The FDA on November 19, 2025, granted traditional approval to IMDELLTRA® for adults with Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. IMDELLTRA® received accelerated approval for this indication in 2024. IMDELLTRA® is a product of Amgen Inc.
Tag: Lung Cancer: Small Cell
ZEPZELCA® (Lurbinectedin)
The FDA on October 2, 2025, approved ZEPZELCA® in combination with Atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ®) or Atezolizumab and Hyaluronidase-tqjs (TECENTRIQ HYBREZA®) for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) whose disease has not progressed after first-line induction therapy with TECENTRIQ® or TECENTRIQ HYBREZA®, Carboplatin, and Etoposide. ZEPZELCA® is a product of Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and TECENTRIQ® as well as TECENTRIQ HYBREZA® are products of Genentech Inc.
FDA Approves ZEPZELCA® Plus TECENTRIQ® for First-Line Maintenance in Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
SUMMARY: The FDA on October 2, 2025, approved Lurbinectedin (ZEPZELCA®) in combination with Atezolizumab (TECENTRIQ®) or Atezolizumab and hyaluronidase-tqjs (TECENTRIQ HYBREZA®), for the maintenance treatment of adult patients with Extensive-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) whose disease has not progressed after first-line induction therapy with Atezolizumab or Atezolizumab and hyaluronidase-tqjs, Carboplatin, and Etoposide.
The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2025, about 226,650 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 124,730 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) originates from neuroendocrine cells and accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers diagnosed annually in the US. It is lethal and aggressive. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis.
Treatment decisions was SCLC are typically based on the VA Lung Group 2-Staging system, which classifies disease as either Limited Stage (LS) or Extensive Stage (ES). In Limited Stage patients, the disease burden is limited to one hemithorax and regional nodes, without presence of extra-thoracic disease, and amenable to definitive-intent thoracic Radiation Therapy (RT). Extensive Stage encompasses all other SCLC patients.
Patients with ES-SCLC are often treated with chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiation in the first line setting. While initial responses to chemotherapy are often dramatic, relapse occurs in most patients, and recurrent disease typically demonstrates resistance to previously effective regimens. Consequently, extending response durability through maintenance therapy remains a key therapeutic goal.
Lurbinectedin is a selective alkylating agent that binds to guanine residues within DNA, leading to inhibition of oncogenic transcription factors and impairment of DNA repair pathways. This disrupts the cell cycle and induces tumor cell death.
Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1), blocking its interaction with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. By inhibiting PD-L1–mediated immune evasion, Atezolizumab restores anti-tumor T-cell activity and enhances immune-mediated tumor elimination.
The IMforte Trial: Study Design
The IMforte Trial is a global, open-label, randomized Phase III study (NCT05091567) conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of Lurbinectedin plus Atezolizumab as first-line maintenance therapy for adults with Extensive-Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC). In this study, a total of 660 treatment-naïve patients received induction therapy with Atezolizumab, Carboplatin, and Etoposide for four 21-day cycles. Of these, 483 patients without disease progression were randomized 1:1 to receive either:
- Lurbinectedin 3.2 mg/m² IV every 3 weeks with G-CSF prophylaxis plus Atezolizumab 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks, or
- Atezolizumab alone 1200 mg IV every 3 weeks
Treatment was continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Stratification factors included baseline liver metastases, ECOG performance status, LDH levels, and receipt of prophylactic cranial irradiation. The Primary endpoints were Independent Review Facility (IRF)–assessed Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) from the start of maintenance therapy.
Efficacy Outcomes
After a median follow-up of 15 months, the IMforte study achieved both of its Primary endpoints:
- Median PFS: 5.4 months with Lurbinectedin plus Atezolizumab vs 2.1 months with Atezolizumab alone (HR=0.54; 95% CI: 0.43–0.67; P<0.0001)
- Median OS: 13.2 months vs 10.6 months, respectively (HR=0.73; 95% CI: 0.57–0.95; P=0.0174)
These outcomes reflect a 46% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death and a 27% reduction in the risk of death with the combination regimen. Median maintenance treatment duration was 4.1 months for the combination arm and 2.1 months for the monotherapy arm.
