Author: RR

Immunotherapy Benefits All Patient Groups with Advanced Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2020, there will be an estimated 1.8 million new cancer cases diagnosed and 606,520 cancer deaths in the United States. Immunotherapy with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) has revolutionized cancer care and has become one of the most effective treatment options by improving Overall Response Rate and prolongation of survival across multiple tumor types. These agents target Programmed cell Death protein-1 (PD-1), Programmed cell Death Ligand-1 (PD-L1), Cytotoxic T-Lymphocyte-Associated protein-4 (CTLA-4), and many other important regulators of the immune system. Biomarkers predicting responses to ICI’s include Tumor Mutational Burden (TMB), Mismatch Repair (MMR) status, and Programmed cell Death Ligand 1 (PD‐L1) expression. Other biomarkers such as Tumor Infiltrating Lymphocytes (TILs), TIL‐derived Interferon‐γ, Neutrophil‐to‐Lymphocyte ratio, and peripheral cytokines, have also been proposed as predictors of response.Unleashing-T-Cell-Function-with-Immune-Checkpoint-Inhibitors

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors enhance antitumor immunity by unleashing the T cells. However, this benefit may vary among patients and tumor types. Sex is a biological variable that affects immune responses. Women tend to mount stronger innate as well as adaptive immune responses, than men. (Innate immunity is inherently present in the body, whereas Adaptive immunity occurs in response to exposure to a foreign substance). This can translate into greater efficacy with vaccines and more rapid clearance of pathogens. Aging alters immune responses and adaptive immunity becomes less functional. Altered ECOG Performance Status has also been associated with poor immune response. Several other studies have been published looking at these variables, with conflicting results.

To address these discordant results, the authors performed a meta-analysis to examine the potential association of sex, age, and ECOG PS with immunotherapy survival benefit in patients with advanced cancer. This study was limited to randomized clinical trials that compared Overall Survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy versus non-ICI control therapy. Data sources such as PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus were searched and a total of 37 Phase II or III randomized clinical trials involving 23,760 patients were included in the analysis. Of these, 13 trials evaluated ICIs as first-line therapy. The most common cancer types studied were Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (N= 14). The most common immune checkpoint inhibitors used were PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors (N=25). The main Outcomes and Measures were the difference in survival benefit of ICIs between sex, age (less than 65 versus 65 years or more), ECOG PS (0 versus 1 or more), as well as the outcomes stratified by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy (ICI alone or ICI combined with non-ICI) in the intervention arm.

The authors noted that Overall Survival benefit with ICI immunotherapy treatment was found for both men (HR=0.75) and women (HR=0.79), for both younger and less than 65 years (HR=0.77) and 65 years or older (HR=0.78) patients, and for both, patients with ECOG Performance Status 0 (HR=0.81) and PS greater than or equal to 1 (HR=0.79). There was no significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy in patients of different sex (P=0 .25), age (P=0.94), or ECOG PS (P=0.74). Further, there was no significant difference found in subgroup analyses by cancer type, line of therapy, agent of immunotherapy, and immunotherapy strategy in the intervention arm.

It was concluded that the results of this meta-analysis suggest that immunotherapy with ICIs may confer a survival benefit in the treatment of advanced cancer, regardless of patient sex, age, and performance status, and should not be restricted based on these characteristics.

Association of Sex, Age, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status With Survival Benefit of Cancer Immunotherapy in Randomized Clinical Trials. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Yang F, Markovic SN, Molina JR, et al. JAMA Netw Open. 2020;3(8):e2012534. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.12534

VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® for Elderly patients with AML

RR

SUMMARY: The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2020, 19,940 new cases of Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) will be diagnosed in the United States and 11,180 patients will die of the disease. AML is one of the most common types of leukemia in adults and can be considered as a group of molecularly heterogeneous diseases with different clinical behavior and outcomes. A significant percentage of patients with newly diagnosed AML are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy or have disease that is refractory to standard chemotherapy. Even with the best available therapies, the 5 year Overall Survival in patients 65 years of age or older is less than 5%. Cytogenetic analysis has been part of routine evaluation when caring for patients with AML. By predicting resistance to therapy, tumor cytogenetics will stratify patients, based on risk and help manage them accordingly. Even though cytotoxic chemotherapy may lead to long term remission and cure in a minority of patients with favorable cytogenetics, patients with high risk features such as unfavorable cytogenetics, molecular abnormalities, prior myelodysplasia and advanced age, have poor outcomes with conventional chemotherapy alone. More importantly, with the understanding of molecular pathology of AML, personalized and targeted therapies are becoming an important part of the AML treatment armamentarium.

The pro-survival (anti-apoptotic) protein BCL2 is over expressed by AML cells and regulates clonal selection and cell survival. A new class of anticancer agents known as BH3-mimetic drugs mimic the activity of the physiologic antagonists of BCL2 and related proteins and promote apoptosis (programmed cell death). VENCLEXTA® is a second generation, oral, selective, small molecule inhibitor of BCL2 and restores the apoptotic processes in tumor cells. VIDAZA® (Azacitidine) is a hypomethylating agent that promotes DNA hypomethylation by inhibiting DNA methyltransferases. VIDAZA® has been shown to significantly improve Overall Survival (OS), when compared to conventional care regimens, in elderly unfit patients with newly diagnosed AML, who are not candidates for intensive chemotherapy. The combination of VIDAZA® and VENCLEXTA® in a previously published Phase Ib study was highly efficacious, with significant responses, duration of response and Overall Survival benefit.VENCLEXTA_MOA

VIALE-A is a Phase III, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled confirmatory trial, conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a combination of VIDAZA® and VENCLEXTA®, as compared with VIDAZA® plus placebo (the control regimen), in previously untreated patients with AML, who were ineligible for intensive induction therapy. In this study, 431 patients (N=431) with previously untreated AML were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive either VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® (N=286), or VIDAZA® plus placebo (N=145). Enrolled patients were ineligible for standard induction chemotherapy because of coexisting conditions, 75 years of age or older, or both.

