages effector cells such as Natural Killer cells, monocytes, and macrophages via its optimized Fc domain. Amivantamab demonstrated activity against a wide range of activating and resistance mutations in EGFR-mutated NSCLC, and in patients with MET exon 14 skip mutations, and is approved for the treatment of patients with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations, whose disease progressed on or after platinum-based chemotherapy.
The efficacy of Amivantamab was assessed in the Phase 3 MARIPOSA-2 trial, a multicenter, open-label study involving 657 patients. These participants, all with EGFR-mutant NSCLC, who had progressed on Osimertinib treatment, were randomly assigned in a 1:2:2 ratio to receive either Amivantamab with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed (referred to as Amivantamab plus chemotherapy-N=131), Carboplatin and Pemetrexed alone (chemotherapy alone-N=263), or Amivantamab combined with other regimens (N=263). Eligible patients had documented presence of EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation and experienced disease progression after receiving Osimertinib as their most recent line of therapy. Patients received Amivantamab 1400 mg IV (1750 mg for body weight 80 kg or greater) weekly for the first 4 weeks, then 1750 mg (2100 mg for body weight 80 kg or greater) every 3 weeks starting at cycle 3 (week 7). The first Amivantamab infusion was split over 2 days, with 350 mg IV on cycle 1, day 1 and the remainder on cycle 1, day 2. Chemotherapy consisted of Carboplatin AUC 5 IV, starting on day 1 every 3 weeks for the first 4 cycles along with Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV every 3 weeks until disease progression. The median age was 62 years, 48% of patients were Asian and approximately 70% of patients had Osimertinib as first line treatment and 30% had Osimertinib as second line treatment. Randomization was stratified by Osimertinib line of therapy (first or second), and race (Asian or non-Asian). All three treatment groups were well balanced. The Primary endpoint of the study was Progression-Free Survival (PFS), assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR). Key Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR), Time to Treatment Discontinuation (TTD), Time to Subsequent Therapy (TTST), Progression-Free Survival after first subsequent therapy (PFS2) and Time to Symptomatic Progression (TTSP).
At a median follow-up of 8.7 months, the PFS was significantly longer for Amivantamab plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone. The median PFS was 6.3 months in the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group and 4.2 months in the chemotherapy alone group (HR for disease progression or death=0.48; P<0.0001), indicating a a 52% reduction in the risk of progression or death. The ORR was significantly higher in the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group at 53%, compared to 29% in the chemotherapy alone group (P<0.0001).
In the prespecified second interim analysis, a numerical improvement in OS was noted for the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group with a median OS of 17.7 months compared to 15.3 months for the chemotherapy alone group (HR=0.73; P=0.039). However, this did not meet the prespecified significance level.
With regards to Post-Progression Endpoints, the median TTD was significantly longer in the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group versus chemotherapy alone group (10.4 months versus 4.5 months; HR=0.42; P<0.0001). The Median TTST was also prolonged in the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group versus chemotherapy alone group (12.2 months compared to 6.6 months HR=0.51; P< 0.0001). The median PFS2 was significantly longer in the Amivantamab plus chemotherapy group compared to the chemotherapy alone group (16.0 months versus 11.6 months (HR= 0.64; P=0.002). Common adverse reactions observed in patients receiving Amivantamab plus chemotherapy included rash, infusion-related reactions, fatigue, nail toxicity, nausea, constipation, edema, stomatitis, decreased appetite, musculoskeletal pain, vomiting, and COVID-19 infection.
In conclusion, the results from the MARIPOSA-2 trial provide compelling evidence for the use of Amivantamab in combination with Carboplatin and Pemetrexed in the treatment of advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC post-Osimertinib progression. While the PFS outcomes were significantly improved, the OS benefits, promising as they may be, require further follow-up for conclusive results. The final Overall Survival analysis will be eagerly awaited, as it will further illuminate the long-term efficacy of this treatment approach.
Amivantamab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy in EGFR-mutated, advanced non-small cell lung cancer after disease progression on osimertinib: Second interim overall survival from MARIPOSA-2. Popat S, Reckamp KL, Califano R, et al. Presented at: 2024 ESMO Congress; September 13-17, 2024; Barcelona, Spain. LBA54.
