Author: RR

Late Breaking Abstract – ESMO 2020. VERZENIO® Plus Endocrine Therapy Improves Disease Free Survival in Early Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women 12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 279,100 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and about 42,690 individuals will die of the disease largely due to metastatic recurrence. About 70% of breast tumors express Estrogen Receptors and/or Progesterone Receptors, and Hormone Receptor (HR)-positive/HER2-negative breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed molecular subtype. Majority of these patients are diagnosed with early stage disease and are often cured with a combination of surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and hormone therapy. However approximately 20% of patients will experience local recurrence or distant relapse during the first 10 years of treatment. This may be more relevant for those with high risk disease, among whom the risk of recurrence is even greater during the first 2 years while on adjuvant endocrine therapy, due to primary endocrine resistance. More than 75% of the early recurrences are seen at distant sites.

Cyclin Dependent Kinases (CDK) play a very important role to facilitate orderly and controlled progression of the cell cycle. Genetic alterations in these kinases and their regulatory proteins have been implicated in various malignancies. CDK 4 and 6 phosphorylate RetinoBlastoma protein (RB), and initiate transition from the G1 phase to the S phase of the cell cycle. RetinoBlastoma protein has antiproliferative and tumor-suppressor activity and phosphorylation of RB protein nullifies its beneficial activities. CDK4 and CDK6 are activated in hormone receptor positive breast cancer, promoting breast cancer cell proliferation. Further, there is evidence to suggest that endocrine resistant breast cancer cell lines depend on CDK4 for cell proliferation. The understanding of the role of Cyclin Dependent Kinases in the cell cycle, has paved the way for the development of CDK inhibitors.MOA-of_ABEMACICLIB

VERZENIO® (Abemaciclib) is an oral, selective inhibitor of CDK4 and CDK6 kinase activity, and prevents the phosphorylation and subsequent inactivation of the Rb tumor suppressor protein, thereby inducing G1 cell cycle arrest and inhibition of cell proliferation. VERZENIO® is structurally distinct from other CDK 4 and 6 inhibitors (such as Ribociclib and Palbociclib) and is 14 times more potent against cyclin D1/CDK 4 and cyclin D3/CDK 6, in enzymatic assays, but potentially less toxic than earlier pan-CDK inhibitors. At higher doses, only VERZENIO® causes significant cancer cell death, compared with other CDK4/6 inhibitors, suggesting that this drug may be affecting proteins, other than CDK4/6. Additionally, preclinical studies have demonstrated that VERZENIO® may have additional therapeutic benefits for a subset of tumors that are unresponsive to treatment or have grown resistant to other CDK4/6 inhibitors. It has also been shown to cross the blood-brain barrier.

VERZENIO® is presently approved by the FDA as monotherapy as well as in combination with endocrine therapy for patients with HR-positive, HER2- negative advanced breast cancer. The addition of VERZENIO® to FASLODEX® resulted in a statistically significant improvement in Overall Survival among patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, who had progressed on prior endocrine therapy. The goal of monarchE was to evaluate the additional benefit of adding a CDK4/6 inhibitor to endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting, for patients with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer.

The international monarchE trial, is an open-label, randomized, Phase III study, which included 5637 patients, who were pre- and postmenopausal, with HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer, and with clinical and/or pathologic risk factors that rendered them at high risk for relapse. The researchers defined high risk as the presence of four or more positive axillary lymph nodes, or 1-3 three positive axillary lymph nodes, with either a tumor size of 5 cm or more, histologic Grade 3, or centrally tested high proliferation rate (Ki-67 of 20% or more). Following completion of primary therapy which included both adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy, patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to VERZENIO® 150 mg orally twice daily for 2 years plus 5 to 10 years of physicians choice of endocrine therapy as clinically indicated (N=2808), or endocrine therapy alone (N=2829). The median patient age was 51 years, about 43% of the patients were premenopausal, and 95% of patients had prior chemotherapy. Approximately 60% of patients had 4 or more positive lymph nodes. The Primary endpoint was Invasive Disease Free Survival (IDFS), and Secondary end points included distant Relapse Free Survival, Overall Survival, and safety. The authors in this publication reported the first results, following a preplanned interim analysis.

The addition of VERZENIO® to endocrine therapy resulted in an IDFS of 92.2% at 2 years compared with 88.7% with endocrine therapy alone, and this was statistically significant (HR=0.75; P=0.01). This suggested a 25% reduction in the risk of developing an IDFS event, relative to endocrine therapy alone, and a 3.5% absolute improvement in 2-year IDFS rates. VERZENIO® plus endocrine therapy combination also reduced the risk of metastatic recurrence especially in bone and liver (distant recurrences or Distant Relapse Free Survival) by a clinically meaningful 28% compared to endocrine therapy alone. This clinical benefit was observed in all prespecified subgroups, and among the 43% of patients who were premenopausal at diagnosis, there was a significant 37% reduction in the risk of recurrence compared to endocrine therapy alone. The safety was consistent with the known profile of VERZENIO® and included diarrhea, neutropenia, and fatigue. Diarrhea was well managed with antidiarrheal medications and dose adjustments.