Safety and Tolerability
The combination of Lurbinectedin and Atezolizumab demonstrated a manageable safety profile with no new safety signals.
- Any-grade treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs):5% (combo) vs 40.0% (monotherapy)
- Grade 3–4 TRAEs: 25.6% vs 5.8%
- Grade 5 TRAEs: 0.8% vs 0.4%
The most common adverse reactions (≥30%) were lymphopenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea, and fatigue/asthenia. Discontinuations due to adverse events occurred in 6.2% and 3.3% of patients, respectively.
Clinical Interpretation
IMforte is the first global Phase III study to demonstrate significant improvement in both PFS and OS with a first-line maintenance approach in ES-SCLC. By integrating the DNA-damaging activity of Lurbinectedin with the immune reactivation potential of PD-L1 blockade, the combination offers a dual mechanism to counter both tumor proliferation and immune evasion. These results establish Lurbinectedin plus Atezolizumab as a new standard maintenance option for patients whose disease remains controlled after induction chemoimmunotherapy, an important milestone in a disease where long-term survival has historically been rare.
Key Takeaways for Oncology Practice
- Unmet Need: SCLC remains an aggressive malignancy with limited long-term treatment options.
- Clinical Significance: IMforte is the first Phase III trial to demonstrate both OS and PFS gains with a first-line maintenance regimen in ES-SCLC.
- Mechanistic Synergy: Combines DNA-targeted cytotoxic activity (Lurbinectedin) with PD-L1 blockade (Atezolizumab) for enhanced and durable tumor control.
- Practice Impact: Establishes Lurbinectedin plus Atezolizumab as an FDA-approved maintenance option for patients with ES-SCLC who respond to induction chemoimmunotherapy.
- Safety: Manageable toxicity profile; regular hematologic and clinical monitoring recommended.
Efficacy and safety of first-line maintenance therapy with lurbinectedin plus atezolizumab in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (IMforte): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 trial. Paz-Ares L, Borghaei H, Liu SV, et al. The Lancet 2025;405:2129-2143.
Tarlatamab Sets New Standard in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from DeLLphi-304
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2025, about 226,650 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 124,730 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) originates from neuroendocrine cells and accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers diagnosed annually in the US. It is lethal and aggressive. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis.
Treatment decisions was SCLC are typically based on the VA Lung Group 2-Staging system, which classifies disease as either Limited Stage (LS) or Extensive Stage (ES). In Limited Stage patients, the disease burden is limited to one hemithorax and regional nodes, without presence of extra-thoracic disease, and amenable to definitive-intent thoracic Radiation Therapy (RT). Extensive Stage encompasses all other SCLC patients.
Patients with ES-SCLC are often treated with chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiation in the first line setting. Nearly all patients with SCLC experience disease recurrence during or after standard platinum-based chemotherapy, underscoring the need for novel treatment strategies Second-line treatment options are limited, and the response duration is short varying from 3-5 months, with Overall Survival rarely exceeding 8 months. There are presently no approved therapies for third line and beyond and these patients face a dire prognosis.
Delta-Like Protein 3 also known as DLL3, is encoded by the DLL3 gene and is expressed on the surface of tumor cells but not in normal adult tissues. Patients with high-grade pulmonary NeuroEndocrine Tumors, Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and Large Cell NeuroEndocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) have increased expression of DLL3 protein (increased expression seen in approximately 85-96% of the SCLC tumors), making this a a potential target in the treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tarlatamab (IMDELLTRA®) is a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy that directs the patients T cells to cancer cells expressing Delta-Like Ligand 3 (DLL3), independent of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I. Tarlatamab binds to both DLL3 on cancer cells and CD3 on T cells, leading to T-cell–mediated lysis of cancer cells.
In May 2024, the U.S. FDA granted accelerated approval to Tarlatamab for adult patients with extensive-stage SCLC whose disease progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. This decision was based largely on early clinical benefit observed in the Phase 2 DeLLphi-301 trial, where Tarlatamab demonstrated a 40% Overall Response Rate (ORR) in previously treated patients. Now, confirmatory results from the Phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial further support the role of Tarlatamab in the treatment landscape, and mark a potential new standard of care for recurrent SCLC.