All patients received VIDAZA® 75 mg/m2 subcutaneously or IV on days 1 through 7 of every 28-day cycle. Patients in the study group also received VENCLEXTA® 100 mg orally on day 1 and 200 mg on day 2 and target dose of 400 mg on day 3, and continued daily until day 28 during cycle 1, to mitigate Tumor Lysis Syndrome. The dose of VENCLEXTA® was initiated at 400 mg daily in all subsequent 28-day cycles. In the control group, a matching placebo was administered orally, once daily, in 28-day cycles. The median patient age was 76 years. Secondary AML was reported in 25% of the patients in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and in 24% of the patients in the control group, and poor cytogenetic risk was reported in 36% and 39%, respectively. All the patients were hospitalized on or before day 1 of cycle 1 and for at least 24 hours after receiving the final dose of VENCLEXTA®, in order to receive prophylaxis against the Tumor Lysis Syndrome and for monitoring. The Primary endpoint was Overall Survival (OS). The Secondary end points included Complete Remission (CR) rates, composite Complete Remission (Complete Remission or Complete Remission with incomplete hematologic recovery), RBC and platelet transfusion independence, and Quality of Life according to Patient-Reported Outcomes.

At a median follow up of 20.5 months, the median OS was 14.7 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group versus 9.6 months in the VIDAZA® plus placebo group (HR=0.66; P<0.001). VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® combination resulted in a CR rate of 36.7% versus 17.9%; P<0.001 and composite CR of 66.4% versus 28.3%; P<0.001, when compared to the control regimen. Most responses were seen after the first 28-day cycle. The median time to first response was 1.3 versus and 2.8 months respectively, duration of CR was 17.5 months versus 13.3 months and median duration of composite CR was 17.5 months in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and 13.4 months in the control group. RBC transfusion independence occurred in 59.8% of the patients in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and in 35.2% of those in the control group (P<0.001), and platelet transfusion independence occurred in 68.5% and 49.7% (P<0.001), respectively. The benefits with VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® were noted in almost all molecular subgroups compared to the control regimen. The response rates were highest among patients with FLT3 mutations (72.4% versus 36.4%, P=0.02) and those with IDH1 or IDH2 mutations (75.4 % versus 10.7%, P<0.001), respectively. The incidence of febrile neutropenia was higher in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group than in the control group. Infections of any grade occurred in 85% of the patients in the VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® group and in 67% of those in the control group, and serious Adverse Events occurred in 83% and 73%, respectively.

It was concluded that among previously untreated patients with AML who were ineligible for intensive chemotherapy, those who received VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® had significantly longer Overall Survival and higher remission rates, compared to those who received VIDAZA® alone. Whether VIDAZA® plus VENCLEXTA® will replace conventional induction chemotherapy for AML, remains to be seen.

Azacitidine and Venetoclax in Previously Untreated Acute Myeloid Leukemia. DiNardo CD, Jonas BA, Pullarkat V, et al. N Engl J Med 2020; 383:617-629

Favorable Outcomes with KADCYLA® in HER2+ Breast Cancer Irrespective of Mutational Status

RR

SUMMARY: Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women in the US and about 1 in 8 women (13%) will develop invasive breast cancer during their lifetime. Approximately 276,480 new cases of invasive female breast cancer will be diagnosed in 2020 and about 42,170 women will die of the disease. Approximately 15-20% of invasive breast cancers overexpress HER2/neu oncogene, which is a negative predictor of outcomes without systemic therapy. HERCEPTIN® (Trastuzumab) is a humanized monoclonal antibody targeting HER2, and adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy given along with HERCEPTIN® reduces the risk of disease recurrence and death, among patients with HER2-positive, early stage as well as advanced metastatic breast cancer. Since the approval of HERCEPTIN®, several other HER2-targeted therapies have become available. The duration of adjuvant HERCEPTIN® therapy has been 12 months and this length of treatment was empirically adopted from the pivotal registration trials.

KADCYLA® is an Antibody-Drug Conjugate (ADC) comprised of the antibody HERCEPTIN® and the chemotherapy agent Emtansine, linked together. Upon binding to the HER2 receptor, it not only inhibits the HER2 signaling pathways but also delivers a chemotherapy agent Emtansine, a microtubule inhibitor, directly inside the tumor cells. This agent is internalized by lysosomes and destroys the HER2-positive tumor cells upon intracellular release. It is well established that patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer following HERCEPTIN® based neoadjuvant therapies have a pathological Complete Response (pCR) rate of 40-60%. Those without a pCR tend to have significantly less favorable outcomes. These patients irrespective of pathological response status complete their standard adjuvant therapy which includes 12 months of HER2-targeted therapy. KATHERINE trial was conducted to address an unmet need, and evaluate the benefit of switching from standard HER2-directed therapy to single-agent KADCYLA®, after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, in patients with residual invasive cancer at surgery.Mechanism-of-Action - KADCYLA