Ivonescimab may be Superior to Pembrolizumab as First-Line Treatment in NSCLC
SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers.
Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options, by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival, across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. Biomarkers predicting responses to ICIs include Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Mismatch Repair (MMR) status, and Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression.
Pembrolizumab (KEYTRUDA®) is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1, monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby unleashing the T cells. Five year results from the Phase III KEYNOTE-042 study which included eligible patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC without EGFR/ALK alterations and with PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) 1% or more favored Pembrolizumab over chemotherapy, regardless of PD-L1 TPS.
Ivonescimab (AK112) is a novel bispecific antibody designed to target both PD-1 and Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF). Its dual targeting mechanism is intended to enhance the therapeutic efficacy against advanced NSCLC, and has shown promising results in early-phase trials. Dual inhibition of PD-1 and VEGF by Ivonescimab might provide synergistic effects, enhancing therapeutic efficacy beyond what is achieved with PD-L1 inhibition alone.
The HARMONi-2 (AK112-303) is a randomized Phase III study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Ivonescimab compared to Pembrolizumab, a well-established PD-1 inhibitor, in patients with advanced NSCLC. In this study, 398 eligible patients (N=398) from 55 centers in China with untreated locally advanced (Stage IIIB or IIIC) or metastatic (Stage IV) NSCLC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Ivonescimab 20 mg/kg administered IV every 3 weeks or Pembrolizumab 200 mg administered IV every 3 weeks. Patients were required to have PD-L1 positive tumors (TPS 1% or more), and patients with known EGFR mutations, ALK rearrangements, or prior systemic therapy were excluded. Randomization was stratified by histology (squamous versus non-squamous), clinical stage (IIIB/IIIC versus IV), and PD-L1 expression levels (TPS 1-49% versus TPS 50% or more).
The Primary endpoint was Progression-Free Survival (PFS), assessed by an Independent Radiographic Review Committee (IRRC). Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Investigator-assessed PFS, Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DoR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), and Safety.
The interim analysis of this study was conducted after a median follow-up of 8.7 months, from November 2022 to August 2023. The median PFS was significantly longer with Ivonescimab compared to Pembrolizumab. Patients receiving Ivonescimab had a median PFS of 11.14 months versus 5.82 months with Pembrolizumab. The Hazard Ratio (HR) was 0.51 (P<0.0001), indicating a 49% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The PFS benefit of Ivonescimab was consistent across various subgroups including histology, PD-L1 expression and metastatic sites. Ivonescimab demonstrated superior outcomes in ORR and DCR compared to Pembrolizumab with an ORR for Ivonescimab of 50%, compared to 38.5% for Pembrolizumab. The DCR was 89.9% with Ivonescimab and 70.5% with Pembrolizumab.
Both treatments showed similar safety profiles with no new safety signals for Ivonescimab. Treatment-Related Serious Adverse Events (TRSAEs) occurred in 20.8% of Ivonescimab-treated patients and 16.1% of Pembrolizumab-treated patients. Grade 3 or more immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) were comparable: 7.1% with Ivonescimab and 8.0% with Pembrolizumab. Specifically, in patients with squamous cell carcinoma, TRSAEs were 18.9% with Ivonescimab and 18.7% with Pembrolizumab. Ivonescimab was associated with slightly higher rates of proteinuria and hypertension but overall demonstrated a manageable safety profile. Overall survival data and long-term safety data are awaited to confirm the clinical benefits of Ivonescimab.
In conclusion, the HARMONi-2 trial provided compelling evidence that Ivonescimab offers a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in PFS compared to Pembrolizumab, in PD-L1 positive advanced NSCLC patients, with manageable safety profile. If subsequent data continue to support these findings, Ivonescimab may be a valuable alternative to existing therapies. One limitation is that the trial was conducted exclusively in China, which might affect the generalizability of the results to other populations.
Phase 3 study of ivonescimab (AK112) vs pembrolizumab as first-line treatment for PD-L1–positive advanced NSCLC: Primary analysis of HARMONi-2. Zhou C, Chen J, Wu L, et al. 2024 World Conference on Lung Cancer. Abstract PL02.04. Presented September 8, 2024. San Diego, CA.