Phase 3 DeLLphi-304: Study Design and Population
DeLLphi-304 was a global, randomized, open-label trial comparing Tarlatamab, with standard-of-care chemotherapy which included Topotecan, Lurbinectedin, or Amrubicin, in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, whose disease progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 509 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Tarlatamab (N=254) or chemotherapy (N=255). The median patient age was 65 yrs, Approximately 45% of randomized patients had current or previous brain metastases, 35% had liver metastases, 71% had received previous therapy with checkpoint inhibitors and 44% had platinum-resistant disease. Stratification factors included prior PD-L1 inhibitor treatment, chemotherapy-free interval, presence of brain metastases, and intended chemotherapy regimen. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and Safety.
Tarlatamab Demonstrates Significant Survival Benefit
At a median follow-up of approximately 11 months, Tarlatamab demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in OS:
- Median OS: 13.6 vs 8.3 months (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47–0.77; P<0.001)
- Median PFS: 4.2 vs 3.2 months (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59–0.88; P<0.001)
This translated to a 40% reduction in the risk of death for patients receiving Tarlatamab. The survival benefit extended across all prespecified subgroups, including age, gender, race, and prior anti–PD-L1 therapy. The ORR was 35% in the Tarlatamab group and 20% in the chemotherapy group.
Improved Symptom Control and Quality of Life
Beyond survival, Tarlatamab provided clinically meaningful improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes, including relief from hallmark symptoms of SCLC:
- Dyspnea score improved at 18 weeks: –1.94 with Tarlatamab vs +7.20 with CTx (mean difference –9.14; P< 0.001)
- Cough improvement: 16% vs 9% (Odds Ratio 2.04; P = 0.012)
- Chest pain improvement: 9% vs 4% (Odds Ratio 1.84; P = 0.100) – not significant
These findings reflect an overall better patient experience and potential Quality-of-Life benefit with Tarlatamab therapy.
Safety Profile and Tolerability
Tarlatamab was associated with a more favorable safety profile compared to chemotherapy:
- Grade 3 or more Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs): 27% (Tarlatamab) vs 62% (Chemotherapy)
- Discontinuations due to TRAEs: 3% vs 6%
- Most common Grade 3 or more TRAEs with Tarlatamab were neutropenia (4%) and lymphopenia (4%)
- Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) occurred in 56% of patients (mostly grade 1-2) and was manageable in clinical settings
These safety results support Tarlatamab as a more tolerable alternative to conventional chemotherapy.
Looking Ahead: Optimizing Treatment Sequencing
While the DeLLphi-304 trial has established Tarlatamab as an effective option post-platinum therapy, questions remain regarding its integration into the broader SCLC treatment paradigm. PD-L1 inhibitors already form part of standard first-line and maintenance therapy. Early-phase studies have shown that Tarlatamab can be safely combined with anti–PD-L1 agents, and this is being further evaluated in the ongoing DeLLphi-305 trial, a Phase 3 study assessing Tarlatamab plus PD-L1 inhibition as first-line maintenance following chemotherapy. Additionally, biomarker-driven analyses from DeLLphi-304 are underway to help identify patients most likely to benefit from Tarlatamab and those who may achieve durable responses.
Conclusion
The DeLLphi-304 trial positions Tarlatamab as a practice-changing therapy for patients with SCLC that has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. With significant improvements in Overall and Progression-Free Survival, better symptom control, and a favorable safety profile, Tarlatamab redefines second-line treatment for a historically underserved patient population. These results not only represent a meaningful advance in SCLC therapy but also signal a broader shift toward targeted immunotherapy strategies in aggressive thoracic malignancies.
Tarlatamab in Small-Cell Lung Cancer after Platinum-Based Chemotherapy. Mountzios G, Sun L, Cho BC, et al. for the DeLLphi-304 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2025;393:349-361
Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2025: Tarlatamab Sets New Standard in Recurrent Small Cell Lung Cancer: Results from DeLLphi-304
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2025, about 226,650 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 124,730 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) originates from neuroendocrine cells and accounts for approximately 10-15% of all lung cancers diagnosed annually in the US. It is lethal and aggressive. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis.