The KATHERINE trial is an open-label, Phase III global study, which compared KADCYLA® with HERCEPTIN®, as an adjuvant treatment for patients with HER2-positive early breast cancer, who had residual invasive disease following neoadjuvant chemotherapy and HERCEPTIN®. This study included 1,486 patients with HER2-positive early stage breast cancer, who were found to have residual invasive disease in the breast or axillary lymph nodes at surgery, following at least six cycles (16 weeks) of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with a Taxane (with or without Anthracycline) and HERCEPTIN®. Within 12 weeks of surgery, patients (N=1486) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to KADCYLA® 3.6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks or HERCEPTIN® 6 mg/kg IV every 3 weeks, for 14 cycles (743 patients in each group). Both treatment groups were well balanced and Hormone Receptor positive disease was present in 72% of the patients. The Primary end point was invasive Disease Free Survival (iDFS-defined as freedom from ipsilateral invasive breast tumor recurrence, ipsilateral locoregional invasive breast cancer recurrence, contralateral invasive breast cancer, distant recurrence, or death from any cause). At the prespecified interim analysis, invasive disease occurred in 12.2% of patients who received KADCYLA® and 22.2% of patients who received HERCEPTIN®. The estimated percentage of patients who were free of invasive disease at 3 years was 88.3% in the KADCYLA® group and 77.0% in the HERCEPTIN® group, which translated to an absolute improvement of 11.3%. Invasive Disease Free Survival (iDFS), which was the Primary end point of the study, was significantly higher in the KADCYLA® group than in the HERCEPTIN® group (HR=0.50; P<0.001).This suggested that KADCYLA® reduced the risk of developing an invasive breast cancer recurrence or death by 50%.

The authors in this publication reported the exploratory analyses of the relationship between iDFS, and biomarkers potentially related to response. The authors focused on pathways that have been implicated in resistance to HER2 treatment such as pathways associated with PIK3CA mutations, as well as HER2 and PD-L1 expression in the post-neoadjuvant residual surgical samples.

In the first part of this biomarker analysis, a total of 1,363 available post-neoadjuvant surgery samples were analyzed through DNA sequencing for PIK3CA mutations. In the second part of this analysis, mRNA expression through RNA sequencing was determined on 1,059 tissue samples of which 244 were pre-neoadjuvant samples and 815 were post-neoadjuvant surgical samples. Because the post-neoadjuvant surgical samples were representative of the entire Intent-To-Treat (ITT) patient population, biomarker analysis for markers such as HER2, PD-L1, CD8, and predefined immune signatures including 3-gene, 5-gene, Teffector, chemokine signaling, and checkpoint inhibitor signatures, were performed by using post-neoadjuvant surgical samples.

The authors noted that in the ITT population (N=743), PIK3CA mutation status had no impact on outcomes when treated with KADCYLA®. Among those patients with mutated tumors who received KADCYLA® and HERCEPTIN®, the iDFS rates were 88.9% versus 77.9%, respectively (HR=0.54) and among those with non-mutated tumors the Invasive Disease Free Survival rates were 88.3% versus 77.0%, respectively (HR=0.48). There was no prognostic impact of PIK3CA mutations in this cohort of patients and the 3 year iDFS rates were almost identical between the mutated and non-mutated tumors.

The authors next looked at HER2 gene expression in the post-neoadjuvant surgical samples and noted that patients who had a tumors with high HER2 expression in the post-neoadjuvant residual surgical samples, and received subsequent treatment with HERCEPTIN®, had the worst outcomes with worse iDFS. This detrimental effect was not seen in the KADCYLA® group, suggesting that residual tumors that have a high HER2 expression in this setting are resistant to HERCEPTIN® but not to KADCYLA®.

When patients were evaluated based on their tumor PD-L1 expression, low PD-L1 expression in post-neoadjuvant residual tumors was associated with a worse outcome for those who received treatment with HERCEPTIN®, whereas treatment with KADCYLA® did not impact outcomes. These findings suggested that PD-L1 may be involved in some resistance mechanisms.

It was concluded that in the KATHERINE trial biomarker analysis, PIK3CA mutation status did not influence outcomes in either treatment groups. However, in the post-neoadjuvant HERCEPTIN® group, high HER2 expression and low PD-L1 expression was associated with less favorable outcomes. The benefit with KADCYLA® in this patient population was independent of all biomarkers assessed.

Biomarker data from KATHERINE: A phase III study of adjuvant trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) versus trastuzumab (H) in patients with residual invasive disease after neoadjuvant therapy for HER2-positive breast cancer. Denkert C, Lambertini C, Fasching PA, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2020;38(suppl 15):502. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.502

Next-Generation Sequencing Superior to Single Gene Testing in Advanced NSCLC

RR

SUMMARY: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 228, 820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.
In addition to the well characterized gene fusions involving ALK and ROS1 in NSCLC, genetic alterations involving other kinases including EGFR, BRAF, RET, NTRK, MET, HER2 are all additional established targetable drivers. These genetic alterations are generally mutually exclusive, with no more than one predominant driver in any given cancer. The hallmark of all of these genetic alterations is oncogene addiction, in which cancers are driven primarily, or even exclusively, by aberrant oncogene signaling, and are highly susceptible to small molecule inhibitors. Patients with nonsquamous NSCLC should therefore be tested for Actionable Driver Oncogenes, as highly effective treatments may be available for these patients. Nonetheless, Single Gene Testing for EGFR and ALK is more common in the US rather than broad multigene panel testing with Next-Generation Sequencing.Overview-of-Next-Generation-Sequencing

Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) platforms or second-generation sequencing, unlike the first-generation sequencing, known as Sanger sequencing, perform massively parallel sequencing, which allows sequencing of millions of fragments of DNA from a single sample. With this high-throughput sequencing, the entire genome can be sequenced in less than 24 hours. There are a number of different NGS platforms using different sequencing technologies and NGS can be used to sequence and systematically study the cancer genomes in their entirety or specific areas of interest in the genome or small numbers of individual genes. Recently reported genomic profiling studies, performed in patients with advanced cancer suggest that actionable mutations are found in 20-40% of patients’ tumors.