It was concluded that VERZENIO® when combined with endocrine therapy demonstrated a significant improvement in Invasive Disease Free Survival, compared to endocrine therapy alone, in patients with high risk HR-positive, HER2-negative early breast cancer. The researchers also plan to look at genomic signatures in the tissue and plasma samples of enrolled patients and response to VERZENIO®.

Abemaciclib Combined With Endocrine Therapy for the Adjuvant Treatment of HR+, HER2−, Node-Positive, High-Risk, Early Breast Cancer (monarchE). Johnston SRD, Harbeck N, Hegg R, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.20.02514 Journal of Clinical Oncology – published online before print September 20, 2020

OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® Combination Doubles Progression Free Survival in Newly Diagnosed Advanced Kidney Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that 73,750 new cases of kidney and renal pelvis cancers will be diagnosed in the United States in 2020 and about 14,830 people will die from the disease. Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC) is by far the most common type of kidney cancer and is about twice as common in men as in women. Modifiable risk factors include smoking, obesity, workplace exposure to certain substances and high blood pressure. The five year survival of patients with advanced RCC is less than 10% and there is significant unmet need for improved therapies for this disease. SUTENT® (Sunitinib) is a MultiKinase Inhibitor (MKI) which simultaneously targets the tumor cell wall, vascular endothelial cell wall as well as the pericyte/fibroblast/vascular/smooth vessel cell wall and is capable of specifically binding to tyrosine kinases, inhibiting the earlier signaling events and thereby inhibits phosphorylation of VEGF receptor, PDGF receptor, FLT-3 and c-KIT. SUTENT® is the standard first-line intervention for treatment naïve patients with advanced RCC. In a large, multi-center, randomized, Phase III study, the median Progression Free Survival (PFS) with SUTENT® was 9.5 months, the Objective Response Rate (ORR) was 25%, and the median Overall Survival was 29.3 months, when compared with Interferon Alfa, in patients with treatment-naïve Renal Cell Carcinoma. This was however associated with a high rate of hematological toxicities.MOA-of-CABOZANTINIB

The FDA in 2018, approved combination immunotherapy, OPDIVO® (Nivolumab) plus YERVOY® (Ipilimumab), for the treatment of intermediate or poor-risk, previously untreated advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC), based on significantly higher Overall Survival (OS) and Objective Response Rates (ORR), compared with SUTENT® (CheckMate 214). Subsequently, two studies, a combination of BAVENCIO® (Avelumab) and INLYTA® (Axitinib) – JAVELIN Renal 101, and KEYTRUDA® (Pembrolizumab) and INLYTA® (KEYNOTE-426), demonstrated superior OS, compared to SUTENT®, and for the first time set the stage for the use of a combination of checkpoint inhibitor and targeted therapy in this patient population.

OPDIVO®, an anti-PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor and CABOMETYX® (Cabozantinib), a small-molecule Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor, are both approved as single agents, for the second-line treatment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. The rationale for combining these two agents is that OPDIVO® unleashes the immune system and restores antitumor immune response, whereas CABOMETYX® has both antiangiogenic and immunomodulatory properties and may counteract tumor-induced immunosuppression.

CheckMate 9ER study is a multinational, randomized, Phase III trial, in which a combination of OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® was compared with single agent SUTENT®, in treatment naïve patients with advanced clear cell Renal Cell Carcinoma. This study included 651 treatment naïve patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma with a clear cell component, who were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive OPDIVO® 240 mg IV every 2 weeks along with CABOMETYX® 40 mg orally daily (N=323) or SUTENT® 50 mg orally daily in 4-week-on, 2-week-off cycles (N=328). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients with any IMDC (International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium) risk score were included. Patients with sarcomatoid tumor features were allowed. Patients were stratified by IMDC risk score and tumor PD-L1 expression. The median patient age was 62 years, 58% of patients were in the IMDC intermediate risk category and 75% of patients had tumor PD-L1 expression of less than 1%. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Secondary endpoints included Overall Survival (OS), Objective Response Rate (ORR) and safety.

At a median follow up of 18.1 months, the median PFS was 16.6 months with OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® combination versus 8.3 months with single agent SUTENT® (HR=0.51; P<0.0001), suggesting a doubling of PFS, with a 49% reduction in the risk of disease progression or death. The median Overall Survival, a secondary endpoint, was not reached in either treatment group, but at this first analysis, patients randomized to the OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® combination had significantly longer OS, than those receiving SUTENT® (median Not Reached; HR=0.60; P=0.001), suggesting a 40% reduction in the risk of death. These benefits were seen consistently across pre-specified subgroups defined according to IMDC risk categories and PD-L1 expression. The Objective Response Rate (ORR) was also significantly higher and doubled among patients receiving the OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® combination, compared to those receiving SUTENT® (55.7% versus 27.1%, P<0.0001). Complete response rates were also higher among those receiving the OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® combination (8.0% versus 4.6%), with a shorter median time to response, and longer duration of response. Grade 3 or more Adverse Events were higher among those receiving OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® combination, compared to those receiving SUTENT® (60.6% versus 50.9%).