Treatment decisions was SCLC are typically based on the VA Lung Group 2-Staging system, which classifies disease as either Limited Stage (LS) or Extensive Stage (ES). In Limited Stage patients, the disease burden is limited to one hemithorax and regional nodes, without presence of extra-thoracic disease, and amenable to definitive-intent thoracic Radiation Therapy (RT). Extensive Stage encompasses all other SCLC patients.
Patients with ES-SCLC are often treated with chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiation in the first line setting. Nearly all patients with SCLC experience disease recurrence during or after standard platinum-based chemotherapy, underscoring the need for novel treatment strategies Second-line treatment options are limited, and the response duration is short varying from 3-5 months, with Overall Survival rarely exceeding 8 months. There are presently no approved therapies for third line and beyond and these patients face a dire prognosis.
Delta-Like Protein 3 also known as DLL3, is encoded by the DLL3 gene and is expressed on the surface of tumor cells but not in normal adult tissues. Patients with high-grade pulmonary NeuroEndocrine Tumors, Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and Large Cell NeuroEndocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) have increased expression of DLL3 protein (increased expression seen in approximately 85-96% of the SCLC tumors), making this a a potential target in the treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tarlatamab (IMDELLTRA®) is a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy that directs the patients T cells to cancer cells expressing Delta-Like Ligand 3 (DLL3), independent of Major Histocompatibility Complex (MHC) class I. Tarlatamab binds to both DLL3 on cancer cells and CD3 on T cells, leading to T-cell–mediated lysis of cancer cells.
In May 2024, the U.S. FDA granted accelerated approval to Tarlatamab for adult patients with extensive-stage SCLC whose disease progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. This decision was based largely on early clinical benefit observed in the Phase 2 DeLLphi-301 trial, where Tarlatamab demonstrated a 40% Overall Response Rate (ORR) in previously treated patients. Now, confirmatory results from the Phase 3 DeLLphi-304 trial further support the role of Tarlatamab in the treatment landscape, and mark a potential new standard of care for recurrent SCLC.
Phase 3 DeLLphi-304: Study Design and Population
DeLLphi-304 was a global, randomized, open-label trial comparing Tarlatamab, with standard-of-care chemotherapy which included Topotecan, Lurbinectedin, or Amrubicin, in patients with extensive-stage SCLC, whose disease progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. A total of 509 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either Tarlatamab (N=254) or chemotherapy (N=255). Stratification factors included prior PD-L1 inhibitor treatment, chemotherapy-free interval, presence of brain metastases, and intended chemotherapy regimen. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Objective Response Rate (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR), Disease Control Rate (DCR), Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs), and Safety.
Tarlatamab Demonstrates Significant Survival Benefit
At a median follow-up of approximately 11 months, Tarlatamab demonstrated a statistically and clinically significant improvement in OS:
- Median OS: 13.6 vs 8.3 months (HR 0.60; 95% CI: 0.47–0.77; P<0.001)
- Median PFS: 4.2 vs 3.2 months (HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.59–0.88; P<0.001)
This translated to a 40% reduction in the risk of death for patients receiving Tarlatamab. The survival benefit extended across all prespecified subgroups, including age, gender, race, and prior anti–PD-L1 therapy. The ORR was 35% in the Tarlatamab group and 20% in the chemotherapy group.
Improved Symptom Control and Quality of Life
Beyond survival, Tarlatamab provided clinically meaningful improvements in Patient-Reported Outcomes, including relief from hallmark symptoms of SCLC:
- Dyspnea score improved at 18 weeks: –1.94 with Tarlatamab vs +7.20 with CTx (mean difference –9.14; P< 0.001)
- Cough improvement: 16% vs 9% (Odds Ratio 2.04; P = 0.012)
- Chest pain improvement: 9% vs 4% (Odds Ratio 1.84; P = 0.100)
These findings reflect an overall better patient experience and potential Quality-of-Life benefit with Tarlatamab therapy.
Safety Profile and Tolerability
Tarlatamab was associated with a more favorable safety profile compared to chemotherapy:
- Grade 3 or more Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs): 27% (Tarlatamab) vs 62% (Chemotherapy)
- Discontinuations due to TRAEs: 3% vs 6%
- Most common Grade 3 or more TRAEs with Tarlatamab were neutropenia (4%) and lymphopenia (4%)
- Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS) occurred in 56% of patients (mostly grade 1-2) and was manageable in clinical settings
These safety results support Tarlatamab as a more tolerable alternative to conventional chemotherapy.