The authors in this study used a decision analytic model they had developed, and compared the value of broad NGS-based testing, to Single Gene Testing (SGT), in patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, and discussed their implications for the US population. The authors noted that Single Gene Testing for EGFR and ALK is relatively common (>80%) in the US, whereas testing for less common Actionable Driver Oncogenes is rare. The broader NGS Actionable Driver Oncogene panel includes EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, RET, MET, NTRK. The authors took into consideration reimbursement by CMS for broad NGS-based testing ($627.50), reimbursement for Single Gene testing (EGFR+ALK $732.30), and the cost of treatment for 2 years at $10K/year ($20,000). The expected prevalence of Actionable Driver Oncogenes among non squamous NSCLC patients, as well as survival outcomes of patients, in the presence versus absence of an Actionable Driver Oncogenes treatment strategy, was calculated based on current literature. The number of eligible patients with nonsquamous NSCLC, for testing in the US, were 89,000 (N=89,000). The estimated number of patients with Actionable Driver Oncogenes (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, RET, MET, NTRK) was 26,300 (N=26,300). The goal of this study was to measure the cost and value differences when one chose to run a Single Gene Testing (narrow genomics panel), which included interrogation for either EGFR or ALK, versus a broader NGS panel. The potential value of each testing approach was measured based on Life Years Gained (LYG) and the cost per LYG. (Life Years gained is a modified mortality measure where remaining life expectancy is taken into account).

It was noted that a broad NGS approach to test for genetic alterations resulted in additional Life Year Gains with cost savings, compared to Single Gene Testing for EGFR or ALK. This analytical model suggested that at the current 80% testing rate, replacing Single Gene Testing with NGS would result in an additional 21,019 Life Year Gained, with reduced cost per LYG of $599. Increasing testing from 80% to 100% of eligible patients would further increase the Life Year Gained by 15,017. If 100% of eligible patients were tested with NGS and every identified patient received treatment, the cost per Life Year Gained with this strategy would be $16,641.57.

According to this decision model, the estimated median survival and 5-year survival for a patient who was tested with NGS, followed by a highly effective therapy selected on the basis of that alteration, would be 39 months and 25%, respectively. For a patient who had an Actionable Driver Oncogene that was not identified by Single Gene Testing, the estimated median survival would be 14 months and 5-year survival would be 5%. This analysis suggested that not running broad multigene NGS panel routinely for eligible patients, and only using Single Gene Testing could be a missed opportunity, as actionable mutations would be missed and patients may not get the most effective therapy for their disease.

The authors concluded that based on their decision analytic model, when highly effective therapy is available to all identified patients with Actionable Driver Oncogenes, broad NGS testing, compared to Single Gene Testing for EGFR or ALK, leads to large gains in Life Years, at reduced cost per Life Year Gained, compared to Single Gene Testing. This model supports universal NGS testing of all patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC.

A model comparing the value of broad next-gen sequencing (NGS)-based testing to single gene testing (SGT) in patients with nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the United States. Pennell NA, Zhou J, Hobbs B. J Clin Oncol 38: 2020 (suppl; abstr 9529)

MONJUVI® (Tafasitamab-cxix)

RR

The FDA on July 31, 2020 granted accelerated approval to MONJUVI®, a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody, indicated in combination with REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide), for adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Not Otherwise Specified (NOS), including DLBCL arising from Low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant. MONJUVI® is a product of MorphoSys US Inc.

First Line CYRAMZA® Plus ERLOTINIB® for EGFR-Mutated Non Small Cell Lung Cancer

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on May 29, 2020 approved CYRAMZA® (Ramucirumab) in combination with TARCEVA® (Erlotinib) for first line treatment of metastatic Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) exon 19 deletions or exon 21 (L858R) mutations.

Lung cancer is the second most common cancer in both men and women and accounts for about 14% of all new cancers and 27% of all cancer deaths. The American Cancer Society estimates that for 2020, about 228, 820 new cases of lung cancer will be diagnosed and 135,720 patients will die of the disease. Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the United States. Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) accounts for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Of the three main subtypes of NSCLC, 30% are Squamous Cell Carcinomas (SCC), 40% are Adenocarcinomas and 10% are Large Cell Carcinomas. With changes in the cigarette composition and decline in tobacco consumption over the past several decades, Adenocarcinoma now is the most frequent histologic subtype of lung cancer.

Approximately 10-15% of Caucasian patients and 35-50% of Asian patients with Adenocarcinomas, harbor activating EGFR (Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor) mutations and 90% of these mutations are either Exon 19 deletions or L858R substitution mutation in Exon 21. EGFR-Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) such as TARCEVA® (Erlotinib), IRESSA® (Gefitinib) and GILOTRIF® (Afatinib), have demonstrated a 60-70% response rate as monotherapy when administered as first line treatment, in patients with metastatic NSCLC, who harbor the sensitizing EGFR mutations. However, majority of these patients experience disease progression within 9-14 months. This resistance to frontline EGFR TKI therapy has been attributed to the most common, acquired T790M “gatekeeper” point mutation in EGFR, identified in 50-60% of patients.