It was concluded that a combination of OPDIVO® plus CABOMETYX® demonstrated superior Progression Free Survival, Overall Survival and Overall Response Rate, compared to SUTENT®, in treatment naïve patients with advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma, and provides a new treatment option for this patient group.

Nivolumab + cabozantinib vs sunitinib in first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma: first results from the randomized phase 3 CheckMate 9ER trial. Choueiri TK, Powles T, Burotto M, et al. Ann Oncol. 2020;31(4). Abstract 696O.

FDA Approves GAVRETO® for Metastatic RET Fusion-Positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on September 4, 2020, granted accelerated approval to GAVRETO® (Pralsetinib) for adult patients with metastatic RET fusion-positive Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), as detected by an FDA approved test. The FDA also approved the Oncomine Dx Target (ODxT) Test as a companion diagnostic for GAVRETO®. Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women MOA-of-GAVRETOand accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 228, 820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers.

In addition to the well characterized gene fusions involving ALK and ROS1 in NSCLC, genetic alterations involving other kinases including EGFR, BRAF, RET, NTRK, are all additional established targetable drivers. These genetic alterations are generally mutually exclusive, with no more than one predominant driver in any given cancer. The hallmark of all of these genetic alterations is oncogene addiction, in which cancers are driven primarily, or even exclusively, by aberrant oncogene signaling, and are highly susceptible to small molecule inhibitors.

RET kinase is a transmembrane Receptor Tyrosine Kinase and plays an important role during the development and maintenance of a variety of tissues, including neural and genitourinary tissues. RET signaling activates downstream pathways such as JAK/STAT3 and RAS/RAF/MEK/ERK and leads to cellular proliferation, survival, invasion, and metastasis. Oncogenic alterations to the RET proto-oncogene results in uncontrolled cell growth and enhanced tumor invasiveness. RET alterations include RET rearrangements, leading to RET fusions, and activating point mutations occurring across multiple tumor types. RET fusions have been identified in approximately 2% of NSCLCs, 10-20% of non-medullary thyroid cancers. Activating RET point mutations account for approximately 60% of sporadic Medullary Thyroid Cancers (MTC) and more than 90% of inherited MTCs. Other cancers with documented RET alterations include colorectal, breast, and several hematologic malignancies.

GAVRETO® is an oral, highly potent, selective RET kinase inhibitor targeting oncogenic RET alterations, including fusions and mutations, regardless of the tissue of origin. The efficacy of GAVRETO® was investigated in a multicenter, open-label, multi-cohort, Phase I/II basket clinical trial (ARROW), in patients with tumors showing RET alterations. Identification of RET gene alterations was prospectively determined in local laboratories using either Next Generation Sequencing (NGS), Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization (FISH), or other tests. (In a basket trial, tumors with different histologies and single biomarker are placed in different baskets and receive a single treatment). The main efficacy outcome measures were Overall Response Rate (ORR) and response duration, as determined by a blinded Independent Review Committee, using RECIST criteria.

The efficacy for RET fusion-positive NSCLC was evaluated in 87 patients previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients received GAVRETO® 400 mg orally once daily. The ORR was 57%, with a Complete Response (CR) rate of 5.7% and 80% of responding patients had responses lasting 6 months or longer. The median Duration of Response was not reached. Efficacy was also evaluated in 27 patients who never received systemic treatment and the ORR in this patient group was 70% with 11% CR rate and 58% of responding patients had responses lasting 6 months or longer. The most common adverse reactions (25% or more) were fatigue, constipation, musculoskeletal pain and hypertension.

It was concluded that patients treated with GAVRETO® had a rapid, potent, and durable clinical response, in patients with advanced RET fusion positive NSCLC, regardless of RET fusion partner, presence of brain metastases, or prior therapies.

Gainor JF, Curigliano G, Kim D-W, et al. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9515 Journal of Clinical Oncology 38, no. 15_suppl (May 20, 2020) 9515-9515.

FDA Approves DARZALEX® plus KYPROLIS® and Dexamethasone for Multiple Myeloma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on August 20, 2020, approved KYPROLIS® (Carfilzomib) and DARZALEX® (Daratumumab), in combination with Dexamethasone, for adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory multiple myeloma, who have received one to three lines of therapy. Multiple Myeloma is a clonal disorder of plasma cells in the bone marrow and the American Cancer Society estimates that in the United States, 32, 270 new cases will be diagnosed in 2020 and 12,830 patients are expected to die of the disease. Multiple Myeloma (MM) in 2020 remains an incurable disease. The therapeutic goal therefore is to improve Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Multiple Myeloma is a disease of the elderly, with a median age at diagnosis of 69 years and characterized by intrinsic clonal heterogeneity. Almost all patients eventually will relapse, and patients with a high-risk cytogenetic profile or refractory disease have the worst outcomes. The median survival for patients with Myeloma is over 10 years.

REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide) in combination with VELCADE® (Bortezomib) and Dexamethasone is the preferred regimen according to the NCCN guidelines, for both transplant and non-transplant candidates with newly diagnosed Multiple Myeloma, and when given continuously or with maintenance therapy, has improved survival outcomes. Nonetheless, a significant number of patients progress while on these agents or discontinue therapy due to toxicities. There is therefore a need for effective and tolerable regimens for patients who are exposed or refractory to REVLIMID® or VELCADE®.Mechanism-of-Action-of-Daratumumab

KYPROLIS® (Carfilzomib) is a second generation selective, epoxyketone Proteasome Inhibitor and unlike VELCADE®, proteasome inhibition with KYPROLIS® is irreversible. DARZALEX® (Daratumumab) is a human IgG1 antibody that targets CD38, a transmembrane glycoprotein abundantly expressed on malignant plasma cells and with low levels of expression on normal lymphoid and myeloid cells. DARZALEX® exerts its cytotoxic effect on myeloma cells by multiple mechanisms, including Antibody Dependent Cellular Cytotoxicity (ADCC), Complement Dependent Cytotoxicity (CDC) and direct Apoptosis. Additionally, DARZALEX® may play a role in immunomodulation, by depleting CD38-positive regulator immune suppressor cells, and thereby expanding T cells, in patients responding to therapy. Both KYPROLIS® and DARZALEX® are approved as single agents, as well as in combination with other drugs, for the treatment of patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma. In a Phase I study, KYPROLIS® in combination with Dexamethasone and DARZALEX® demonstrated safety and efficacy in patients Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma.

The efficacy of KYPROLIS® and DARZALEX® along with Dexamethasone was evaluated in two clinical trials, CANDOR and EQUULEUS. CANDOR is a multicenter, open-label, Phase III trial, which included Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma patients with measurable disease who had received 1-3 prior lines of therapy, with Partial Response or better to one or more lines of therapy. A total of 466 patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive triplet of KYPROLIS®, Dexamethasone, and DARZALEX® (KdD)- N=312 or KYPROLIS® and Dexamethasone (Kd) alone- N=154. All patients received KYPROLIS® as a 30 minute IV infusion on days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 2 during cycle 1 and 56 mg/m2 thereafter). DARZALEX® 8 mg/kg was administered IV on days 1 and 2 of cycle 1 and at 16 mg/kg once weekly for the remaining doses of the first 2 cycles, then every 2 weeks for 4 cycles (cycles 3-6), and every 4 weeks thereafter. All patients received Dexamethasone 40 mg oral or IV weekly (20 mg for patients over 75 years of age). The median age was 64 years, 42% and 90% received prior REVLIMID® and VELCADE® (Bortezomib) containing regimens respectively, and a third of patients were refractory to REVLIMID®. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Secondary endpoints included Overall Response Rate (ORR), Minimal Residual Disease (MRD)-negative status, Complete Response (CR) rate at 12 months, Overall Survival (OS), Duration of Response, and Safety.

After a median follow up of 17 months, the study met its Primary endpoint and the median PFS was not reached for the KdD arm and was 15.8 months for the Kd arm (HR=0.63; P=0.0027). This represented a 37% reduction in the risk of progression or death in the KdD group. The PFS benefit of KdD was maintained across prespecified subgroups, particularly among REVLIMID®-exposed and REVLIMID®-refractory patients. The ORR was 84.3% in the KdD group versus 74.7% in the Kd group (P=0.004), with a CR rate or better of 28.5% versus 10.4% respectively. The median time to first response was one month in both treatment groups. Patients treated with KdD achieved deeper responses which was nearly 10 times higher, with a MRD-negative Complete Response rate at 12 months of 12.5% for KdD versus 1.3% for Kd (P<0.0001). The median treatment duration was longer in the KdD group compared to the Kd group (70.1 versus 40.3 wks). The median OS was not reached in either groups, at a median follow up time of 17 months. Toxicities were generally manageable and the incidence of Adverse Events leading to treatment discontinuation was similar in both treatment groups.

EQUULEUS is an open label, multicohort trial which evaluated the combination of KYPROLIS® administered weekly on days 1, 8, and 15 of each 28-day cycle (20 mg/m2 IV on cycle 1, day 1, and if tolerated, increased to 70 mg/m2 on Cycle 1 Day 8 and thereafter) along with DARZALEX® IV and Dexamethasone (KdD). Efficacy was based on Overall Response Rate (ORR). Of the 85 patients with Relapsed or Refractory multiple myeloma who had received 1 to 3 prior lines of therapy enrolled in the KdD cohort, the ORR was 81%, with response duration of 27.5 months.