Looking Ahead: Optimizing Treatment Sequencing
While the DeLLphi-304 trial has established Tarlatamab as an effective option post-platinum therapy, questions remain regarding its integration into the broader SCLC treatment paradigm. PD-L1 inhibitors already form part of standard first-line and maintenance therapy. Early-phase studies have shown that Tarlatamab can be safely combined with anti–PD-L1 agents, and this is being further evaluated in the ongoing DeLLphi-305 trial, a Phase 3 study assessing Tarlatamab plus PD-L1 inhibition as first-line maintenance following chemotherapy. Additionally, biomarker-driven analyses from DeLLphi-304 are underway to help identify patients most likely to benefit from Tarlatamab and those who may achieve durable responses.
Conclusion
The DeLLphi-304 trial positions Tarlatamab as a practice-changing therapy for patients with SCLC that has progressed after platinum-based chemotherapy. With significant improvements in Overall and Progression-Free Survival, better symptom control, and a favorable safety profile, Tarlatamab redefines second-line treatment for a historically underserved patient population. These results not only represent a meaningful advance in SCLC therapy but also signal a broader shift toward targeted immunotherapy strategies in aggressive thoracic malignancies.
Tarlatamab versus chemotherapy (CTx) as second-line (2L) treatment for small cell lung cancer (SCLC): Primary analysis of Ph3 DeLLphi-304. Rudin C, Mountzios G, Sun L, et al. J Clin Oncol 43, 2025 (suppl 17; abstr LBA8008)
IMFINZI® (Durvalumab)
The FDA on December 4, 2024, approved IMFINZI® for adults with Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) whose disease has not progressed following concurrent platinum-based chemotherapy and radiation therapy. IMFINZI® is a product of AstraZeneca.
IMDELLTRA® (Tarlatamab-dlle)
The FDA on May 16, 2024, granted accelerated approval to IMDELLTRA® (Tarlatamab-dlle) (Imdelltra, Amgen, Inc.) for Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. IMDELLTRA® is a product of Amgen, Inc.
Lung Cancer Risk with Vaping and Cigarette Smoking
SUMMARY: According to the American Cancer Society, tobacco use is responsible for nearly 1 in 5 deaths in the United States and accounts for at least 30% of all cancer deaths. Smokeless tobacco products are a major source of cancer causing nitrosamines, and increase the risk of developing cancer of the oropharynx, esophagus, and pancreas. Cigarette smoke contains more than 7,000 chemicals, many of which are toxic and some linked to cancer.
The use of e-cigarettes (electronic cigarettes) often referred to as “vaping” was introduced to the U.S. market in 2007 after e-cigarettes were first developed in China. When a smoker inhales through the mouth piece of an e-cigarette, the air flow triggers a sensor that switches on a small lithium battery powered heater, which in turn vaporizes liquid nicotine along with PolyEthylene Glycol (PEG) present in a small cartridge. The PEG vapor looks like smoke. The potent liquid form of nicotine extracted from tobacco is tinctured with fragrant flavors such as chocolate, cherry and bubble gum, coloring substances, as well as other chemicals and these e-liquids are powerful neurotoxins. With the rapid growth of the e-cigarette industry and the evidence of potential dangers and risk to public health, particularly children, experts from the world’s leading lung organizations were compelled to release a POSITION statement on e-cigarettes, specifically focusing on their potential adverse effects on human health, and calling on government organizations to ban or restrict the use of e-cigarettes, until their impact on health is better understood. With epidemiological data demonstrating that nicotine use is a gateway to the use of cocaine and marijuana and subsequent lifelong addiction, the Forum of International Respiratory Societies (FIRS), an organization composed of the world’s leading international respiratory societies including American Thoracic Society (ATS) and the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) made several important recommendations (not included here).
The health risks associated with vaping might be compounded by the presence of harmful substances in e-cigarette aerosols, such as diacetyl, diethylene glycol, aldehydes, cadmium, benzene, and heavy metals like nickel, tin, and lead. These components are known to be toxic and carcinogenic, raising concerns about their contribution to lung cancer risk.