TAGRISSO® after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR Mutated Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 13% of all new cancers and 21% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024, about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Approximately one third of all patients with NSCLC have Stage III, locally advanced disease at the time of initial presentation and 60 to 90% of these patients have unresectable disease. These patients are treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT) followed by consolidation therapy with Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) in patients without progression, as this regimen confers an Overall Survival advantage, and is considered the standard of care (PACIFIC trial).
EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations are found in up to one third of patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC. There are currently no approved targeted treatments for patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC. The current standard of care, which includes consolidation therapy with Durvalumab, may not offer clear benefits to this subset of patients with EGFR mutations.
Osimertinib (TAGRISSO®) is a highly selective third-generation, irreversible Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), presently approved by the FDA, for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R mutations, as well as treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR-TKI therapy. Osimertinib is also approved by the FDA as adjuvant treatment for resected Stage IB–IIIA EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Further, Osimertinib has higher CNS penetration and is therefore able to induce responses in 70-90% of patients with brain metastases.
LAURA was a global, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter Phase III trial conducted to assess the efficacy and safety of Osimertinib in patients with unresectable Stage III NSCLC harboring EGFR mutations (EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R mutation). The trial enrolled patients who had not experienced disease progression during or after definitive platinum-based chemoradiotherapy (CRT). A total of 216 patients who had undergone CRT were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive Osimertinib 80 mg orally once daily (N=143) or placebo once per day (N=73). Treatment was continued until Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR)–assessed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other discontinuation criteria were met. Upon disease progression, patients in the placebo arm were permitted to receive Osimertinib, allowing for crossover therapy. Stratification factors included method of CRT (concurrent versus sequential) and disease Stage (IIIA versus IIIB/C). Both treatment groups were well balanced. The median patient age was 63 years, approximately 60% of participants were female, 83% were Asian, 69% had never smoked and 85% had Stage IIIA and B disease. Majority of patients received concurrent CRT rather than sequential CRT. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS) as assessed by BICR. Key Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), survival without progression of CNS disease (CNS Progression Free Survival), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response, Quality of Life, and Safety.
Treatment with Osimertinib resulted in significant PFS improvement compared to placebo. The median PFS was 39.1 months in the Osimertinib group versus 5.6 months in the placebo group, representing an 84% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR=0.16; P<0.001). Additionally, a higher percentage of patients in the Osimertinib group remained alive and progression-free at 12 months compared to the placebo group (74% versus 22% respectively). Subgroup analyses were conducted to evaluate the consistency of treatment effects across various demographic and clinical factors. The benefits of Osimertinib were observed across all prespecified subgroups, indicating a consistent treatment effect, regardless of patient characteristics. The incidence of new lesions was lower with Osimertinib compared to placebo (22% versus 68%), and this included new brain lesions (8% versus 29%) and new lung lesions (6% versus 29%) respectively. The Objective Response Rate was higher with Osimertinib than with placebo (57% versus 33%). The median Duration of Response was longer with Osimertinib (36.9 months) than with placebo (6.5 months). Interim OS data showed a favorable trend for Osimertinib, although maturity was limited at the time of analysis. Further follow-up will be conducted to assess OS as a secondary endpoint. The adverse event profile of Osimertinib was generally consistent with previous studies. Grade 3 or higher adverse events occurred more frequently in the Osimertinib group, with radiation pneumonitis being the most common. However, no new safety concerns emerged during the trial.
In summary, treatment with Osimertinib resulted in significantly longer Progression Free Survival than placebo in patients with unresectable Stage III EGFR-mutated NSCLC following definitive CRT, and should be considered the new standard of care for this group of patients. Overall, the LAURA study represents a major breakthrough in the treatment of EGFR-mutated Stage III NSCLC, addressing an unmet need for targeted therapies in this setting. Further follow-up will provide additional insights into the long-term efficacy and safety of Osimertinib in this patient population.
Osimertinib after Chemoradiotherapy in Stage III EGFR-Mutated NSCLC. Lu S, Kato T, Dong X, et al. for the LAURA Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med 2024;391:585-597
Lung Cancer Risk with Vaping and Cigarette Smoking
SUMMARY: According to the American Cancer Society, tobacco use is responsible for nearly 1 in 5 deaths in the United States and accounts for at least 30% of all cancer deaths. Smokeless tobacco products are a major source of cancer causing nitrosamines, and increase the risk of developing cancer of the oropharynx, esophagus, and pancreas. Cigarette smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic and some linked to cancer.