It was concluded that a combination of KYPROLIS® along with Dexamethasone and DARZALEX® resulted in a significant PFS benefit over KYPROLIS® and Dexamethasone alone, with deeper responses, and the PFS benefit of KdD was maintained across prespecified, clinically important subgroups, particularly REVLIMID®-exposed and REVLIMID®-refractory patients. The authors added that KdD regimen should be considered as a novel, efficacious, and tolerable immunomodulatory-free treatment option for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma patients.

Carfilzomib, dexamethasone, and daratumumab versus carfilzomib and dexamethasone for patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (CANDOR): results from a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3 study. Dimopoulos M, Quach H, Mateos M-V, et al. The Lancet 2020;396:186-197.

Precision Medicine in Pancreatic Cancer May Improve Overall Survival

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 57,600 people will be diagnosed with pancreatic cancer and about 47,050 people will die of the disease. Pancreatic cancer is the fourth most common cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States and Western Europe. Unfortunately, unlike other malignancies, very little progress has been made and outcome for patients with advanced pancreatic cancer has been dismal, with a 5-year survival rate for metastatic pancreatic cancer of approximately 9%.

Patients with metastatic Pancreatic Ductal AdenoCarcinoma (PDAC) are often treated with chemotherapy and treatment regimens include FOLFIRINOX and Gemcitabine with nab-Paclitaxel (ABRAXANE®). However, resistance to current treatment modalities is common, and the median Overall Survival (OS) remains less than 1 year, suggesting that treatment with chemotherapy alone probably may not increase response rates and Overall Survival.

In an attempt to improve outcomes in patients with metastatic PDAC, molecular profiling using Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and protein IHC panel-based examination of patients’ tumors, has enabled grouping patients into molecular subgroups with therapeutically actionable molecular alterations. It is estimated that approximately 25% of pancreatic cancers harbor actionable molecular alterations, defined as molecular alterations for which there is clinical or strong preclinical evidence of a predictive benefit from a specific therapy. However, less than 5% of patients with pancreatic cancer having actionable molecular alterations receive targeted therapies. This may be because of the aggressive nature of the disease or economic and logistical barriers. The commonly altered pathways include DNA repair (15%), cell cycle (11%), and AKT/mTOR (19%). Molecular targets have included Homologous Recombination Repair genes (14-17%), HER2 amplification genes (2%) and MisMatch Repair gene deficiency (MicroSatellite Instability 2-3%). Mutations in DNA repair genes are the most common “highly actionable” alterations (15%). The most frequently mutated DNA repair genes are ATM (4.5%) and BRCA2 (2.9%). Some examples of available targeted agents for patients with metastatic PDAC include PARP inhibitors for BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, TRK inhibitors for NTRK1, NTRK2, or NTRK3 fusions, and Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for MMR-deficient or MSI-H tumors. Patients with these genetic alterations constitute about 8% of patients, with pancreatic cancer.

Know Your Tumor (KYT) is a precision medicine program, which is a collaboration between Perthera Inc. and the Pancreatic Cancer Action Network (PanCAN), and utilizes Perthera’s precision medicine system for multiomic molecular profiling of a nonselected patient population. Multiomics is data analysis at multiple levels such as genome, epigenome, transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome, to comprehensively understand human health and diseases, by interpreting molecular intricacy and variations. The intent of the KYT program is to match patients with appropriate clinical trials and therapies, based on actionable molecular alterations, treatment history, and geographical locations. The purpose of this study was to determine whether patients with pancreatic cancer whose tumors harbored actionable molecular alterations and who received molecularly matched therapy, had a longer median Overall Survival, than similar patients who did not receive molecularly matched therapy.

In this program, of the 1082 patients who received reports on their tumor genomic profile, outcomes were available for 677 patients, of whom 189 patients had actionable molecular alterations. At a median follow up of 383 days, patients with actionable molecular alterations who received a matched therapy (N=46) had a significantly longer median Overall Survival, compared to those patients who only received unmatched therapies (N=143), and this was statistically significant (2.58 years versus 1.51 years; HR=0.42: P=0.0004). The 46 patients who received a matched therapy also had significantly longer Overall Survival than the 488 patients who did not have an actionable molecular alteration (2.58 years versus 1.32 years; HR=0.34; P<0.0001). The median Overall Survival was not different between the patients who received unmatched therapy and those without an actionable molecular alteration (HR=0.82; P=0.10).

It was concluded from these Real-World outcomes that a matched therapy for patients with actionable molecular alterations can have a substantial effect on survival, in patients with pancreatic cancer. The authors acknowledged that only 2% of patients who were referred to undergo molecular profiling ultimately received a matched therapy and 143 patients with actionable molecular alterations received only unmatched therapies due to a variety of reasons including logistical issues and economic barriers.

Overall survival in patients with pancreatic cancer receiving matched therapies following molecular profiling: a retrospective analysis of the Know Your Tumor registry trial. Pishvaian MJ, Blais EM, Brody JR, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Apr;21(4):508-518.doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(20)30074-7. Epub 2020 Mar 2.