Recent concerns have emerged about the potential health risks associated with vaping, particularly in relation to lung cancer. Although nicotine exposure from electronic delivery systems (vaping) has been linked to elevated risks of lung conditions, the impact on lung cancer risk has remained relatively unexplored. To address this gap, the researchers in this publication conducted a comprehensive case-control study at The Ohio State University in Columbus, Ohio, examining the association between vaping, cigarette smoking, and lung cancer risk. The researchers in this study analyzed medical records from the James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, encompassing data from 4,975 patients diagnosed with pathologically confirmed lung cancer between 2013 and 2021. This patient cohort was meticulously matched to 27,294 control individuals without cancer on a 5:1 ratio based on age, gender, race, and year of ascertainment. The researchers utilized descriptive statistics and performed logistic regression analyses to evaluate the associations between vaping, smoking, and lung cancer risk. This analysis aimed to determine how these factors individually and synergistically contributed to the likelihood of developing lung cancer.
The results of this analysis demonstrated that the demographic profile of the lung cancer cases showed a predominance of males (55%), with a majority being White (88%). The mean age at diagnosis was 62 years. There was a significantly higher risk of lung cancer among individuals who both vaped and smoked compared to those who only smoked. Specifically, the adjusted Odds Ratio (OR) for those who reported both vaping and smoking was 21.1 (95% CI = 17.1, 26.1), while for smoking alone, it was 6.3 (95% CI = 5.8, 6.8). Further stratification by gender and histologic cell type demonstrated that the risk associated with combined vaping and smoking was consistently over 3X higher compared to smoking alone (P<0.001). This elevated risk persisted even after adjusting for comorbidities, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and cardiovascular disease.
The researchers added that these findings underscore a markedly higher risk of lung cancer associated with the combination of vaping and smoking compared to smoking alone. This synergistic effect is reminiscent of the risks associated with known carcinogens such as radon or asbestos. The results suggest that the addition of vaping to smoking significantly accelerates the risk of developing lung cancer.
The limitations of this study are that this analysis did not include a vaping-only group, as nearly 97% of those who vaped also reported smoking. Additionally, there was no detailed temporal data on the duration and frequency of vaping versus smoking. However, the consistent significant increase in lung cancer risk observed with combined vaping and smoking indicates a potentially substantial interaction effect.
In conclusion, this case-control study provides compelling evidence suggesting that vaping combined with smoking may significantly elevate lung cancer risk. While these preliminary findings highlight the potential dangers of e-cigarettes, further research is necessary to confirm these results and explore the long-term implications of vaping on lung cancer risk. Physicians should reconsider harm-reduction messages related to vaping, as it may NOT be safer than smoking. Further studies are needed to quantify the exact risks associated with vaping and smoking, as well as to understand the long-term effects.
Vaping, smoking and lung cancer: A case-control study. Bittoni MA, Carbone D, Harris R. Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract 2213.
Late Breaking Abstract – ASCO 2024: IMFINZI® as Consolidation Treatment for Limited Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer
SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2024 about 234,580 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and about 125,070 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 13-15% of all lung cancers and is aggressive.
Limited Stage-Small Cell Lung Cancer – LS-SCLC (Stage I-III) accounts for approximately 30% of SCLC diagnoses and the disease is confined to one hemithorax. These patients are often treated with a combination of Carboplatin or Cisplatin with Etoposide and radiotherapy. Despite initial response, LS-SCLC typically recurs and progresses rapidly, and only 15-30% of patients are alive five years after diagnosis.
Based on the premise that SCLC has a high mutation rate, it was hypothesized that these tumors may be immunogenic and more recently immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors has demonstrated clinical activity in SCLC. IMFINZI® (Durvalumab) is a selective, high-affinity, human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, that blocks the binding of Programmed Death Ligand 1 (PD-L1) to Programmed Death 1 (PD-1) receptor and CD80, thereby unleashing the T cells to recognize and kill tumor cells. IMJUDO® (Tremelimumab) is a human immunoglobulin G2 monoclonal antibody that targets and blocks the activity of CTLA-4, enhancing binding of CD80 and CD86 to CD28. This complimentary mechanisms of action broadens clinical activity, potentially overcoming primary resistance to PD-(L)1 blockade by enabling novel T-cell responses.