The use of e-cigarettes (electronic cigarettes) often referred to as “vaping” was introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 after e-cigarettes were first developed in China. When a smoker inhales through the mouth piece of an e-cigarette, the air flow triggers a sensor that switches on a small lithium battery powered heater, which in turn vaporizes liquid nicotine along with PolyEthylene Glycol (PEG) present in a small cartridge. The PEG vapor looks like smoke. The potent liquid form of nicotine extracted from tobacco is tinctured with fragrant flavors such as chocolate, cherry and bubble gum, coloring substances, as well as other chemicals and these e-liquids are powerful neurotoxins. With the rapid growth of the e-cigarette industry and the evidence of potential dangers and risk to public health, particularly children, experts from the world’s leading lung organizations were compelled to release a POSITION statement on e-cigarettes, specifically focusing on their potential adverse effects on human health, and calling on government organizations to ban or restrict the use of e-cigarettes, until their impact on health is better understood. With epidemiological data demonstrating that nicotine use is a gateway to the use of cocaine and marijuana and subsequent lifelong addiction, the Forum of International Respiratory Societies (FIRS), an organization composed of the world’s leading international respiratory societies including American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) made several important recommendations (not included here).
The health risks associated with vaping might be compounded by the presence of harmful substances in e-cigarette aerosols, such as diacetyl, diethylene glycol, aldehydes, cadmium, benzene, and heavy metals like nickel, tin, and lead. These components are known to be toxic and carcinogenic, raising concerns about their contribution to lung cancer risk.
Recent concerns have emerged about the potential health risks associated with vaping, particularly in relation to lung cancer. Although nicotine exposure from electronic delivery systems (vaping) has been linked to elevated risks of lung conditions, the impact on lung cancer risk has remained relatively unexplored. To address this gap, the researchers in this publication conducted a comprehensive case-control study at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, examining the association between vaping, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk. The researchers in this study analyzed medical records from the James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, encompassing data from 4,975 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed lung cancer between 2013 and 2021. This patient cohort was meticulously matched to 27,294 control individuals without cancer on a 5:1 ratio based on age, gender, race, and year of ascertainment. The researchers utilized descriptive statistics and performed logistic regression analyses to evaluate the associations between vaping, smoking, and lung cancer risk. This analysis aimed to determine how these factors individually and synergistically contributed to the likelihood of developing lung cancer.
The results of this analysis demonstrated that the demographic profile of the lung cancer cases showed a predominance of males (55%), with a majority being White (88%). The mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. There was a significantly higher risk of lung cancer among individuals who both vaped and smoked compared to those who only smoked. Specifically, the adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for those who reported both vaping and smoking was 21.1 (95% CI = 17.1, 26.1), while for smoking alone, it was 6.3 (95% CI = 5.8, 6.8). Further stratification by gender and histologic cell type demonstrated that the risk associated with combined vaping and smoking was consistently over 3X higher compared to smoking alone (P<0.001). This elevated risk persisted even after adjusting for comorbidities, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease.
The researchers added that these findings underscore a markedly higher risk of lung cancer associated with the combination of vaping and smoking compared to smoking alone. This synergistic effect is reminiscent of the risks associated with known carcinogens such as radon or asbestos. The results suggest that the addition of vaping to smoking significantly accelerates the risk of developing lung cancer.
The limitations of this study are that this analysis did not include a vaping-only group, as nearly 97% of those who vaped also reported smoking. Additionally, there was no detailed temporal data on the duration and frequency of vaping versus smoking. However, the consistent significant increase in lung cancer risk observed with combined vaping and smoking indicates a potentially substantial interaction effect.
In conclusion, this case-control study provides compelling evidence suggesting that vaping combined with smoking may significantly elevate lung cancer risk. While these preliminary findings highlight the potential dangers of e-cigarettes, further research is necessary to confirm these results and explore the long-term implications of vaping on lung cancer risk. Physicians should reconsider harm-reduction messages related to vaping, as it may NOT be safer than smoking. Further studies are needed to quantify the exact risks associated with vaping and smoking, as well as to understand the long-term effects.
Vaping, smoking and lung cancer: A case-control study. Bittoni MA, Carbone D, Harris R. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract 2213.