First Line FOLFOXIRI Plus Bevacizumab May Be a Preferable Strategy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Colorectal Cancer (CRC) is the third most common cancer diagnosed in both men and women in the United States. The American Cancer Society estimates that approximately 147,950 new cases of CRC will be diagnosed in the United States in 2020 and about 53,200 patients are expected to die of the disease. The lifetime risk of developing CRC is about 1 in 23. Approximately 15-25% of the patients with CRC present with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis (synchronous metastases) and 50-60% of the patients with CRC will develop metastatic disease during the course of their illness. Patients with metastatic CRC, whose disease has progressed after treatment with standard therapies, have limited therapeutic options available, to treat their disease.

In the TRIBE trial, the triplet combination FOLFOXIRI (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Irinotecan) plus Bevacizumab significantly improved Progression Free Survival compared with the doublet combination FOLFIRI (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin and Irinotecan) plus Bevacizumab in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. However, the actual benefit of first line treatment with three cytotoxic drugs compared with a preplanned sequential strategy of using doublet therapy, as well as the feasibility or efficacy of these therapies after disease progression has remained unclear. The authors in this study aimed to compare a preplanned strategy of upfront FOLFOXIRI followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression versus a sequence of mFOLFOX6 and FOLFIRI doublets, in combination with Bevacizumab. It should be noted that FOLFOXIRI regimen is not FOLFIRINOX. FOLFOXIRI regimen does not require a bolus infusion of Fluorouracil, involves a different infusional dose and schedule, and includes Irinotecan and Leucovorin at lower doses than does FOLFIRINOX.

TRIBE2 is an open-label, randomized, multicenter, Phase III study in which first line FOLFOXIRI followed by reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression, was compared with a sequence of mFOLFOX6 (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Oxaliplatin) and FOLFIRI (Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, and Irinotecan) doublets, in combination with Bevacizumab, in patients with unresectable, previously untreated metastatic colorectal cancer. A total of 679 patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to the control group (N=340) or experimental group (N=339). Patients in the control group received first-line mFOLFOX6 (Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV along with Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 120 min, Fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hours) plus Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min starting on day 1. Patients in the experimental group received FOLFOXIRI (Irinotecan 165 mg/m2 IV over 60 min, Oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2 IV along with Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 120 min, Fluorouracil 3200 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hours) plus Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min starting on day 1. Treatment was repeated every 14 days for up to 8 cycles. Patients then received maintenance treatment with Fluorouracil and Leucovorin along with Bevacizumab every 14 days until disease progression. After disease progression on maintenance treatment, patients in the control group received FOLFIRI (Irinotecan 180 mg/m2 IV along with Leucovorin 200 mg/m2 IV over 120 min, Fluorouracil 400 mg/m2 IV bolus, followed by Fluorouracil 2400 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 48 hours) plus Bevacizumab 5 mg/kg IV over 30 min starting on day 1 every 2 weeks for 8 cycles. This was followed by Fluorouracil and Leucovorin along with Bevacizumab maintenance. After disease progression on maintenance treatment in the experimental group, FOLFOXIRI was reintroduced for up to 8 cycles, followed by Fluorouracil and Leucovorin along with Bevacizumab maintenance. Patient demographics, clinical and molecular baseline characteristics, were well balanced in both treatment groups. The Primary endpoint was Progression Free Survival 2 (PFS2), defined as the time from randomization to disease progression on any treatment given after first disease progression.

At a median follow up of 35.9 months, the median PFS2 19.2 months in the experimental group versus 16.4 months in the control group (HR=0.74; P=0.0005). The median PFS1 was 12 months versus 9.8 months respectively (HR=0.74, P=0.0002). The Objective Response Rate (ORR) to first line treatment was 62% in the experimental group versus 50% in the control group (P=0.0023). The median Overall Survival was 27.4 months in the experimental group versus 22.5 months in the control group (HR=0.82; P=0.032). The most common Grade 3 or 4 adverse events during first-line treatment in the experimental group were diarrhea and neutropenia. Serious adverse events occurred in 25% of patients in the experimental group versus 17% of patients in the control group. After first disease progression, there were no significant differences in frequency of Grade 3 or 4 adverse events between the control and experimental groups, except for a higher incidence of neurotoxicity in the experimental group (5% versus 0%).

It was concluded that first line treatment with FOLFOXIRI plus Bevacizumab followed by the reintroduction of the same regimen after disease progression is the best first-line treatment option for select group of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer, compared to sequential administration of chemotherapy doublets, in combination with Bevacizumab.

Upfront FOLFOXIRI plus bevacizumab and reintroduction after progression versus mFOLFOX6 plus bevacizumab followed by FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (TRIBE2): a multicentre, open-label, phase 3, randomised, controlled trial. Cremolini C, Antoniotti C, Rossini D, et al. Lancet Oncol 2020;21:497-505

ONUREG® (Azacitidine tablets)

RR

The FDA on September 1, 2020, approved ONUREG® for continued treatment of patients with Acute Myeloid Leukemia who achieved first Complete Remission (CR) or Complete Remission with incomplete blood count recovery (CRi) following intensive induction chemotherapy, and are not able to complete intensive curative therapy. ONUREG® is a product of Celgene Corporation.