TAGRISSO® (Osimertinib) is a highly selective third-generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) TKI presently approved by the FDA, for the first-line treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC, whose tumors have Exon 19 deletions or Exon 21 L858R mutations, as well as treatment of patients with metastatic EGFR T790M mutation-positive NSCLC, whose disease has progressed on or after EGFR-TKI therapy. Previously published data from the Phase III FLAURA study showed that first-line treatment with TAGRISSO® was superior to first-line treatment with other first and second generation TKI’s, in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with improved median Overall Survival. Patients with the exon 21 L858R substitution mutation however are less sensitive to TKIs and their PFS therefore has been lower, than those with exon 19 deletions. In the FLAURA study the PFS in the exon 21 mutation group was 14.4 months compared with 21.4 months for patients with an exon 19 deletion, when treated with first line TAGRISSO®. Furthermore, widespread use of TAGRISSO® has led to acquired resistance. Evolving data has shown limited responses to immune checkpoint inhibitors after disease progression on TKIs. There is therefore a critical need to develop new TKI-based therapies, and novel treatment approaches, combining TKI’s with other targeted therapies. RELAY trial was designed to address this unmet need.

CYRAMZA® is a recombinant human monoclonal IgG1 antibody that binds to the human Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor- 2 (VEGFR-2), preventing the interaction of VEGFR-2 with its ligands. CYRAMZA® was previously approved for use in combination with TAXOTERE® (Docetaxel) for the treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC who progressed while on or following treatment with platinum-based chemotherapy. Several preclinical studies have shown that dual blockade of the EGFR and VEGF pathways in EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC is synergistic, with higher antitumor activity, when compared with inhibition of the EGFR pathway alone. This has been attributed to upregulation of VEGF in the tumor microenvironment, when tumor cells harbor EGFR mutations.

RELAY trial is global, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase III study in which 449 patients with previously untreated metastatic NSCLC, who harbored either an EGFR exon 19 deletion or exon 21 L858R substitution mutation, were enrolled. Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive TARCEVA® 150 mg orally daily in combination with either CYRAMZA® 10 mg/kg IV (N=224) or placebo (N=225), every 2 weeks. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Both treatment groups were well balanced. Patients had an ECOG performance status of 0-1, median age was 64 years, and about 60% of patients were never smokers. Those with a known EGFR T790M mutation, received prior treatment with an EGFR TKI or chemotherapy, or had brain metastases, were ineligible for study enrollment. Patients were stratified by sex, EGFR mutation type, and EGFR testing methodology. The Primary end point was Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points included Overall Survival (OS), Overall Response Rate (ORR) and Duration of Response (DOR).

At a median follow up of 20.7 months, the median PFS was 19.4 months in the CYRAMZA® plus TARCEVA® group compared with 12.4 months in the placebo plus TARCEVA® group (HR= 0.59; P<0.0001). This PFS benefit was observed across several patient subgroups, and was consistent across Exon 19 and Exon 21 subgroups. Unlike in the FLAURA trial, in the RELAY trial, the PFS in patients with exon 21 mutation was comparable to patients with exon 19 deletions. The PFS for these patients with exon 21 mutation was 19.4 months. Further, the addition of CYRAMZA® to TARCEVA® did not increase the incidence of EGFR T790M mutation. The ORR was 76% in the CYRAMZA® plus TARCEVA® group and 75% in the placebo plus TARCEVA® group, with median DoR of 18.0 months and 11.1 months, respectively. At the time of the final analysis of PFS, the OS data were not mature. The most common adverse reactions in the CYRAMZA® plus TARCEVA® group were infections, hypertension, stomatitis, proteinuria, alopecia, epistaxis, and peripheral edema. The most common laboratory abnormalities were increased ALT and AST as well as cytopenias.

It was concluded that CYRAMZA® plus TARCEVA® demonstrated superior PFS, compared with placebo plus TARCEVA®, in treatment naïve patients with EGFR-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Inhibiting the VEGFR and EGFR pathways together, is an important milestone in the treatment of EGFR-mutated NSCLC, with outcomes comparable to that with third generation TKIs, and furthermore, providing these patients an additional treatment option with TAGRISSO® upon progression.

Ramucirumab plus Erlotinib in Patients with Untreated, EGFR-mutated, Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (RELAY): A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase 3 trial. Nakagawa K, Garon EB, Seto T, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:1655-1669.

FDA Approves MONJUVI® for Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on July 31, 2020, granted accelerated approval to MONJUVI® (Tafasitamab-cxix), a CD19-directed cytolytic antibody, in combination with REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide), for adult patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) Not Otherwise Specified, including DLBCL arising from low grade lymphoma, and who are not eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant.

The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2020, about 77,240 people will be diagnosed with Non Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL) in the United States and about 19,940 individuals will die of this disease. Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common of the aggressive Non-Hodgkin lymphoma’s in the United States, and the incidence has steadily increased 3-4% each year. More than half of patients are 65 or older at the time of diagnosis and the incidence is likely to increase with the aging of the American population. The etiology of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma is unknown. Contributing risk factors include immunosuppression (AIDS, transplantation setting, autoimmune diseases), UltraViolet radiation, pesticides, hair dyes, and diet. DLBCL is a neoplasm of large B cells and the most common chromosome abnormality involves alterations of the BCL-6 gene at the 3q27 locus, which is critical for germinal center formation. Two major molecular subtypes of DLBCL arising from different genetic mechanisms have been identified, using Gene Expression Profiling: Germinal Center B-cell-like (GCB) and Activated B-Cell-like (ABC). Patients in the GCB subgroup have a higher five year survival rate, independent of clinical IPI (International Prognostic Index) risk score, whereas patients in the ABC subgroup have a significantly worse outcome. Regardless, R-CHOP regimen (RITUXAN®-Rituximab, Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine, and Prednisone), given every 21 days, for 6 cycles, delivered with curative intent, is the current standard of care for patients of all ages, with newly diagnosed DLBCL, regardless of molecular subtype. Approximately 30-40% of patients experience disease progression or relapse, during the first 2 years and attempts to improve on R-CHOP regimen have not been successful. Maintenance treatment strategy following R-CHOP, to better control the disease, delay disease progression and improve long term survival, have included Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, maintenance treatment with agents such as oral protein kinase inhibitor Enzastaurin and Everolimus. Outcomes for transplant-ineligible patients with Relapsed/Refractory DLBCL patients remain poor.