The rationale for the ADRIATIC trial was supported by findings from the pivotal Phase III PACIFIC and CASPIAN trial. In the PACIFIC trial, Durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, improved both Overall Survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS), whereas in the CASPIAN trial, Durvalumab with Platinum and Etoposide chemotherapy significantly improved OS, compared to chemotherapy alone, in newly diagnosed patients with extensive-stage SCLC.
The ADRIATIC trial is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, global study that assessed the efficacy and safety of Durvalumab (IMFINZI®) as consolidation therapy in patients with Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC) who had not progressed after concurrent platinum-based chemoradiotherapy. This trial enrolled 730 patients with Stage I to III LS-SCLC, including those with inoperable Stage I/II disease. Eligible patients had a WHO Performance Status of 0 or 1, and had not experienced disease progression after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Chemotherapy consisted of a combination of Platinum plus Etoposide for up to 4 cycles, and the radiation therapy could either be once daily up to 66 Gy, or twice a day up to 45 Gy. Prophylactic Cranial Irradiation (PCI) was allowed before randomization. Patients were randomized within 6 weeks after completing concurrent chemoradiotherapy to experimental arms Durvalumab monotherapy 1500 mg IV every 4 weeks with or without Tremelimumab 75 mg IV every 4 weeks for up to 4 cycles each, followed by Durvalumab every four weeks for up to 24 months or Placebo every 4 weeks. Baseline characteristics and prior treatment were well balanced between groups. This analysis compared the outcomes in patients assigned to receive Durvalumab monotherapy (N=264) with patients who received placebo (N=266). The dual Primary endpoints were Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) for Durvalumab monotherapy versus placebo. Key secondary endpoints included OS and PFS for Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab versus placebo, Safety, and Quality of Life measures. The median duration of follow-up for OS and PFS in censored patients at this first planned interim analysis was 37.2 and 27.6 months, respectively.
The median OS with Durvalumab was 55.9 months, compared to 33.4 months with placebo. Durvalumab demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in OS compared to placebo (HR=0.73; P=0.0104), translating to a 27% reduction in the risk of death. The median PFS was 16.6 months with Durvalumab versus 9.2 months with placebo, representing a 24% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death (HR=0.76; P=0.0161). The 24-month OS rate was 68% with Durvalumab versus 58.5% with placebo, and the 36-month OS rate was 56.5% versus 47.6%, respectively. The 18-month PFS rate was 48.8% with Durvalumab versus 36.1% with placebo, and the 24-month PFS rate was 46.2% with Durvalumab versus 34.2% with placebo. Treatment benefit was generally consistent across predefined patient subgroups for both OS and PFS.
Grade 3/4 Adverse Events (AEs) were similar in both treatment groups at 24.3%, but treatment discontinuation due to AEs was slightly higher in the Durvalumab arm (16.3% versus 10.6% in the placebo arm). Any grade pneumonitis was reported in 38.0% of patients in the Durvalumab arm compared to 30.2% in the placebo arm.
The results of the ADRIATIC trial represent a significant advancement in the treatment of Limited Stage-Small Cell Lung Cancer (LS-SCLC). Durvalumab consolidation therapy demonstrated a statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both OS and PFS compared to placebo. These findings support Durvalumab as a new standard of care for patients with LS-SCLC following concurrent chemoradiotherapy, potentially changing the treatment landscape for this aggressive disease. Further analyses, including subgroup analyses and assessment of the Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab combination, are ongoing to optimize treatment strategies for LS-SCLC patients.