KYPROLIS® and DARZALEX®

RR

The FDA on August 20, 2020, approved KYPROLIS® (Carfilzomib) and DARZALEX® (Daratumumab) in combination with Dexamethasone for adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory multiple myeloma who have received one to three lines of therapy. KYPROLIS® is a product of Onyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. DARZALEX® is a product of Janssen Biotech, Inc.

Novel Ultrasensitive Liquid Biopsy Detects Minimal Residual Disease in Early Stage Breast Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women 12%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 279,100 new cases of invasive breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and about 42,690 individuals will die of the disease largely due to metastatic recurrence. Recurrent disease can occur early, but majority of patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer may develop recurrent disease decades, following their initial diagnosis. Once a diagnosis of metastatic breast cancer is established, it is generally incurable.

Systemic recurrence likely arises from micrometastatic disease present at initial diagnosis, which is undetectable by imaging or conventional blood tests. Adjuvant systemic therapy is recommended to eradicate micrometastatic disease and reduce the risk of cancer recurrence. However, current clinical tools are not accurate in identifying which patients would benefit from adjuvant systemic therapy and further are unable to, in real-time, predict whether the recommended therapies have achieved their therapeutic objective. Therefore, more sensitive techniques to detect micrometastatic disease are needed, so that patients receive the most appropriate and optimal therapy, with improved outcomes.

Recently published studies have shown that detection of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in the peripheral blood may identify patients at risk of relapse following definitive therapy using digital droplet Polymerase Chain Reaction (ddPCR) assays. ctDNA refers to DNA fragments that are shed into the bloodstream by cancer cells after apoptosis or necrosis. The clinical sensitivity of this technique however is limited at the early postoperative time points, at which treatment decisions are usually made, and the lead time prior to clinical manifestation of overt metastatic disease has been relatively short. This is because presently available techniques track one or few mutations and are unable to detect MRD when the fraction of cancerous cell free DNA (cfDNA) in the bloodstream is low.

The authors developed an ultrasensitive blood test for tracking hundreds of patient-specific mutations, to detect Minimal Residual Disease (MRD), with a 1,000-fold lower error rate than conventional sequencing, to identify patients who might benefit from additional systemic treatment or de-escalation of therapy. The authors performed Whole-Exome Sequencing (WES) to define several hundred mutations from each patient’s tumor, and to limit potential errors, selected somatic SNVs (Single Nucleotide Variants) to track, using duplex sequencing in cfDNA and employing strict criteria. The detection of 2 or more mutations in a cfDNA sample was considered MRD-positive and any mutations found in a patient’s own genomic DNA was excluded.

For this study, the authors identified 142 patients who had been treated for Stage 0-III breast cancer with curative intent surgery, had postoperative blood and plasma samples available. Overall, 92% of patients received either neoadjuvant, or adjuvant chemotherapy, 76% received adjuvant endocrine therapy and 73% received adjuvant radiation treatment. Approximately 2% of patients had Stage 0 disease, 23% had Stage I, 48% had Stage II, and 27% had Stage III breast cancer at diagnosis. The MRD levels were tracked post-op (median 3.5 months) and 1 year out (median 14.2 months). The patients were monitored for distant recurrences for up to 13 years. A median of 57 mutations were targeted in each patient, identified via Whole-Exome Sequencing of primary tumor tissue and genomic DNA from whole blood. About 78% of patients had post-op samples available, while 86% had 1-year samples. The Primary objective of this study was to determine the predictive power of MRD testing and associated lead time to recurrence, in patients treated for early-stage breast cancer.

The median lead time (the time from a positive test to diagnosis of metastatic disease) between the first MRD-positive result and disease recurrence was 18.9 months in the patients with the most mutations tracked. This is significantly longer than what has been seen in prior studies. Distant disease recurrence was shown to be more likely if MRD was detected at the 1-year mark (HR=20.8; P<0.0001) compared with the post-op setting. Among these patients, the positive and negative predictive values for distant recurrence, was 0.70 and 0.77, respectively. Overall, the clinical sensitivities were 81% in patients with newly diagnosed metastatic breast cancer, 23% in the post-op setting, and 19% at the one year in early stage disease, and highest among patients with the most tumor mutations available to track. The authors noted that their testing methodology was 100-fold more sensitive than ddPCR, when tracking 488 mutations.

It was concluded that the ultrasensitive blood test developed by investigators for Minimal Residual Disease (MRD) could identify survivors who might benefit from additional systemic treatment versus de-escalation. MRD detection was strongly associated with distant recurrence and provided significant lead time to recurrence, enabling early therapeutic intervention in patients who may otherwise develop metastatic recurrence. The authors recommended that future blood-based Whole-Genome Sequencing assays should aim for extra sensitivity, to identify enough mutations to track in all patients.