REVLIMID® (Lenalidomide) is an oral immunomodulatory agent with activity in lymphoid malignancies, primarily through immune modulation (repair T-cell immune synapse dysfunction and Natural Killer cell/T-cell effector augmentation). It additionally has antiproliferative effects. REVLIMID® was shown to have significant activity in relapsed DLBCL when given alone or along with RITUXAN®. MONJUVI® is an investigational humanized Fc-engineered monoclonal antibody directed against CD19. MONJUVI® incorporates an XmAb(R) engineered Fc domain, which is intended to lead to a significant potentiation of Antibody-Dependent Cell-mediated Cytotoxicity (ADCC) and Antibody-Dependent Cellular Phagocytosis (ADCP), thus improving tumor cell kill. Preclinical data suggested that MONJUVI® might act synergistically with REVLIMID®.

L-MIND is an ongoing , multicenter, single arm, open-label, Phase II study, investigating the combination of MONJUVI® and REVLIMID® in patients with Relapsed or Refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma (R/R DLBCL), after up to two prior lines of therapy, including an anti-CD20 targeting therapy (such as Rituximab), who are not eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and subsequent Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation. This study enrolled 81 patients and patients received 28-day cycles of MONJUVI® 12 mg/kg IV once weekly during Cycles 1-3 with a loading dose on Cycle 1 Day 4, then every 2 weeks during Cycles 4-12, along with REVLIMID® 25 mg orally daily on Days 1-21 of Cycles 1-12. After Cycle 12, progression-free patients received MONJUVI® every 2 weeks until disease progression. Eighty patients (N=80) received at least one dose of both MONJUVI® and REVLIMID®. The Primary endpoint was Objective Response Rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included Duration of Response (DoR), Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS).

In this long-term analysis after a minimum of two years follow-up, outcomes from the L-MIND study were consistent with the primary analysis. Assessment by an Independent Review Committee at data cut-off showed an ORR of 58.8% and a Complete Response (CR) rate of 41.3%. Median Duration of Response was 34.6 months. The median OS was 31.6 months and median PFS was 16.2 months. The safety profile was consistent with that observed in previously reported studies of MONJUVI® in combination with REVLIMID®. The most common Grade 3 or worse Adverse Events were cytopenias and febrile neutropenia.

To determine the the contribution of MONJUVI® in the combination with REVLIMID® and to prove its synergistic effect, an observational retrospective study was conducted (Re-MIND) to compare real-world response data of patients with Relapsed or Refractory DLBCL who received REVLIMID® monotherapy with the efficacy outcomes of the MONJUVI®- REVLIMID® combination, as investigated in the L-MIND trial. In this study, efficacy data was collected from 490 R/R DLBCL patients in the US and EU. Qualification criteria for matching patients of both studies were pre-specified. As a result, 76 eligible Re-MIND patients were identified and matched 1:1 to 76 of 80 L-MIND patients based on important baseline characteristics. Objective response rates (ORR) were validated based on this subset of 76 patients in Re-MIND and L-MIND, respectively. The Primary endpoint of Re-MIND was met and shows a statistically significant superior best ORR of the MONJUVI®/ REVLIMID® combination compared to REVLIMID® monotherapy. Further, there was a significant difference in OS as well as CR rates, favoring the L-MIND cohort over the observational cohort.

It was concluded that MONJUVI® in combination with REVLIMID® resulted high Complete Response rates, as well Durable Responses and improved survival, in a significant proportion of patients with relapsed or refractory Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma, ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation, and might represent a new therapeutic option in this clinical setting.

Tafasitamab plus lenalidomide in relapsed or refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (L-MIND): a multicentre, prospective, single-arm, phase 2 study. Salles G, Duell J, Barca EG, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2020 Jul;21:978-988.

FDA Approves Oral INQOVI® for Myelodysplastic Syndromes

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on July 7, 2020, approved INQOVI®, an oral combination of Decitabine and Cedazuridine, for adult patients with MyeloDysplastic Syndromes (MDS), including previously treated and untreated de novo and secondary MDS with the following FAB subtypes – Refractory Anemia, Refractory Anemia with Ringed Sideroblasts, Refractory Anemia with Excess Blasts, Chronic MyeloMonocytic Leukemia (CMML), and Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, and high-risk International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) groups.

It is estimated that in the US approximately 13,000 people are diagnosed with MyeloDysplastic Syndromes (MDS) each year. The prevalence has been estimated to be from 60,000 to 170,000 in the US. MyeloDysplastic Syndromes are a heterogenous group of stem cell disorders characterized by marrow failure resulting in cytopenias with associated cytogenetic abnormalities, and abnormal cellular maturation with morphologic changes in clonal cells. Majority of the individuals diagnosed with MDS are 65 years or older and die as a result of infection and/or bleeding, consequent to bone marrow failure. About a third of patients with MDS develop Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML). CMML (Chronic MyeloMonocytic Leukemia) is a clonal hematopoietic malignancy characterized by accumulation of abnormal monocytes in the bone marrow and in blood. The incidence of CMML in the US is approximately 1,100 new cases per year. About 15-30% of patients with CMML develop AML. Patients with higher risk MDS and CMML are often treated with hypomethylating agents such as Decitabine (DACOGEN&reg) and Azacitidine (VIDAZA®). These agents are administered by IV infusion, or by large-volume subcutaneous injections.