ADRIATIC: Durvalumab (D) as consolidation treatment (tx) for patients (pts) with limited-stage small-cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC). Spigel DR, Cheng Y, Cho BC, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(suppl 17):LBA5. doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2024.42.17_suppl.LBA5
FDA Approves Bispecific T-Cell Engager IMDELLTRA® for Small Cell Lung Cancer
SUMMARY: The FDA on May 16, 2024, granted accelerated approval to IMDELLTRA® (Tarlatamab-dlle) for Extensive Stage-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) with disease progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) originates from neuroendocrine cells and accounts for approximately 13-15% of all lung cancers. It is lethal and aggressive. The 5 year survival rate for Extensive Stage SCLC (ES-SCLC) is less than 5%, with a median survival of 9-10 months from the time of diagnosis. Treatment decisions was SCLC are typically based on the VA Lung Group 2-Staging system, which classifies disease as either Limited Stage (LS) or Extensive Stage (ES). In Limited Stage patients, the disease burden is limited to one hemithorax and regional nodes, without presence of extra-thoracic disease, and amenable to definitive-intent thoracic Radiation Therapy (RT). Extensive Stage encompasses all other SCLC patients.
Patients with ES-SCLC are often treated with chemoimmunotherapy with or without radiation in the first line setting. Second-line treatment options are limited, and the response duration is short varying from 3-5 months, with Overall Survival rarely exceeding 8 months. There are presently no approved therapies for third line and beyond and these patients face a dire prognosis.
Delta-like protein 3 also known as DLL3, is encoded by the DLL3 gene and is expressed on the surface of tumor cells but not in normal adult tissues. Patients with high-grade pulmonary NeuroEndocrine Tumors, Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) and Large Cell NeuroEndocrine Carcinoma (LCNEC) have increased expression of DLL3 protein (increased expression seen in approximately 85-96% of the SCLC tumors), making this a a potential target in the treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tarlatamab is a first-in-class bispecific T-cell engager immunotherapy that directs the patient’s T cells to cancer cells expressing delta-like ligand 3 (DLL3), independent of major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I. Tarlatamab binds to both DLL3 on cancer cells and CD3 on T cells, leading to T-cell–mediated lysis of cancer cells.
The present FDA approval was based on the efficacy of Tarlatamab in the open-label, global, multicenter, multi-cohort, Phase 2 DeLLphi-301 trial, which included patients with Relapsed/Refractory Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer with disease progression after platinum-based chemotherapy. In this Phase 2 study, patients received a step dose of Tarlatamab 1 mg IV on day 1 of cycle 1, after which they received the target dose of either 10 mg or 100 mg on day 8 and day 15 of cycle 1 and every 2 weeks thereafter in 28-day cycles (two doses per cycle) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Overall 134 patients received Tarlatamab 10 mg IV, the median age in this group was 64 years and the median duration of treatment in this group was 5.1 months. Positivity for DLL3 expression on tumor cells was not required for trial entry and patients with symptomatic brain metastases, interstitial lung disease or non-infectious pneumonitis, and active immunodeficiency were excluded.
The Primary end point was Objective Response Rate (Complete or Partial Response), as assessed by Blinded Independent Central Review. Secondary end points included Duration of Response, Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Efficacy was evaluated in 99 patients with disease progression enrolled in this study, who received Tarlatamab 10 mg IV, following platinum-based chemotherapy.
The Objective Response Rate was 40% and median Duration of Response was 9.7 months. The researchers noted that this Objective Response Rate far exceeded the historical control benchmark of 15% for the Primary end point. Of the 69 patients with available data regarding platinum sensitivity status, the ORR was 52% in 27 patients with platinum-resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer (defined as progression less than 90 days after last dose of platinum therapy) and 31% in 42 patients with platinum-sensitive Small Cell Lung Cancer (defined as progression 90 or more days after last dose of platinum therapy). The median Overall Survival was 14.3 months, with final and complete survival data still not mature. The most common adverse reactions were Cytokine Release Syndrome (CRS), fatigue, pyrexia, dysgeusia, decreased appetite, musculoskeletal pain, and constipation, anemia and nausea.
It was concluded that Tarlatamab represents a new immunotherapeutic approach for Small Cell Lung Cancer. It is the first and only DLL3-targeting Bispecific T-cell Engager therapy, establishing itself as an effective and innovative treatment option for patients with previously treated Small Cell Lung Cancer.
Tarlatamab for Patients with Previously Treated Small-Cell Lung Cancer. Ahn M-J, Cho BC, Felip E, et al. for the DeLLphi-301 Investigators. N Engl J Med 2023;389:2063-2075