Sensitive Detection of Minimal Residual Disease in Patients Treated for Early-Stage Breast Cancer. Parsons HA, Rhoades J, Reed SC, et al. Clin Can Res. DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-19-3005. Published June 2020.

Association Between Immune Related Adverse Events and Recurrence Free Survival in Stage III Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: It is estimated that in the US, approximately 100,350 new cases of melanoma will be diagnosed in 2020 and approximately 6,850 patients are expected to die of the disease. The incidence of melanoma has been on the rise for the past three decades. Stage III malignant melanoma is a heterogeneous disease and the risk of recurrence is dependent on the number of positive nodes as well as presence of palpable versus microscopic nodal disease. Further, patients with a metastatic focus of more than 1 mm in greatest dimension in the affected lymph node, have a significantly higher risk of recurrence or death, than those with a metastasis of 1 mm or less. Patients with Stage IIIA disease have a disease-specific survival rate of 78%, whereas those with Stage IIIB and Stage IIIC disease have disease-specific survival rates of 59% and 40% respectively.

Immune checkpoints are cell surface inhibitory proteins/receptors that are expressed on activated T cells. They harness the immune system and prevent uncontrolled immune reactions by switching off the immune system T cells. Immune checkpoint proteins/receptors include CTLA-4 (Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte Antigen 4, also known as CD152) and PD-1(Programmed cell Death 1). Checkpoint inhibitors unleash the T cells resulting in T cell proliferation, activation, and a therapeutic response. Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types.

Immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) are commonly observed following treatment with ICIs. An association between irAEs and improved outcomes has been reported, among patients with malignant melanoma and lung cancer, treated with ICIs such as anti-CTLA-4 and anti-PD-1 antibodies. It however remains unclear whether immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) indicate drug activity in patients treated with ICIs.

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 1325/(KEYNOTE-054) trial is a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Phase III study which enrolled 1019 patients with completely resected, Stage IIIA, IIIB or IIIC Melanoma. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to receive KEYTRUDA® 200 mg IV every three weeks (N=514) or placebo (N=505) as adjuvant therapy, for a total of 18 doses (approximately 1 year) or until disease recurrence or unacceptable toxicity. KEYTRUDA® is a fully humanized, Immunoglobulin G4, anti-PD-1 monoclonal antibody, that binds to the PD-1 receptor and blocks its interaction with ligands PD-L1 and PD-L2, thereby undoing PD-1 pathway-mediated inhibition of the immune response, and unleashing the tumor-specific effector T cells.

This study met the Primary end point of Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS), in this high-risk Stage III melanoma patients. KEYTRUDA® was associated with significantly longer Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) compared to placebo in the overall intent-to-treat population, with a 1-year RFS rate of 75.4% versus 61.0% respectively (HR for recurrence or death=0.57; P<0.001). This suggested that the risk of recurrence or death in the total population was 43% lower in the KEYTRUDA® group than in the placebo group.

The authors in this publication investigated the association between immune-related Adverse Events (irAEs) and Recurrence-Free Survival (RFS) in the KEYNOTE-054 clinical trial, adjusting for age, sex and stage of the disease and also investigated the influence of systemic steroid use on outcome. Of 1011 patients who received treatment with KEYTRUDA® therapy or placebo, 61.5% were men and 38.5% were women. About 25% were 65 years and older and 37% of patients were younger than 50 years. The onset of the first irAE occurred within the first 6 months of treatment for majority of the patients who experienced an irAE and the common irAEs included endocrine disorders such as hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, and vitiligo. The incidence of irAEs was 37.4% in the KEYTRUDA® group and 9% in the placebo group, and in each treatment group, the incidence of irAEs was similar for men and women, for younger and older patients, and across different disease stages.

Consistent with previously published results in the intent-to-treat population, a prolonged RFS was observed in the KEYTRUDA® group compared with the placebo group, among patients who started the treatment allocated at the time of randomization (HR=0.56). The occurrence of an irAE was associated with a longer RFS in the KEYTRUDA® group (HR=0.61; P=0.03), but not in the placebo group (HR=1.37; P=0.21). Compared with the placebo arm, the reduction in the hazard of recurrence or death was substantially higher (P=0.03) after the onset of an irAE (HR=0.37), than without or before the onset of an irAE (HR=0.62), in patients who started KEYTRUDA® treatment. Similar results were obtained in each sex group and when only endocrine AEs were considered. Steroid are known to be immune-suppressive and treatment with KEYTRUDA® was less effective when steroids were used after the onset of an irAE.

It was concluded from this secondary analysis that the occurrence of an irAE was associated with a longer Relapse-Free Survival, among patients treated with KEYTRUDA®.

Association Between Immune-Related Adverse Events and Recurrence-Free Survival Among Patients With Stage III Melanoma Randomized to Receive Pembrolizumab or Placebo. A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. Eggermont AM, Kicinski M, Blank CU, et al. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6:519-527.