INQOVI® is an orally-administered, unique fixed-dose combination of the DNA hypomethylating agent and DNA MethylTransferase (DNMT) inhibitor Decitabine, the active ingredient in Dacogen®, and the novel Cytidine deaminase inhibitor, Cedazuridine (35 mg Decitabine and 100 mg Cedazuridine). INQOVI® was designed to deliver Decitabine by oral administration. Cedazuridine prevents the degradation of Decitabine in the gut and liver by inhibiting Cytidine deaminase and the combination thereby permits the efficient delivery of Decitabine orally, at exposures that are equivalent to the approved intravenous form of Decitabine administered over 5 days.

The present FDA approval was based on data from two open-label, randomized, crossover clinical trials, ASTX727-01-B, which included 80 adult patients with MDS (IPSS Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, or high-risk groups) or CMML, and ASTX727-02, which included 133 adult patients with MDS or CMML, including all FAB subtypes and IPSS Intermediate-1, Intermediate-2, or high-risk groups. In these two trials, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive INQOVI® orally in cycle 1 and Decitabine 20 mg/m2 intravenously in cycle 2 or the reverse order. Both oral INQOVI® and intravenous Decitabine were administered once daily on days 1 through 5 of a 28-day cycle. Starting with cycle 3, all patients received INQOVI® orally once daily on days 1 through 5 of each 28-day cycle, until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Both trials provided comparison of exposure and safety in the first two cycles between oral INQOVI® and IV Decitabine and description of disease response with INQOVI®. Comparison of disease response between the INQOVI® and IV Decitabine was not possible because all patients received INQOVI® starting from Cycle 3. The Primary endpoint was total 5-day AUC exposures of Decitabine following INQOVI® therapy compared with IV Decitabine, as measured across the first 2 cycles. Secondary endpoints included safety assessments, pharmacodynamic measurements, clinical responses, RBC transfusion independence, Leukemia-free survival, and Overall Survival.

ASTX727-01-B trial which included 80 patients demonstrated a Complete Response (CR) rate of 18% and median duration of CR of 8.7 months. Among the 41 patients who were dependent on RBC and/or platelet transfusions at baseline, 49% became transfusion independent during any consecutive 56-day post-baseline period. Of the 39 patients who were independent of both RBC and platelet transfusions at baseline, 64% remained transfusion independent during any consecutive 56-day post-baseline period.

ASTX727-02 trial, which included 133 patients, demonstrated a 99% geometric mean ratio of the 5-day cumulative Decitabine AUC following 5 consecutive once daily doses of the oral combination therapy, versus that of IV Decitabine, with a 90% Confidence interval between 93% and 106%. This confirmed equivalence of oral INQOVI® and IV Decitabine. Efficacy results demonstrated that 21% of patients achieved CR, and median duration of CR was 7.5 months. Among the 57 patients who were dependent on RBC and/or platelet transfusions at baseline, 53% became transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period. Of the 76 patients who were independent of both RBC and platelet transfusions at baseline, 63% remained transfusion independent during any 56-day post-baseline period. The most common Adverse Events related to INQOVI® included fatigue, rash, dizziness, headaches, anorexia, nausea, diarrhea, constipation, mucositis, hemorrhage, myalgia, arthralgia, febrile neutropenia, and transaminase elevation.

It was concluded that INQOVI® which is a fixed-dose combination of Cedazuridine and Decitabine is a new treatment option for patients with MDS and CMML, and is an oral hypomethylating agent alternative to IV Decitabine.

https://www.fda.gov/drugs/drug-approvals-and-databases/fda-approves-oral-combination-decitabine-and-cedazuridine-myelodysplastic-syndromes

FDA Approves IO in Combination with Targeted Therapies for BRAF Positive Advanced Melanoma

RR

SUMMARY: The FDA on July 30, 2020, approved TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab), in combination with COTELLIC® (Cobimetinib) and ZELBORAF® (Vemurafenib), for patients with BRAF V600 mutation-positive unresectable or metastatic melanoma. It is estimated that in the US, approximately 100,350 new cases of melanoma will be diagnosed in 2020 and approximately 6,850 patients are expected to die of the disease. The incidence of melanoma has been on the rise for the past three decades. Surgical resection with a curative intent is the standard of care for patients with early stage melanoma, with a 5-year survival rate of 98% for Stage I disease and 90% for Stage II disease. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic melanoma historically have had poor outcomes. With the development and availability of immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF and MEK inhibitors, this patient group now has significantly improved outcomes.BRAF-and-MEK-Inhibition-in-MAPK-Pathway

The Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinase pathway (MAPK pathway) is an important signaling pathway which enables the cell to respond to external stimuli. This pathway plays a dual role, regulating cytokine production and participating in cytokine dependent signaling cascade. The MAPK pathway of interest is the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. The RAF family of kinases includes ARAF, BRAF and CRAF signaling molecules. BRAF is a very important intermediary of the RAS-RAF-MEK-ERK pathway. BRAF mutations have been detected in 6-8% of all malignancies. The most common BRAF mutation in melanoma is at the V600E/K site and is detected in approximately 50% of melanomas, and result in constitutive activation of the MAPK pathway.

ZELBORAF® (Vemurafenib), a selective oral inhibitor of mutated BRAF, demonstrated significant improvement in Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS), compared to Dacarbazine. Squamous cell carcinomas were seen in about 6% of the patients treated with BRAF inhibitors. Paradoxical activation of the MAPK pathway in cells without a BRAF mutation has been implicated in the emergence of drug resistance and increased incidence of BRAF-inhibitor induced skin tumors. MEK gene is downstream from RAF in the MAPK pathway. The addition of a selective inhibitor of MEK gene such as COTELLIC® (Cobimetinib) to a BRAF inhibitor such as ZELBORAF® has addressed some of these limitations, in previously published studies, with improvement in Objective Response Rates (ORR) and decrease in the incidence of cutaneous secondary cancers. coBRIM is a multicenter, randomized, Phase III study in which the efficacy and safety of COTELLIC® combined with ZELBORAF®, was evaluated in previously untreated patients, with advanced BRAF-mutated melanoma. The final analysis of this trial evaluated the 5-year survival data, and the OS was over 30% in patients who received the combination therapy, with a Complete Response (CR) rate was about 20%.

TECENTRIQ® (Atezolizumab) is an anti PD-L1 monoclonal antibody, designed to directly bind to PD-L1 expressed on tumor cells and tumor-infiltrating immune cells, thereby blocking its interactions with PD-1 and B7.1 receptors. PD-L1 inhibition may prevent T-cell deactivation and further enable the activation of T cells. The 5 year OS among patients receiving PD1 targeted immunotherapy is about 34%, with a median OS of 17-20 months. With the approval of multiple therapeutic options for the management of patients with BRAF-mutant melanoma, treatment decisions have become increasingly complex. In patients with limited disease burden, immunotherapy with checkpoint inhibitors is favored by most clinicians, based on the long term data supporting the durability of responses with immunotherapies, but response rates are lower. On the contrary, BRAF-targeted agents are utilized in patients with extensive, symptomatic disease and active brain metastases, as the response rates are higher but are short lived. The optimal sequence of these therapeutic strategies in order to improve long-term patient outcome, has remained unclear.

Preclinical studies suggested that combining these two targeted therapies with a checkpoint inhibitor might overcome the limitations of each class and potentially lead to more durable responses. The safety and efficacy of combining TECENTRIQ® with COTELLIC® (MEK inhibitor) and ZELBORAF® (BRAF inhibitor), in patients with BRAFV600-mutated metastatic melanoma, was evaluated in a Phase I study, with promising results, and a 28-day run-in period with COTELLIC® and ZELBORAF® was associated with an increase in proliferating CD4+ T-helper cells, without increasing the T-regulatory cells (Tregs). Tumor cells use Tregs as a shield to protect themselves against anti-tumor immune response and Tregs remain a hurdle in achieving the complete potential of anti-cancer therapies including immunotherapy. The aim of IMspire 150 trial was to determine if combining checkpoint inhibitor with two targeted therapies would improve efficacy.

IMspire150 is a pivotal, placebo-controlled, international, multicenter, double-blinded, Phase III trial, in which 514 treatment-naive patients with Stage IIIc and Stage IV, BRAF V600–mutant malignant melanoma were enrolled. Patients were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with the doublet combination or the triplet therapy. Doublet therapy given to the control group of patients consisted of ZELBORAF® 960 mg orally twice daily plus COTELLIC® at 60 mg orally, on days 1 to 21 of a 28 day cycle. In the experimental or triplet therapy group, there was a 28-day run-in with ZELBORAF® plus COTELLIC® alone, dosed similar to the control group (cycle 1), following which patients received TECENTRIQ® 840 mg IV on Days 1 and 15 of each 28 day cycle starting cycle 2, in combination with ZELBORAF® at a lower dose of 720 mg orally twice daily and COTELLIC® 60 mg orally once daily. Treatment was continued until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity. Both treatment groups were well balanced, median patient age was 54 years, 58% were male and 94% of patients had Stage IV disease. The Primary endpoint was investigator-assessed Progression Free Survival (PFS). Secondary end points included Objective Response Rates (ORR), Duration of Response (DOR), and Overall Survival (OS).

The combination of immunotherapy with targeted therapies was significantly superior to targeted therapies alone. At a median follow up of 18.9 months, the median PFS with the triplet combination was 15.1 months versus 10.6 months with the doublet therapy (HR=0.78; P=0.025). This represented a 22% reduction in the risk of disease progression. This benefit was observed across all subgroups including age, disease burden, LDH level, and extent of tumor involvement by organ site. Although Objective Response Rates were similar in both treatment groups, the median Duration of Response was 21.0 months with triplet combination versus 12.6 months for the doublet therapy. The OS data were not mature at the time of this analysis, but interim analysis however showed a median OS of 28.8 months with the triplet combination versus 25.1 months with doublet therapy. Both treatment groups had comparable toxicities. Among those patients receiving triplet combination, the most common toxicities were rash, fever, fatigue, nausea, pruritus, stomatitis, musculoskeletal pain, hepatotoxicity, edema, hypothyroidism, and photosensitivity.

It was concluded that in treatment-naive patients with advanced BRAF V600-mutant malignant melanoma, TECENTRIQ® in combination with ZELBORAF® and COTELLIC® significantly and clinically improved Progression Free Survival, when compared to placebo in combination with ZELBORAF® and COTELLIC®.

Evaluation of atezolizumab (A), cobimetinib (C), and vemurafenib (V) in previously untreated patients with BRAFV600 mutation-positive advanced melanoma: Primary results from the phase 3 IMspire150 trial. McArthur GA, Stroyakovskiy D, Gogas H, et al. Presented at: the 2020 AACR Annual Virtual Meeting I; April 27-28, 2020. Abstract CT012.